Skip to comments.
U.N. OKs Weapons Trade Treaty Resolution
foxnews.com ^
| December 07, 2006
| EDITH M. LEDERER
Posted on 12/07/2006 2:29:17 PM PST by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
1
posted on
12/07/2006 2:29:19 PM PST
by
neverdem
To: neverdem
Oh yeah, that's gonna work. /s
2
posted on
12/07/2006 2:30:09 PM PST
by
dfwgator
To: neverdem
3
posted on
12/07/2006 2:39:30 PM PST
by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: dfwgator
"Oh yeah, that's gonna work." You yanked the words right out of my mouth! I was about to post that exact sentence!
4
posted on
12/07/2006 2:40:07 PM PST
by
avacado
To: neverdem
Well, let's see -- any bets on who is really sponsoring this crap idea ??? Not too hard to figure out when you go down the membership roster of communists, dictators, third-world tyrants, and Islamic fascist regimes that do not want revolutionaries arming themselves to fight against their tyranny.....
5
posted on
12/07/2006 2:44:56 PM PST
by
EagleUSA
To: EagleUSA
Exactly. And you can be sure that at least 3/4 of the idiots that signed this unenforcable pile of dung would begin violating it before the ink dried.
6
posted on
12/07/2006 3:23:05 PM PST
by
navyguy
(We don't need more youth. What we need is a fountain of SMART.)
To: navyguy
Yup Iran & Syria are going to abide by this- I have a good feeling this time- I really think it can work, I beleive- I've seen the light- I ... pass the mustard, I'm hungry. http://sacredscoop.com
7
posted on
12/07/2006 3:30:18 PM PST
by
CottShop
To: CottShop
I like your website (sacredscoop.com)! Well done and spot on!
8
posted on
12/07/2006 3:38:43 PM PST
by
navyguy
(We don't need more youth. What we need is a fountain of SMART.)
To: navyguy
And you can be sure that at least 3/4 of the idiots that signed this unenforcable pile of dung would begin violating it before the ink dried. Well, it better not happen after the omnipotent U.N. puts it's foot down!
One of the most horrific tortures to be bestowed upon anyone is to be resolutioned to death.
Oh, the humanity!!
9
posted on
12/07/2006 3:55:18 PM PST
by
EGPWS
To: navyguy
Thanks NavyGuy- What i have to say there doesn't really amount to much in the sea of liberal media- but I'm just neurotic enough that I can't stop writing lol-
10
posted on
12/07/2006 4:26:49 PM PST
by
CottShop
To: neverdem
The United States was the only country to vote against it, despite an appeal from 14 Democratic senators to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.Let me take a guess...Clinton, Schumer, Feinstein, Boxer and Lautenburg for starters. The gun grabbers want to give the U.N. the power to regulate firearms ownership in the United States by ceding our sovereignty in a treaty. The Senate could approve a treaty that would override the 2nd amendment. John Bolton has stood firm against this nonsense. You can bet any Democrat approved replacement won't raise a finger to object to this asinine attack on our country.
11
posted on
12/07/2006 4:59:31 PM PST
by
Myrddin
To: Myrddin
If they can't take our guns, they want to at least be able to mark and trace them: And dont exclude the bullets
This hideous piece of work should be sent back to Luxembourg.
12
posted on
12/07/2006 5:36:28 PM PST
by
mcar
To: mcar
It could be improved with a saw and a new blade for the front sight. An 11 degree muzzle crown is optional. Does RCBS make dies that big?
13
posted on
12/07/2006 5:41:08 PM PST
by
Myrddin
To: Myrddin
As Bolton said,"...one could lop off the top ten floors..."
14
posted on
12/07/2006 7:28:10 PM PST
by
mcar
To: neverdem
Beware of this moovement. And note The Dems in this country that support such a thing. Look up ISANA and see goocle Rebecca Peters and see what this is really about. It is about YOUR firearms. This is horrible.
15
posted on
12/07/2006 7:36:15 PM PST
by
therut
To: neverdem
Them Blue helmets can try to come and regulate the trajectory of lead in my back yard.I am sure they have some liberal moonbats who might try that.
16
posted on
12/07/2006 7:44:41 PM PST
by
Candor7
(Into Liberal flatulance goes the best hope of the West, and who wants to be a smart feller?)
To: therut
This is horrible.There's no way the Senate would get a 2/3 vote to ratify such nonsense.
17
posted on
12/07/2006 8:34:23 PM PST
by
neverdem
(May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
To: neverdem
"There's no way the Senate would get a 2/3 vote to ratify such nonsense."
It'll still affect us as the supply of importable firearms and ammunition is destroyed.
The days of the C&R license being worth anything are numbered.
To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; wku man; SLB; ...
"Enemy action" ping.
19
posted on
12/08/2006 6:41:49 AM PST
by
Joe Brower
(The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
To: neverdem
There's no way the Senate would get a 2/3 vote to ratify such nonsense.I wouldn't bet my life on it...judging by what's going to be in Congress come January - if it keeps growing, it very well could happen.
20
posted on
12/08/2006 6:51:04 AM PST
by
Andonius_99
(They [liberals] aren't humans, but rather a species of hairless retarded ape.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson