Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/02/2006 1:55:33 PM PST by mack1998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: mack1998

wristwatch and wedding ring not included


2 posted on 12/02/2006 2:00:42 PM PST by Third Order
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mack1998

Backscattering occurs in quite different physical situations. The incoming waves or particles can be deflected from their original direction by quite different mechanisms:

Rayleigh scattering of electromagnetic waves from small particles, diffuse reflection from large particles, or Mie scattering in the intermediate case, causing alpenglow and gegenschein, and showing up in weather radar;

inelastic collisions between electromagnetic waves and the transmitting medium (Brillouin scattering and Raman scattering, important in fiber optics, see below;

inelastic collisions between accelerated ions and a sample (Rutherford backscattering)

Bragg diffraction from crystals, used in inelastic scattering experiments (neutron backscattering, X-ray backscattering spectroscopy);
Compton scattering, used in Backscatter X-ray imaging.


3 posted on 12/02/2006 2:03:17 PM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mack1998
I do think they should use it, but it's a dishonest representation.

In fact, they can check out your private parts quite as easily as if you were totally disrobed.

If they say that the DUDES who use this are not going to reallly look forward to scanning chicks, well then that's just a damned lie.

It'll be a free STRIP PARLOR, no joke.

The representation whitewashed all this.

6 posted on 12/02/2006 2:18:44 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mack1998

Currently in use by the U.S. Military in Iraq and Afghanistan


7 posted on 12/02/2006 2:18:51 PM PST by centurion316 (Democrats - Supporting Al Qaida Worldwide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mack1998
Better yet, don't fly with Muslims at all.

http://knewshound.blogspot.com/2006/11/allahboard-us-airways.html

Cheers,

knewshound
10 posted on 12/02/2006 2:21:53 PM PST by knews_hound (Sarcastically blogging since 2004.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mack1998

it looked hand drawn... nothing like the other back-scatter soft x-ray images I've seen... do a search on google image search... it honestly looks kinda fake compared to the other ones


12 posted on 12/02/2006 3:52:42 PM PST by verum ago (The Iranian Space Agency: set phasers to jihad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mack1998

What would probably work better, and be a great deal easier, is to require everyone that wants to board an airplane to eat one slice of bacon.


13 posted on 12/02/2006 6:06:18 PM PST by Lucas McCain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mack1998

That's not a backscatter image, that's the picture they used when they were briefing on how the test was set up.

I looked but couldn't find the actual web site where they had that picture and two pictures that WERE actual backscatter pictures.


14 posted on 12/02/2006 8:07:35 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson