Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/24/2006 9:24:44 AM PST by AdmSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: AdmSmith

One word: Incest.


2 posted on 11/24/2006 9:28:58 AM PST by SolidWood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith

Too Funny, but we knew this from their behaviour.


3 posted on 11/24/2006 9:29:25 AM PST by stockpirate (John Kerry & FBI files ==> http://www.freerepublic.com/~stockpirate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith
Several factors may contribute to the high prevalence of genetically determined disorders

Like slavish adherence to a make-believe moon god and his child-rapist messenger perhaps?
4 posted on 11/24/2006 9:30:55 AM PST by reagan_fanatic (Stop global warming - tell a liberal to shut up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith


Average rates of marriages between first cousins among Arabs. UAE=United Arab Emirates
6 posted on 11/24/2006 9:31:51 AM PST by AdmSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith

Inbreeding


7 posted on 11/24/2006 9:31:59 AM PST by Cinnamon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith
Inbreeding brought about the demise of the Egyptians. Of course other factors were involved too.
8 posted on 11/24/2006 9:33:01 AM PST by skimask (People who care what you do don't matter.......People who matter don't care what you do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith

Oh, I can hardly wait for the kickback on this piece of research! It might be advisable for this scientist to invest in some personal security. Any cartoonists out there?


9 posted on 11/24/2006 9:33:07 AM PST by Gunny Gene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith

Wow, that chart is amazing.


10 posted on 11/24/2006 9:33:15 AM PST by proud American in Canada (Thy Will Be Done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith

Cletus Akhbar!


11 posted on 11/24/2006 9:34:00 AM PST by Jeff Chandler (Barack Hussein Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith

Those big black tents, and social restrictions preventing men from seeing or speaking to their prospective wives before marriage, can conceal some major physical and mental defects that would make a woman unmarriageable and largely undateable in any normal society.


13 posted on 11/24/2006 9:34:38 AM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith

As long as the young and promising of thier culture keep stepping up to win Darwin Awards, we can expect the trend to continue...


14 posted on 11/24/2006 9:35:54 AM PST by SquirrelKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith

If I'd know how to do it at the time...
I should have saved a copy/screen-shot of the Palestinian Authority's
own web-page that discussed the in-freakin-credibley high levels of
cousin marriage in the PA areas.

Sounds much more retrograde than even the old stereotypes about
inbreeding in places like Oklahoma (my home state), Arkansas and
other southern states.


15 posted on 11/24/2006 9:36:06 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith

Consanguinity is the quality of being descended from the same ancestor as another person.

The degree of relative consanguinity can be illustrated with a consanguinity table, in which each level of lineal consanguinity (i.e., generation) appears as a row, and individuals with a collaterally-consanguinious relationship share the same row.

The connotations of degree of consanguinity varies by context (e.g., Canon law, Roman law, et al.). Most cultures define a degree of consanguinity below which sexual interrelationships are regarded as incestuous (the "prohibited degree of kinship"). In the Catholic Church, unwittingly marrying a closely-consanguinious blood relative is grounds for an annulment, but dispensations were granted, actually almost routinely (the Catholic Church's ban on marriage within the fourth degree of relationship (third cousins) lasted from 1550 to 1917; before that, the prohibition was to marriages between as much as seventh degree of kinship).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consanguinity


19 posted on 11/24/2006 9:40:00 AM PST by plenipotentiary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith

Have read somewhere that almost 50% of the marriages among Iraqis involved cousins (first, second, third, ect) that were arranged by their families, I'm sure this is one factor that contributes to them having a much higher degree of tribalism, sectarian strife, and the like over there compared to the West and elsewhere where it is rare.


20 posted on 11/24/2006 9:40:04 AM PST by yuta250
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith

And the inbreeding is producing murderous psychopaths.


21 posted on 11/24/2006 9:40:16 AM PST by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith

These are the filthy, inbred, brainwashed psychotics we're supposed to reason with and make deals with, which they always break.

They are about 1000 years behind in everything and yet they play the rest of the world for fools, and win every time.

These "people" are not our equals, they belong to the largest brainwashing cult in history, it would take 100 years to de-program HALF of the population from their, slaughter Israel, slaughter the west, slaughter the non-muslim mindsets.

Excuse my barbarism, but the only solution is to start killing these people by the millions, which we'll never do, Americans don't do Holocausts.

Which is why, eventually, probably not in my lifetime, we will lose, OR slaughter them by the millions.


23 posted on 11/24/2006 9:40:55 AM PST by word_warrior_bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stilwell

FYI.


24 posted on 11/24/2006 9:41:03 AM PST by reformedliberal ("Eliminate the mullahs and Islam shall disappear in fifty years." Ayatollah Khomeini)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith; All

When you and the guys go out cruisin', looking to get lucky and the best you can do is a Goat, or your sister or first cuz, what can one expect?

Unfortunately they deal in volume of births. Fortunately they deal in crappy behavior that gets them "offed" early in their miserable, non productive lives.


26 posted on 11/24/2006 9:42:51 AM PST by Gideon Reader ("The quiet gentleman sitting in the corner sipping Kenya AA and enjoying his Stan Getz CD's".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith

Consanguineous marriage within social/occupational class boundaries in Pakistan.Shami SA, Grant JC, Bittles AH.
Department of Biological Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Data on patterns of consanguineous marriage were collected from 5340 families resident in eight cities in the Pakistan province of Punjab. To assess whether social and/or occupational class was interacting with consanguinity, information also was obtained on the hereditary qaum to which each family belonged. In the present generation 46.5% of all marriages were contracted at the level of second cousin or closer, with an average coefficient of inbreeding (F) of 0.0286, and the results indicated that in each of the seventeen qaums there was strong preference for marriage to a close biological relative. However, significant differences existed in the distribution of consanguineous marriage by qaum membership, which could interfere with the interpretation of studies into the biological effects of inbreeding.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8200883&dopt=Abstract


27 posted on 11/24/2006 9:43:02 AM PST by plenipotentiary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith

>>
25-60% of all marriages are consanguineous...
<<

Quaint native custom. Who are we to judge? We celebrate diversity. We certainly cannot impose our values. Who is to say that one society is better than any other?


28 posted on 11/24/2006 9:43:07 AM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson