Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Election 2008: 43% Would Never Vote for Mormon Candidate (Rasmussen Poll)
Yahoooo via Rasmussen ^ | 11/20/06

Posted on 11/20/2006 8:24:45 AM PST by areafiftyone

Mitt Romney (R) begins the 2008 campaign season in fourth place among those seeking the GOP Presidential nomination, trailing Rudy Giuliani, John McCain, and Condoleezza Rice. While many Republican insiders believe the Massachusetts Governor could become an attractive candidate to the party's social conservatives, a Rasmussen Reports survey finds that Romney's faith may initially be more of a hindrance than a help.

Forty-three percent (43%) of American voters say they would never even consider voting for a Mormon Presidential candidate. Only 38% say they would consider casting such a vote while 19% are not sure. Half (53%) of all Evangelical Christians say that they would not consider voting for a Mormon candidate.

Overall, 29% of Likely Voters have a favorable opinion of Romney while 30% hold an unfavorable view. Most of those opinions are less than firmly held. Ten percent (10%) hold a very favorable opinion while 11% have a very unfavorable assessment. Among the 41% with no opinion of Romney, just 27% say they would consider voting for a Mormon.

It is possible, of course, that these perceptions might change as Romney becomes better known and his faith is considered in the context of his campaign. Currently, just 19% of Likely Voters are able to identify Romney as the Mormon candidate from a list of six potential Presidential candidates.

The response to a theoretical Mormon candidate is far less negative than the response to a Muslim candidate or an atheist. Sixty-one percent (61%) of Likely Voters say they would never consider voting for a Muslim Presidential candidate. Sixty percent (60%) say the same about an atheist.

The Rasmussen Reports survey found that 35% say that a candidate's faith and religious beliefs are very important in their voting decision. Another 27% say faith and religious beliefs are somewhat important. Ninety-two percent (92%) of Evangelical Christian voters consider a candidate's faith and beliefs important.

On the partisan front, 78% of Republicans say that a candidate's faith is an important consideration, a view shared by 55% of Democrats. However, there is also a significant divide on this topic within the Democratic Party. Among minority Democrats, 71% consider faith and religious beliefs an important consideration for voting. Just 44% of white Democrats agree.

The national telephone survey of 1,000 Likely Voters was conducted by Rasmussen Reports November 16-17, 2006. The margin of sampling error for the survey is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: evangelicalbigots; latterdaysaints; lds; mittromney; mormon; religiousfreedomdead; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 561-574 next last
To: msnimje

"Their name is, "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.""

Again, I am not stating the merits of the dispute. Merely the fact of the dispute.


81 posted on 11/20/2006 8:59:19 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Lezahal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; Howlin; areafiftyone
I don't know of ANY conservative who is so blatantly INTOLERANT.

Most, if not ALL, conservative/evangelical PEOPLE - not unknown polled unknowns! - greatly admire the (practicing) Mormons we know, and admire their sacrifices and their lifestyles.

Don't agree with them, but admire them.

This is BS, unless of course, if the pollsters/democrats/MSM are trying to abort his campaign ow.

After all, they want to abort everything else.
82 posted on 11/20/2006 8:59:43 AM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libbylu

And this shows why women shouldn't be allowed to vote.


83 posted on 11/20/2006 8:59:50 AM PST by rwfromkansas (http://xanga.com/rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: msnimje
Lots of Mormons (most?) have the same dedication to Jesus Christ

Their dedication is to the church. You leave the church and see what happens. A true Christian is simply a Christian. His denomination is irrelevant. A Baptist can worship in a Presbyterian church and a Presbyterian can worship in a Baptist church. I can go to a Catholic church and worship there even though I am Protestant.

A Christian is part of the catholic church of Jesus Christ. There is no one true denomination. A Mormon who accepts Christ as his Lord and Savior is a Christian. A Mormon who feels the Mormon church is the only true church is not a Christian because his allegiance is to the earthly church, not Christ.

84 posted on 11/20/2006 9:00:19 AM PST by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: msnimje
Are you a member of some Christian "membership committee" which gets to determine who is and is not the "right kind" of Christian?

I believe that the Nicene Creed sets down the basics for what a Christian believes. The early Church established that to fight heresy and I believe that if you agree with every statement of that Creed and do not believe anything that contradicts that Creed, you have Christian beliefs.

Since that is my belief on what constitutes Christian belief, I believe therefore that LDS teaching is not Christian teaching.

85 posted on 11/20/2006 9:01:04 AM PST by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Our man in washington

< snicker >


86 posted on 11/20/2006 9:01:14 AM PST by greyfoxx39 (Re:Terrorists: Realize that it has nothing to do with what we have done but with what they want.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: highball
Refusing to vote for a good, decent man solely because of his faith is as shortsighted as it is bigoted.

Especially when it delivers to the White House a person openly HOSTILE to you and your religion.
87 posted on 11/20/2006 9:01:22 AM PST by msnimje (You simply cannot be Christian and Pro-Abortion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

No Mormon considers other Christians real Christians.

They would say you are going to hell.


88 posted on 11/20/2006 9:01:23 AM PST by rwfromkansas (http://xanga.com/rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
They even have baptism for the dead, completely unbiblical.

Homo "rights" are unBiblical, but you don't see the some churches too concerned about it these days. Their followers STILL think their way is the only way into heaven.

89 posted on 11/20/2006 9:01:42 AM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse

"And it's idiotic if it hands the country over to the Democrats, who are militantly anti-religious unless that religion is Wahhabist Islam..."

So you shoot the messenger?

Perhaps a more constructive solution would be to find a Republican candidate who could get elected.

Haley Barbour comes to mind.


90 posted on 11/20/2006 9:01:50 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Lezahal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: redgirlinabluestate



He will appeal to the Reagan Democrats, women and Catholics (who remember JFK's fight for acceptance).

Yes, he certainly will.


91 posted on 11/20/2006 9:02:00 AM PST by libbylu (" a clearer voice of conservatism and I think Mitt Romney has an opportunity to fill that" Newt G)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: sanjacjake
Sanford's problem is he proposed a VAT tax while in congress, it is a sound idea, but difficult to convey on a 30 second commercial so the Dhims will say

"Sanford supports a 25% tax on baby food"

Absolute garbage of an ad, but it is what it is.
92 posted on 11/20/2006 9:02:14 AM PST by padre35 (We are surrounded, that simplifies our problem Chesty Puller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

When are they going to do the following polls:

1. Would you vote for a black candidate like Barack Obama?

2. Would you vote for a candidate who has a Muslim-sounding name like Barack Hussein Obama?

3. Would you vote for a ( fill in the blank ) candidate like Hillary Clinton?


93 posted on 11/20/2006 9:02:50 AM PST by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

43% ?? Is that because they are all liberals...43% of the population votes rat every election.


94 posted on 11/20/2006 9:03:22 AM PST by Mogollon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

I have my doubts that the "700 Club" bloc (as opposed to the general evangelical block) is as significant to Republicans as you say. I know lots of evangelicals, but not many watch the 700 Club regularly.


95 posted on 11/20/2006 9:03:25 AM PST by dinoparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul

You need to read the debates on the First Amendment.

They made it clear only a national religion was prohibited.

You need to read the founders. They said it was the best thing for voters to prefer Christians as rulers...not to put that in law, but for the voters to decide.


96 posted on 11/20/2006 9:03:31 AM PST by rwfromkansas (http://xanga.com/rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: libbylu

I predict Arnold will be the GOP candidate in 2008 or 2012 -- one way or another and I know what it would take for him to qualify.


97 posted on 11/20/2006 9:04:07 AM PST by varina davis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: dinoparty

Forgot to finish my point...Most evangelicals are more flexible tham the Pat Robertsons of the world.


98 posted on 11/20/2006 9:04:22 AM PST by dinoparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
Or, for that matter, a Scientologist shouting "L. RON HUBBARD AKHBAR!" and flying an airplane into a building?

Oh c'mon. That's just plain silly. A Scientologist would use an alien space ship. Sheesh.

99 posted on 11/20/2006 9:04:27 AM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
Many evangelicals will be put off by him.

And many evangelicals support him already. See evangelicalsformitt.com

Here's hoping most evangelicals will be more "put off" with the thought of Hillary as president.

100 posted on 11/20/2006 9:04:40 AM PST by redgirlinabluestate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 561-574 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson