Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The GOP's "least disappointed" loser
The Seattle Times ^ | November 30, 2006 | David S. Broder

Posted on 11/30/2006 2:41:26 PM PST by neverdem

WASHINGTON — The House of Representatives wastes no sympathy on defeated members. So at the beginning of this week, Jim Leach of Iowa sat in an office almost devoid of furniture, the walls stripped bare of the mementos of his 30 years of service — with just a few hours remaining before the painters moved in to prepare his domain for its new occupant.

Leach, who once had been chairman of the Banking and Financial Services Committee, would have been in line to head the Committee on International Relations in the next Congress, had Republicans maintained their majority and had he been re-elected.

But he lost, 51 percent to 48 percent, to college professor David Loebsack, as Democrats won top-to-bottom victories in Iowa earlier this month.

Leach, noted for his independence, was the only Iowa legislator to oppose going to war in Iraq. That kind of record helped him prevail in past races despite his heavily Democratic district, which gave a higher percentage of its presidential vote to John Kerry than any other district held by a Republican.

But this year, two special factors helped tip the balance against him. First, he became a target for crafting the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act, which passed Congress as part of a larger bill in October and was signed into law just before the election.

The Poker Players Alliance, which had fought the measure banning banks and credit card companies from servicing Internet gambling firms, targeted Leach and other sponsors with e-mails to its members and publicity in poker magazines. A post-election survey paid for by the gambling group found a net 5 percent swing against Leach attributable to that issue.

John Pappas, the spokesman for the alliance, said it is putting together a presentation for the new members of Congress using...

(Excerpt) Read more at seattletimes.nwsource.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: congress; electionushouse; gambling; nannystate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: GraniteStateDad
See, that's why I'm an independent!

Unless you can vote in open primaries, you lose that way. I'm thinking of switching from Conservative to R to vote in their primaries. In NYC, many register as dems to screw up their primaries either way, i.e. vote so hard left that the clown won't be acceptable in the general or try to get the most reasonable dem because the RINO is a loser in the general election.

21 posted on 11/30/2006 4:34:47 PM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Republicans stayed home rather than vote for anti-war candidates. Leach lost because of that. The gambling thing may have hurt him too -- and well it should have -- but the media will do anything to avoid admitting that there is public support for the war.


22 posted on 11/30/2006 4:52:01 PM PST by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: psjones
" I enjoy gambling, but I would never want to do it from my home, it's too easy, too convenient..."

And boring.

I like a big noisy crowd of 14 other people at a craps table with chips to knock over with the dice. That's fun if you can think on your feet. You'll find sitting to be quite boring if you learn this game.

23 posted on 11/30/2006 5:12:00 PM PST by BobS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: psjones
" I enjoy gambling, but I would never want to do it from my home, it's too easy, too convenient..."

And boring.

I like a big noisy crowd of 14 other people at a craps table with chips to knock over with the dice. That's fun if you can think on your feet. You'll find sitting to be quite boring if you learn this game.

24 posted on 11/30/2006 5:15:46 PM PST by BobS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: psjones
Maybe it's foolish, but I think being able to gamble that way from the comfort of your home could be pretty risky for those who are addicted to gambling. I enjoy gambling, but I would never want to do it from my home, it's too easy, too convenient, and with the annonymity the internet provides, you don't know whether it's fixed or not.

Next, why don't protect ourselves against alcoholism and we outlaw drinking alcohol at home? Maybe ration food so we don't overeat at home? I'm not sure I like the ideas you're coming up with, so maybe we control what news media you can read/watch/listen to at home?

25 posted on 11/30/2006 5:27:41 PM PST by Ghengis (Of course freedom is free. If it wasn't, it would be called expensivedom. ~Cindy Sheehan 11/11/06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Well if it was just 1, it was enough.


26 posted on 11/30/2006 6:45:46 PM PST by WOSG (The 4-fold path to save America - Think right, act right, speak right, vote right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: psjones
I enjoy gambling, but I would never want to do it from my home, it's too easy, too convenient, and with the annonymity the internet provides, you don't know whether it's fixed or not.

I agree that online gambling is stupid, but history has shown time and time again that trying to protect people from their own stupid behavior never works.

27 posted on 11/30/2006 6:55:51 PM PST by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: psjones
I enjoy gambling, but I would never want to do it from my home

Then don't.

But don't tell the rest of the world what they aught to do.

28 posted on 11/30/2006 10:17:42 PM PST by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: California Patriot
Internet gambling is an extremely stupid issue for people to base their votes on, given all the truly big stuff Congress deals with

The issue itself may seem trivial, but censoring the Internet as a remedy tells me that this politician is clueless about the Constitution. Furthermore, the online gambling bill extends American law enforcement overseas, where in the absence of a clear-and-present military threat to the US, it has no real jurisdiction.

I voted agsinsgt Jon Kyl this time, despite a generally good platform. because of his support for this bill and because of his multiple votes to forbid Americans from shopping around for drugs.

29 posted on 12/01/2006 5:41:51 AM PST by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

You will be able to be engaged in the process if you vote in primaries. Primaries are important. This is where we must fight our battles.


30 posted on 12/01/2006 5:44:27 AM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson