Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Reaction to Report Worries Father's Aides
US News & World Report ^ | December 8 2006 | Kenneth T. Walsh

Posted on 12/08/2006 10:27:04 AM PST by jmc1969

Former White House advisers to George H.W. Bush are keenly disappointed and concerned about the current President Bush's initial reaction to the report by the Iraq Study Group.

They consider him rather dismissive of the group's conclusions, issued yesterday, which include the view that current Iraq policy is failing. The group recommends a variety of important changes, such as assigning U.S. troops to play more of an advisory and training role and less of a combat role. The ISG also recommends that the United States withdraw most of its combat brigades by early 2008 and that the administration increase diplomatic efforts, including starting talks with Iran and Syria and energetically working toward an Israeli-Palestinian solution.

Adding to the unease were President Bush's comments at his Thursday news conference with British Prime Minister Tony Blair, in which he avoided commenting on specifics in the ISG report.

"We have a classic case of circling the wagons," says a former adviser to Bush the elder. "If President Bush changes his policy in Iraq in a fundamental way, it undermines the whole premise of his presidency. I just don't believe he will ever do that."

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 1938; appeasementdeluxe; backtookinawa; bakerboys; bipartisansellout; cutandrun; fauxrealism; hightailitouttathere; iraqstudygroup; iraqsurrendergroup; isq; munich; surrendertojihad
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

1 posted on 12/08/2006 10:27:09 AM PST by jmc1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

What an @$$hole and a coward! Sure, just throw the President under the bus, and support the Surrender Monkeys, anonymously!


2 posted on 12/08/2006 10:29:07 AM PST by Justice4Reds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969
They consider him rather dismissive of the group's conclusions

And W is the dumb one, right? Most of the groups conclusions are dumb and utter garbage. W is right to be dismissive.

3 posted on 12/08/2006 10:29:56 AM PST by frogjerk (REUTERS: We give smoke and mirrors a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

If these clowns are keenly disappointed, then I'm keenly satisfied.


4 posted on 12/08/2006 10:30:03 AM PST by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969
They consider him rather dismissive of the group's conclusions

Good


5 posted on 12/08/2006 10:30:16 AM PST by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969
Former White House advisers to George H.W. Bush are keenly disappointed and concerned about the current President Bush's initial reaction to the report by the Iraq Study Group.

So sad, too bad...

6 posted on 12/08/2006 10:30:43 AM PST by Mrs. Darla Ruth Schwerin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

He should have used it to clean up after Barney..........


7 posted on 12/08/2006 10:30:48 AM PST by Red Badger (New! HeadOn Hemorrhoid Medication for Liberals!.........Apply directly to forehead.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969
"They consider him rather dismissive of the group's conclusions..."

Maybe because he knows they are junk.

8 posted on 12/08/2006 10:31:01 AM PST by BenLurkin ("The entire remedy is with the people." - W. H. Harrison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul
They consider him rather dismissive of the group's conclusions, issued yesterday,

Best news I have read in a few days! ;-)

9 posted on 12/08/2006 10:31:17 AM PST by HitmanLV (Rock, Rock, Rock and Rollergames! Rockin' & Rolling, Rockin' with Rollergames!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

Oh, Really?

Well, I'LL be disappointed if he follows their suggestion of talking to the Iranians and Syrians.


10 posted on 12/08/2006 10:32:28 AM PST by nuconvert ([there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business] (...but his head is so tiny...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Theres even enough of it for Mrs. Beasley and the kitty!


11 posted on 12/08/2006 10:32:43 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

W is one of the few that see the dark clouds on the horizon.


12 posted on 12/08/2006 10:32:46 AM PST by kinghorse (calls them like I sees them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969
They consider him rather dismissive of the group's conclusions

And the problem with this is ???

13 posted on 12/08/2006 10:33:28 AM PST by pbear8 (RIP James Kim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

How the hell did we survive 88-92 with so many of these clowns in charge?

My take is that Papa Buss invalidated some of the REALLY REALLY bad policies.

He was POTUS after all.


14 posted on 12/08/2006 10:33:48 AM PST by Killborn (Age of servitude. A government of the traitors, by the liars, for the sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
The Study Group's recommendations for Iraq seem virtually identical to the policies that got us into trouble in Viet Nam as early as the Kennedy regime.

More worrisome, though, is the attitude implicit in the report that the "Missouri Compromise" will continue to work to keep America safe ~

15 posted on 12/08/2006 10:35:05 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

History will show that W was the last president that had a pair.


16 posted on 12/08/2006 10:35:31 AM PST by todd1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kinghorse
W is one of the few that see the dark clouds on the horizon.

And most of Poppy's greedy old cowardly Saudi lackeys are in their twilight years and probably don't care much about what things will be like 10-20 years down the road.

They have little or nothing to offer in the way of worthwhile advice for how we're going to deal with this problem. They did a lot to contribute to the problem in the first place.

17 posted on 12/08/2006 10:37:46 AM PST by jpl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

GHWB, crawl back into the shadow of your son, who, hopefully, will NOT be distracted by James Baker, Globalist lawyer to the Saudi Dubais, and Lee Hamilton, a pompous self-important nincompoop.


18 posted on 12/08/2006 10:37:53 AM PST by Paperdoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969
They consider him rather dismissive of the group's conclusions

As well he should be, considering many of those conclusions would've made even Neville Chamberlain blush.

19 posted on 12/08/2006 10:38:11 AM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

This isn't "circling the wagons". It is politely ignoring the ravings of a pack of lunatics. You don't even have to go past the executive summary of the report to see that the the ten wise guys had to be drunk when they wrote it.


20 posted on 12/08/2006 10:38:22 AM PST by Busywhiskers (Strength and honor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson