Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Her proposal would state that "no CUSA resources, space, recognition or funding be allocated for anti-choice purposes."

Translation:
ONLY PRO-DEATH free speech is protected.

1 posted on 11/28/2006 4:52:39 PM PST by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; Mr. Silverback; narses; 8mmMauser

Pro-Life Ping


2 posted on 11/28/2006 4:53:42 PM PST by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 69ConvertibleFirebird; Alexander Rubin; An American In Dairyland; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

Campus "tolerance" continues!

3 posted on 11/28/2006 4:54:29 PM PST by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GMMAC; fanfan

Canada Ping


4 posted on 11/28/2006 4:55:45 PM PST by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
"no CUSA resources, space, recognition or funding be allocated for anti-choice purposes."

I suppose the irony of that is lost on the 'Pro-choice' crowd.

5 posted on 11/28/2006 4:56:33 PM PST by Michael.SF. (Note: Sell Diebold Stock.................NOW!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
Her proposal would state that "no CUSA resources, space, recognition or funding be allocated for anti-choice purposes."

According to this wording, I guess unions would fall under this. This would also apply to other organizations that restrict the choices of its members.
6 posted on 11/28/2006 4:58:31 PM PST by Lord Basil (Hate isn't a family value; it's a liberal one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fanfan; GMMAC; Clive

Urgent Canada ping...Action needed...


8 posted on 11/28/2006 5:05:26 PM PST by Alexander Rubin (Octavius - You make my heart glad building thus, as if Rome is to be eternal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Behold the tolerance, self-confidence and intellectual vigor of the Left.


9 posted on 11/28/2006 5:07:09 PM PST by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

I'm glad they've begun to label us as "anti-choice".

It means that, by the same token, we can refer to them as "anti-life".


10 posted on 11/28/2006 5:09:35 PM PST by Nasty McPhilthy (Those who beat their swords into plow shears….will plow for those who don’t.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Bookmark


11 posted on 11/28/2006 5:39:23 PM PST by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
Hey Katy!

Just kidding.


13 posted on 11/28/2006 6:14:30 PM PST by period end of story (You're an errand boy, sent by grocery clerks, to collect a bill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
Her proposal would state that "no CUSA resources, space, recognition or funding be allocated for anti-choice purposes."

Since the student government is clearly anti-choice with respect to opinions on abortion, does this mean that the defund and ban themselves?

14 posted on 11/28/2006 6:49:48 PM PST by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

PRO LIFE PING!!!!!!
God please protect these helpless babies.


15 posted on 11/28/2006 6:55:15 PM PST by sweetiepiezer (A CARD CARRYING MEMBER OF THE VRWC!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
The truly unbelievable thing is the feminists profess, even demand that they can make choices regarding "their own bodies", even when that means taking the life of another body, one that they should instinctively be protecting. Yet people cannot choose what behavior to practice. They can't decide on abstinence, or birth control, because humans have no choice as to whether to have sex or with whom..........or what gender??? I suppose they would tell us because of that, they must have abortions legal.

So much of the lefts views are contradictory on so many levels.
16 posted on 11/28/2006 6:56:39 PM PST by gidget7 (Political Correctness is Marxism with a nose job)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2nd amendment mama; A2J; Agitate; AliVeritas; Alouette; Annie03; aposiopetic; attagirl; Augie76; ...
Wow, their arguments must be so strong if they're trying to squalch dissent.

ProLife Ping!

If anyone wants on or off my ProLife Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.

17 posted on 11/28/2006 10:13:03 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (We will need to crush the Iraq Study Group like we crushed Harriet Miers. Be ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Pray for Canada and for this nation.

I fear we are entering into a dark time.


19 posted on 11/29/2006 6:42:12 AM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Liberals are not tolerant of diversity and don't respect fundamental human rights of speech, religion and association.


21 posted on 11/29/2006 8:21:02 AM PST by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson