Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

B.C. Gov't Gets Tough With Private Clinic [Joys of 'Free' Health Care]
canada.com ^

Posted on 12/01/2006 6:49:09 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
This could be us if Hillary had succeeded in 1993.
1 posted on 12/01/2006 6:49:11 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines; Miss Marple; an amused spectator; netmilsmom; Diogenesis; YaYa123; MEG33; ...

Joys-of-socialism ping to Today show list.


2 posted on 12/01/2006 6:50:21 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest (Watching the Today Show since 2002 so you don't have to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
IMO .. they are trying to put healthcare out of business
3 posted on 12/01/2006 6:54:20 AM PST by Mo1 (Thank You Mr & Mrs "I'm gonna teach you a lesson" Voter ... you just screwed us on so many levels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
In recent months, the B.C. New Democratic Party has attacked the provincial Liberal government for not cracking down on doctors it says have allowed patients to pay for access to private clinics.

Those B@stards!

4 posted on 12/01/2006 6:56:47 AM PST by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG-49) Freedom's Fortress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neodad

Exactly. How dare these people think they should be allowed to purchase possibly life-saving services with their own money? We must all be willing to sacrifice in the name of serving Mother Socialism!


5 posted on 12/01/2006 7:01:36 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest (Watching the Today Show since 2002 so you don't have to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
What is this obsession with "universal health care". Why in the world can't a clinic charge a fee if the patient can and is willing to pay it in order to get better and faster service.

Its almost like they can't stand to see a medical system that out does theirs and is proven to work more efficient.

I guess Liberalism is like Islam, no matter how much one disproves a point in its doctrine, it seem Liberals would rather suffer under their ways then to adopt rational and not purely emotional ways.
6 posted on 12/01/2006 7:01:43 AM PST by KingArthur305
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

My sister in law lives in VT, where Howard Dean imposed socialized medicine before leaving office. She had hip replacement surgery (she's in her forties, but fell off her horse and broke the hip in three places)this week as an out patient. Her husband had to drive her home from Burlington in the car and get her into the house, himself. This time she only had to wait about two months for the surgery, when she needed back surgery, the wait was nine months.


7 posted on 12/01/2006 7:02:11 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KingArthur305
What is this obsession with "universal health care".

It's a quest for power.......

8 posted on 12/01/2006 7:04:14 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Tennessee - The last Conservative rock sticking above a deep blue sea....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Medical equipment is very expensive. The fifty dollar price tag for an x-ray is very low. The Canuck govt. is trying to legislate the price of equipment by regulating fees. But then again, what judge or legislature wouldn't jump at the opportunity to regulate greenhouse emissions with the intention of stopping global warming?
9 posted on 12/01/2006 7:04:44 AM PST by x_plus_one (Franklin Graham: "Allah is not the God of Moses. Allah had no son")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Eva
Amazing, Liberals would rather see everyone suffer, then to see charity and government help the people without healthcare. Case envy is at their core.
10 posted on 12/01/2006 7:09:46 AM PST by KingArthur305
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: x_plus_one
The Canuck govt. is trying to legislate the price of equipment by regulating fees.

And by doing so they will end up putting people out of business

11 posted on 12/01/2006 7:12:06 AM PST by Mo1 (Thank You Mr & Mrs "I'm gonna teach you a lesson" Voter ... you just screwed us on so many levels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: KingArthur305
Amazing, Liberals would rather see everyone suffer, then to see charity and government help the people without healthcare. Case envy is at their core.

I think it falls under the category of population control

12 posted on 12/01/2006 7:16:43 AM PST by Mo1 (Thank You Mr & Mrs "I'm gonna teach you a lesson" Voter ... you just screwed us on so many levels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
However, a Supreme Court of Canada decision last year which ruled that the Quebec government couldn't stop patients from purchasing private insurance for health-care procedures provided under medicare, given that the public system often fails to provide service in a timely manner has emboldened private clinic proponents, who believe the decision gives them legal support.

Ok, easy work around... patient buys private insurance, just before the services are delivered, that then pays for the procedures.
13 posted on 12/01/2006 7:19:03 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Actually, what they have done is destroyed capital investment in Canadian medicine because governments always, always, always set prices to certain kinds of producers way too low. The country's radiologists estimate that virtually all of the diagnostic imaging devices are in need of upgrade. Some are so old that they don't turn them off. There is a huge doctor shortage. Physicians are on a budget. They see patients until their budget is exhausted and then take a long vacation. If, that is, they haven't moved to the U.S. where they still can practice something that resembles medicine.

The people who support this kind of thing are emeshed in a utopian vision of equality. When it doesn't work out in practice, they will trash quality in order to make sure that everyone is equal.

And, make no mistake, they are busy doing that in the U.S., too.


14 posted on 12/01/2006 7:23:16 AM PST by cosine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cosine

I agree


15 posted on 12/01/2006 7:25:39 AM PST by Mo1 (Thank You Mr & Mrs "I'm gonna teach you a lesson" Voter ... you just screwed us on so many levels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

This is exactly what the Clintons had in mind for the rest of us.


16 posted on 12/01/2006 7:28:54 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cosine
If, that is, they haven't moved to the U.S. where they still can
practice something that resembles medicine.


I'm not in the medical field.
But it seemed that during my stay in Southern California
(1995-2005), about every fourth doctor I met was...from Canada.
17 posted on 12/01/2006 7:32:00 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

GMTA - see #1.


18 posted on 12/01/2006 7:32:14 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest (Watching the Today Show since 2002 so you don't have to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: cosine
The country's radiologists estimate that virtually all of the diagnostic
imaging devices are in need of upgrade.


IIRC, maybe 10 years ago an investigative news report showed that
there were more CAT scanners in Orange County (California)
than in all of Canada.

Of course access to most of the Orange County scanner costs money
or good health insurance.
But illegals get the service for free at major research universities.
(according to a friend at USC medical school)
19 posted on 12/01/2006 7:36:25 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: neodad

There is infinitely more sanctimony involved in forcing people to wait and wait and wait for necessary "free" treatment when they are ill than to allow them to pay. It's just like the song says: "Oh. Canada."


20 posted on 12/01/2006 7:48:45 AM PST by twonie (Just because there are fewer of us don't mean we are wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson