1 posted on
11/29/2006 6:57:18 AM PST by
TexKat
To: jmc1969; Ernest_at_the_Beach; SunkenCiv; Dog; ARealMothersSonForever
Al-Sadr loyalists boycott Iraq government ping
2 posted on
11/29/2006 6:59:10 AM PST by
TexKat
(Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.)
To: TexKat
Apparently the one hand tied behind your back approach
is becoming less effective, could one of you Bots call
DoD and let them know about breaking eggs to get an omlette.
3 posted on
11/29/2006 7:03:17 AM PST by
claptrap
(We've found a Witch can we burn her?)
To: TexKat
Lawmakers and cabinet ministers loyal to anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr have suspended participation in parliament and the government to protest Prime minister Nouri al-Maliki's summit with U.S. President George W. Bush. Works for me. Maybe now the Iraqi government can get something done.
About al Sadr.
4 posted on
11/29/2006 7:08:41 AM PST by
Allegra
(Can't Talk Now...I'm Busy Looking for That Civil War the Media Keeps Talking About)
To: TexKat
for a meeting with President Bush aimed at halting escalating sectarian violence and paving the way for a reduction of U.S. troops. Ending al Sadr would be a big step in that direction.
5 posted on
11/29/2006 7:10:04 AM PST by
Allegra
(Can't Talk Now...I'm Busy Looking for That Civil War the Media Keeps Talking About)
To: TexKat
On Nov 7th we surrendered Iraq and Afghanistan to the "stronger horse" of OBL, the Islamic Cults with the help of the Anti-American Left and their media here and worldwide have prevailed.
American's could care less, as long as they have Blockbuster, the "wisdom" of MSM, Borat, Comedy Central, Oprah and cheap gas.
To: TexKat
Our big mistake was in not killing Al Sadr when we had the chance in the battle of NAJAF ( and Fallujah ).
We spared him and he has given us and Iraq grief ever since.
I wonder why Saddam is still alive after his sentence. HANG HIM NOW AND GET ONE PROBLEM OUT OF THE WAY.
And oh yeah, while we're at it, bomb the hell outa the rest of these trouble makers and to hell with CNN and the UN.
To: TexKat
Time to shuffle a new deck...
...of high value targets... methinks
8 posted on
11/29/2006 7:17:24 AM PST by
Wings-n-Wind
(I live in the south for several good reasons -- "shirt-sleeve" November is one of them!)
To: TexKat
In New York on Tuesday, U.N. Security Council voted unanimously to extend for one year the mandate of the 160,000-strong multinational force in Iraq. What the heck is this supposed to mean? The U.N. Security Council had a mandate in place for a 160,000-strong multinational force that it never authorized in the first place?!
9 posted on
11/29/2006 7:49:33 AM PST by
Alberta's Child
(Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
To: TexKat
I say take this guy out now
To: TexKat; Berosus; Cincinatus' Wife; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; FairOpinion; ..
Uh-oh. This will probably mean that Sadr's group will start carrying out extrajudicial murders and causing violence all over Baghdad... ;')
15 posted on
11/29/2006 10:13:03 AM PST by
SunkenCiv
(I last updated my profile on Thursday, November 16, 2006 https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: TexKat
Why is this scumbag still running around free? If we were serious about winning this war he would be gone, one way or the other.
16 posted on
11/29/2006 10:14:51 AM PST by
Hydroshock
( (Proverbs 22:7). The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.)
To: TexKat
This is what you get by letting politicans run wars!!!!!!!!
19 posted on
12/01/2006 8:31:48 PM PST by
GregB
(Please pray for my grandchildren,Anna and Jacob!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson