Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Britain starts to drop US term 'war on terror,' report says (Foreign Office urges term usage cease)
AFP on Yahoo ^ | 12/9/06 | AFP

Posted on 12/09/2006 4:37:30 PM PST by NormsRevenge

LONDON (AFP) - Britain's Foreign Office is urging government officials to stop using the US term "war on terror" amid concerns it angers British Muslims and undermines government aims, a weekly newspaper said.

The government wants to "avoid reinforcing and giving succour to the terrorists' narrative by using language that, taken out of context, could be counter-productive," a Foreign Office spokesman told The Observer.

The Foreign Office has sent the same message to cabinet ministers as well as diplomats and other government representatives around the world, according to the report.

"We tend to emphasize upholding shared values as a means to counter terrorists," the spokesman was quoted as saying.

Many British officials and experts, the weekly said, suspect that Islamist extremists find it easier to recruit followers when western governments speak of a war on terror, by suggesting it is actually a war against Islam.

Gary Hindle, terrorism expert at the Royal United Services Institute in London, hailed the decision to drop the term, though it was not clear whether it was being widely carried out.

"It's about time," Hindle told The Observer. "Military terminology is completely counter-productive, merely contributing to isolating communities. This is a very positive move."

The White House began referring to the "war on terror" in the weeks after Al-Qaeda attacked New York and Washington on September 11, 2001.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: britain; foreignoffice; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: NormsRevenge

Fine. And we'll stop using some terms that make no sense either. Like "United Kingdom" and "British Intelligence"...


21 posted on 12/09/2006 7:05:22 PM PST by D.P.Roberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Perhaps this will make the Brits feel better while they live in their fool's paradise. Me I'd rather know the truth.


22 posted on 12/09/2006 8:00:37 PM PST by xowboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

'War on Terror' has always been too vague for me.


23 posted on 12/10/2006 4:30:20 AM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chiller
Britian will accept sharia law and Islam long before it threatens the US.

When will this happen? Be specific.

24 posted on 12/10/2006 4:31:43 AM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Porterville
I hope the Euro-weaklings get that smug liberal smile slapped off their stupid suicidal faces.

Oh, that's not a problem. Getting the liberals out of America's Congress (after patriotic Americans voted them in there) will be a bigger feat. But I understand the necessity some conservatives feel to stick a finger in the eye of someone else when things are not going well at home. America's hunky-dory. It's the rest of the world that's messed up.

25 posted on 12/10/2006 4:34:18 AM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: D.P.Roberts
And we'll stop using some terms that make no sense either.

'We?' I speak only for myself. Who else are you representing?

26 posted on 12/10/2006 4:35:25 AM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Another ISG talking point in the making.


27 posted on 12/10/2006 4:36:17 AM PST by TADSLOS (Mohammed was the L. Ron Hubbard of his time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I think we should stop using the "war on terror" phrase also. It's far too abstract and obtuse, like the "war on drugs". We are at war with terrorists and the nation states who support them- or, at least, we should be. Of course, we don't wantot be too harsh or hurt sensibilities, so we market it as a "war on terror".


28 posted on 12/10/2006 4:40:54 AM PST by TADSLOS (Mohammed was the L. Ron Hubbard of his time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS

wantot = want to. Typing too fast. Not enough coffee.


29 posted on 12/10/2006 4:42:25 AM PST by TADSLOS (Mohammed was the L. Ron Hubbard of his time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

We CAN'T win a "War against Terror" until we win a "War against Political Correctness". If you can't demonize your enemy then you've lost a means of fighting him.


30 posted on 12/10/2006 4:50:20 AM PST by BuffaloJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son

Me and your mom.


31 posted on 12/10/2006 5:37:00 AM PST by D.P.Roberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG
It won't be long before we will do the same.

January 2009, perhaps?

32 posted on 12/10/2006 5:43:07 AM PST by Steel Wolf (As Ibn Warraq said, "There are moderate Muslims but there is no moderate Islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son

No specifics, just before it happens here. What's your point? Mine is that Britian is acting like our canary in the coalmine, imho.


33 posted on 12/10/2006 6:31:01 AM PST by chiller (Old Media is not yet dead. Turn them off and they will die. For the sake of sanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
amid concerns it angers British Muslims

Unless one is a terrorist, why would one be offended by the term "war on terror"?

34 posted on 12/10/2006 7:09:28 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
I prefer the term 'Crusade,' myself.

I'm sorry, but that photo is laughable, given Bush said--a mere six days after 9/11--"Islam is Peace", while taking his shoes off in a flithy D.C. mosque.

35 posted on 12/10/2006 7:12:07 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son

There is nothing that can be done to save the increasingly misnamed "Great" Britain.

The only thing to be debated is wether you will surrender to Brussels before you surrender to someone else.

I hear that you may be withdrawing from the JSF program too.

Well, good riddance.


36 posted on 12/10/2006 7:17:27 AM PST by Axlrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
the US term "war on terror" amid concerns it angers British Muslims

Perhaps we need to apply some persuasion.


37 posted on 12/10/2006 7:17:41 AM PST by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Well, what he says publically for political reasons and what he actually thinks are two different things. The man did take down both the Taliban and Saddam, and also straightened Khadafi up, so you have to at least give him credit for that.


38 posted on 12/10/2006 7:31:41 AM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner ("Si vis pacem para bellum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

"Nevil Chamberli would be orgasmic."

No, he wouldn't be - he learned his lesson the hard way. Our present day politicians are the new breed of Chamberlains.


39 posted on 12/10/2006 8:21:18 AM PST by 353FMG (I never met a liberal I didn't dislike.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Three Million Will Flee Britain To Retire Abroad
40 posted on 12/10/2006 9:23:32 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson