Posted on 12/04/2006 10:34:51 AM PST by SmithL
CARACAS, Venezuela - Emboldened by a resounding re-election, President Hugo Chavez pledged to shake up Venezuela with a more radical version of socialism and forge a wider front against the United States in Latin America.
Opposition contender Manuel Rosales accepted defeat Sunday night, but promised to continue countering a leader whom he accuses of becoming increasingly authoritarian.
Touting his victory in a speech to thousands, Chavez said Venezuelans should expect an "expansion of the revolution" aimed at redistributing the country's oil wealth among the poor.
"Long live the revolution!" Chavez shouted from the balcony of the presidential palace. "Venezuela is demonstrating that a new and better world is possible, and we are building it."
With 78 percent of voting stations reporting, Chavez had 61 percent of the vote, to 38 percent for Rosales.
Chavez has won a loyal following among the poor through multibillion-dollar social programs including subsidized food, free university education and cash benefits for single mothers.
Chavez, who says he sees Fidel Castro as a father, dedicated his victory to the ailing 80-year-old Cuban leader, and called it a blow against President Bush.
"It's another defeat for the devil, who tries to dominate the world," Chavez told the crowd of red-shirted supporters, who listened to him under pouring rain. "Down with imperialism. We need a new world."
Even before polls closed, Chavez supporters celebrated in the streets, setting off fireworks and cruising Caracas honking horns and shouting "Chavez isn't going anywhere!"
Since he first won office in 1998, Chavez has increasingly dominated all branches of government, and his allies now control congress, state offices and the judiciary. Current law prevents him from running again in 2012 but he has said he plans to seek constitutional reforms that would include an end to presidential term limits.
Chavez has posed a growing challenge to the United States while leading a widening bloc of Latin American leftists, influencing elections across the region, and allying himself with U.S. opponents like Iran and Syria.
The United States remains the top buyer of Venezuelan oil, but Chavez has sought to gradually diversify to new clients in Latin America and as far away as China.
Partial results from Sunday's vote showed Chavez had nearly 6 million votes versus 3.7 million for Rosales. Final turnout figures among the 15.9 million eligible voters weren't available but an official bulletin of partial results showed turnout at more than 70 percent.
"We recognize that today they defeated us," Rosales told cheering supporters at his campaign headquarters. "We will continue in this struggle."
Some aides wept. Others were angry.
"We have to do something," said 36-year-old Dona Bavaro. "My country is being stolen. This is the last chance we have. Communism is coming here."
Rosales, a cattle rancher who is now expected to return to his post of governor of the western state of Zulia, called the election a choice between freedom and increasing state control of people's lives. He also decried rampant crime and corruption, widely seen as Chavez's main vulnerabilities.
Venezuela is the world's fifth largest oil exporter and soaring oil prices have made it the continent's fastest-growing economy - a fact that some voters said helped tilt them toward Chavez.
Many who voted for the president said they think the leader's oil-funded social programs are making a difference.
"We're here to support our president, who has helped us so much," said Jose Domingo Izaguirre, a factory worker who lined up to vote and whose family recently moved into new government housing.
Some Venezuelans had predicted street protests and possibly violence after the vote, but Rosales' quick concession appeared to defuse tensions.
Nevertheless, tempers flared in some places, including in Maracaibo, Rosales' hometown, where a group of celebrating pro-Chavez teenagers was pelted with rocks and bottles while stuck in traffic. Four of the teens jumped out of their truck to chase the stone-throwers, and shots rang out but no one was reported hurt.
In newspapers splashed with photos of Chavez's post-vote celebration, several commentators suggested that reconciliation should be a major goal. The newspaper El Nacional - often strongly critical of Chavez - said in an editorial that "we aren't two countries but rather one country that should get back together" to seek coexistence and dialogue.
Venezuelan society remains sharply divided along class lines, with many middle- and upper-class Chavez opponents saying they fear what may be next in the president's play book.
Conflict and ambition have marked the rise of Chavez, 52, from a boy selling homemade sweets in a dusty backwater to a failed coup commander in 1992, and now a leader who could set the tone of Latin American politics for years to come.
Constitutional reforms he oversaw in 1999 triggered new elections the following year that he easily won. Loyalists helped him survive a 2002 coup, a subsequent general strike and a 2004 recall referendum.
The president insists he is a democrat and will continue to respect private property - though he has boosted state control over the oil industry and has said he might nationalize utilities.
Danny Glover and his liberal ilk are happy stalinist today.
When Republicans win in America, voter fraud is presumed, but suddenly the electoral process in a banana republic is above reproach.
I wouldn't be so sure that this is what they want. Anyone as corrupt as this monster is fully capable of stealing elections. (And with Jimmy Carter to "advise" him...)
Ping
It's their choice and we should respect it up to the point where he meddles in his neighbors affairs.
Chavez is and will remain extremely popular -- just as long as oil revenues keep up. As soon as they decline -- and they will -- he's in deep trouble. Chavez's political career is entirely dependent on his being able to continue to dole out petrodollars to his supporters. In fact, the Venezuelan economy is more dependent on oil than it's ever been.
Yep.
Those who think so highly of "democracy" and elections should take a look at some recent examples of just what people will vote for. They vote for what they think is in their interests. With Palestinians the highest interest is in the destruction of Israel thus they vote for Hamas. In Iraq the highest interest is the dominance of one's tribe or sect thus they vote along those lines and put a government in place whose component parts are immediately at loggerheads with one another making unity near impossible. With Venezuelans the dominant interest is in taking money from whoever has any and giving it to ME. Thus Chavez promises to steal from the rich and give to the poor and the poor - who far outnumber the rich - keep him in office. Once the money runs out though he is headed for big trouble and that is when the crackdown will take place. He will either take complete power with no pretense of "democratic principles" or he will go to the wall when his opponents engineer his downfall.
Yes - in every sense we are funding this pumped-up little caudillo. But socialist governments have proven adept at deflecting blame when their economies go south as they inevitably do. Chavez is moving to extended control of state resources sufficient to see that he can neither be voted out of office or otherwise removed.
This is a real problem for all of South America, because that much money devoted to destabilizing existing governments can be very destructive and impossible to stop. Cuba was bad enough without that tremendous source of income. This is worse.
I don't think Chavez can keep up his oil industry without help. But the Chinese have every reason to provide this help. The only recourse for the United States is to ensure that oil prices go down by developing further domestic energy sources. We can do this - but will we?
"With Palestinians the highest interest is in the destruction of Israel thus they vote for Hamas"
i have read a number of sources noting that a major reason some people voted for hamas was more a vote against Fatah for reasons of their history of governance, i.e. corruption and incompetence.
the real chance to actually remove chavez was the april 2002 incident. once that was done, he purged the military officer corp and other parts of the government, and later began purging pdv s.a. With huge oil income, he is at this point impossible to unseat. I have also read that his govt. gave citizenship to a very large number of immigrants from (where, cannot remember) who were expected to vote for him, both in the referendum vote and this one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.