Skip to comments.
Bolton's successor (Zalmay Khalilzad)
December 9, 2006 ^
| 12-9-06
| Robert D. Novak
Posted on 12/09/2006 7:59:56 AM PST by veronica
WASHINGTON -- Zalmay Khalilzad, who was announced this week as leaving as U.S. ambassador to Iraq, is the leading prospect to replace John Bolton as envoy to the United Nations.
President Bush was reported by aides as looking for someone who approximates Bolton's combination of toughness and diplomatic skill and has tentatively decided on Khalilzad. A native of Afghanistan, he has served in government posts dating back to 1985 and is the highest-ranking Muslim in the Bush administration.
Speculation on a new U.S. ambassador to the United Nations to succeed John Bolton is focusing on the current U.S. ambassador in Iraq, Khalilzad, and a former U.S. deputy ambassador at the U.N., Richard Williamson. A footnote: State Department sources have said Andrew Card, who on April 14 finished five years as White House chief of staff, was interested in the UN post and was a dark horse to get it. However, he never made any such desire known to the president and is not being considered for the UN.
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bigots; dividedloyalties; enemywithin; fifthcolumn; hate; infiltration; khalilzad; retards; zalmaykhalilzad
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-200 ... 401-406 next last
1
posted on
12/09/2006 7:59:59 AM PST
by
veronica
To: veronica
His first official act should be a proposal to relocate UN headquarters to Mogadishu.
2
posted on
12/09/2006 8:02:30 AM PST
by
Argus
Comment #3 Removed by Moderator
To: Argus
And his second should be to renounce Islam.
4
posted on
12/09/2006 8:07:30 AM PST
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: veronica
Can't we all just get along. Working toward the new tone. /sarc
5
posted on
12/09/2006 8:11:48 AM PST
by
Dustbunny
(The BIBLE - Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth)
To: veronica
I just read that on Drudge.. Disbelief.. unless we are trying to prove how Muslim friendly we are then at the last minute nominate someone else..
6
posted on
12/09/2006 8:13:20 AM PST
by
divine_moment_of_facts
("So, I put on some tangerine lip gloss and answered the door.. I was one lucky woman.")
To: diverteach
Why? Who is this guy and why is it bad he is in the running? I would like to know all about him before I say he won't represent our interests. For all I know he will be another Bolton.
After all, Howard Dean is a right proper Vermont name and he is busy selling us out to European socialists along with the rest of his party. (See the tag line)
7
posted on
12/09/2006 8:13:53 AM PST
by
IrishCatholic
(No local communist or socialist party chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing.)
To: diverteach
Bolton for Khalilzad????? Has someone lost their mind! This whole administration is a mess.
To: veronica
...the highest-ranking Muslim in the Bush administration. Sorry, can't ultimately trust him.
9
posted on
12/09/2006 8:18:08 AM PST
by
BigFinn
To: veronica; All
You are Eff'en kidding, right? Right?
How about Synphonia McKinney? She's looking for work.
Just about as good.
Geeeeez, can't we catch a break and maybe by some weird and unusual accident get a competent spokesmodel for the USA, in there.
10
posted on
12/09/2006 8:19:29 AM PST
by
Gideon Reader
("The quiet gentleman sitting in the corner sipping Lagavulin, early in the day.)
To: Orange1998
Bolton for Khalilzad????? Has someone lost their mind! This whole administration is a mess.That's the same thing I said to my family.
To: IrishCatholic
Been to Vermont lately? It would make any EU type America basher very proud. Dean is typical of the lot.
12
posted on
12/09/2006 8:26:14 AM PST
by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: BigFinn
I guess nobody has been paying attention for the last 5 years. If I'm not mistaken, when push comes to shove his loyalties must be towards Allah and Islam first. Which makes him ineligible for public office in my mind. Ditto the other public/elected officials whose loyalties are in doubt.
To: veronica
I thought for sure this was Scrappleface or the Onion...but sadly, the joke is on us....
To: diverteach
Why doesn't Bush just surrender this country to Al Queda on televison now?
Bush doesn't care about his legacy.
Obviously no one in the administration cares about the future of this country.
15
posted on
12/09/2006 8:36:02 AM PST
by
racing fan
(Go Team Israel!)
To: veronica
I see nothing in his biography at Wik to make me wary of this guy. The only thing that appears to have many on this thread hysterical is the fact that he's Muslim which in my mind is NOT by itself indicative of untrustworthiness or inability to look out for our interests.
To: racing fan
17
posted on
12/09/2006 8:42:41 AM PST
by
ClaireSolt
(Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
To: traderrob6
18
posted on
12/09/2006 8:42:53 AM PST
by
flixxx
To: traderrob6
Considering how anti-Israel the UN is, this appears to be an awful choice. It is possible this man is not hostile to Israel, but I wouldn't bet the farm on it.
19
posted on
12/09/2006 8:43:10 AM PST
by
veronica
(http://images20.fotki.com/v360/photos/1/106521/3848737/gladysPSCP-vi.jpg)
To: veronica
A native of Afghanistan, he has served in government posts dating back to 1985 and is the highest-ranking Muslim in the Bush administration. It might be a nice change to have a Muslim standing up for American goals in the UN. Who knows, it could encourage Muslims in the U.S. to do the same.
To: IrishCatholic
Why? Who is this guy and why is it bad he is in the running? The fact that you even ask this question proves you're an idiot.
Khalilzad has pulled this country's cookies out of the fire; he has been a single handed, one stop shop crisis manager in 2 theaters. If not for him, both Afgahnistan and Iraq would have been lost by now.
This guy should be TIME's man of the Year.
A good choice for the UN.
21
posted on
12/09/2006 8:45:50 AM PST
by
zarf
Comment #22 Removed by Moderator
To: diverteach
the highest-ranking Muslim in the Bush administration
Now you're talking .... not.
To: veronica
Considering how anti-Israel the UN is, this appears to be an awful choice. It is possible this man is not hostile to Israel, but I wouldn't bet the farm on it. Could you read about Mr. Khalilzad before you run your mouth? He's been a national hero since 9/11....the essential man.
24
posted on
12/09/2006 8:48:20 AM PST
by
zarf
To: kittymyrib
Will he take his oath on the Koran?
To: ClaireSolt
Is he still a Unocal consultant?
To: zarf
he has been a single handed, one stop shop crisis manager in 2 theaters. If not for him, both Afgahnistan and Iraq would have been lost by now.
How, why, what? Give some details. All you offer is rhetoric. What, specifically, has he done to save Afghanistan and Iraq?
To: veronica
this appears to be an awful choice.
Do you know anything about him, other than that he's Muslim? I don't.
To: zarf
He's been a national hero since 9/11....the essential man. I'd like to know more. What have you got?
To: Orange1998
What is your problem with Khalilizad? He is a tough as you can be.
30
posted on
12/09/2006 8:51:43 AM PST
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: zarf
Well, doing a Google search I see there is an article at Counterpunch that deems Khalilzad "The Neocon's Bagman to Baghdad" - so maybe he's not so bad after all...:)
31
posted on
12/09/2006 8:51:49 AM PST
by
veronica
(http://images20.fotki.com/v360/photos/1/106521/3848737/gladysPSCP-vi.jpg)
To: ClaireSolt
What a bunch of bigots!
You're talking about fundamentalist Muslims, right?
To: Right_in_Virginia
"Who knows, it could encourage Muslims in the U.S. to do the same."
But American Muslims already think they are standing up for the U.S. That's why they voted Democrat. ;)
33
posted on
12/09/2006 8:52:28 AM PST
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: veronica
A native of Afghanistan, he has served in government posts dating back to 1985 and is the highest-ranking Muslim in the Bush administrationCan he be trusted? Where are his highest and strongest loyalties?
34
posted on
12/09/2006 8:52:41 AM PST
by
mjp
Comment #35 Removed by Moderator
To: jveritas
I am glad to see this as a possibility as well.
36
posted on
12/09/2006 8:53:58 AM PST
by
KC Burke
(Men of intemperate minds can never be free...their passions forge their fetters.)
To: AmericaUnite
What, specifically, has he done to save Afghanistan and Iraq?Try Google...it's a new thing the kids have just come up with.
37
posted on
12/09/2006 8:54:46 AM PST
by
zarf
To: AmericaUnite
What, specifically, has he done to save Afghanistan and Iraq?Try Google...it's a new thing the kids have just come up with.
38
posted on
12/09/2006 8:54:47 AM PST
by
zarf
To: veronica
Good afternoon. This is off topic...
May the Lord hold ambassador Kirkpatrick in the palm of His hand, as she looks down on the disaster that is called the U.N.
5.56mm
39
posted on
12/09/2006 8:55:51 AM PST
by
M Kehoe
To: zarf
40
posted on
12/09/2006 8:56:45 AM PST
by
veronica
(http://images20.fotki.com/v360/photos/1/106521/3848737/gladysPSCP-vi.jpg)
To: flixxx
One paragraph from that link:
Khalilzad's close connections to Islamic extremists in South Asia and to the oil giant Unocal have been the subject of sharp criticism. As Truthout opined in a 2001 piece, "Simply put, Khalilzad's appointment means oil. Oil for the United States.
41
posted on
12/09/2006 8:57:44 AM PST
by
TomGuy
To: M Kehoe
Jeane Kirkpatrick is a real hero of mine, she was John Bolton and Maggie Thatcher rolled up into one. Truely a brilliant and devoted public servant who will be missed dearly.
To: veronica
"and is the highest-ranking Muslim in the Bush administration...."
APPEASEMENT continues
43
posted on
12/09/2006 8:58:15 AM PST
by
traumer
To: TomGuy
"Khalilzad's close connections to Islamic extremists in South Asia and to the oil giant Unocal have been the subject of sharp criticism. As Truthout opined in a 2001 piece, "Simply put, Khalilzad's appointment means oil. Oil for the United States."
And you find what wrong with this?
To: KC Burke
The man is serving now as our ambassador in the most violent part of the world, he can be killed at any moment, and he has been dealing with tough head Arabs for a long time, but some freepers do not see that he is tough enough for the job to be at the UN. If you can deal with hot headed people like the Iraqis you can definitely deal with the spineless UN.
45
posted on
12/09/2006 8:59:28 AM PST
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: traumer
What appeasement?
46
posted on
12/09/2006 9:00:10 AM PST
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: traderrob6
Glad to see your quoting Truthout. Quite the source of high minded, insightful commentary.
47
posted on
12/09/2006 9:01:45 AM PST
by
zarf
To: jveritas
Will he swear on this?
48
posted on
12/09/2006 9:01:58 AM PST
by
traumer
To: traderrob6
The only thing that appears to have many on this thread hysterical is the fact that he's Muslim which in my mind is NOT by itself indicative of untrustworthiness or inability to look out for our interests.Still, it does cause some (including me) to be concerned about his ultimate loyalty.
It does a man no service to place him in a position where he has to deny his god to serve his country.
49
posted on
12/09/2006 9:03:55 AM PST
by
null and void
(To succeed in life, you need three things: a wishbone, a backbone and a funnybone. --Reba McEntire)
To: flixxx
That link sure as hell ain't reassuring...
50
posted on
12/09/2006 9:05:30 AM PST
by
johnny7
("We took a hell of a beating." -'Vinegar Joe' Stilwell)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-200 ... 401-406 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson