Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Dan Phillips is an Assistant Professor of Psychiatry at Mercer University School of Medicine in Macon, Georgia. He specializes in the treatment of alcohol and drug addiction and obsesses about politics on the side.
1 posted on 12/10/2006 3:34:45 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07; Torie

**PING**


2 posted on 12/10/2006 3:52:50 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Luis Gonzalez

Interesting article. It sounds like I fall into a wide variety of the categories though. I wish there was some little test you could take to give you a better idea of where you really are.


3 posted on 12/10/2006 3:53:19 PM PST by Bluegrass Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Luis Gonzalez
[...] the three areas where paleos are most commonly recognized as differing from “regular conservatives.” They were early strong opponents of immigration, a position which is now becoming in vogue. They were skeptical of the benefits of free-trade, and favored a policy of “economic nationalism.” They were particularly weary of free-trade deals that they believed sacrificed our national sovereignty such as NAFTA and GATT. And of course, they opposed most foreign intervention.

You can see how paleoconservatism came to be largely defined by its positions on issues where it was at variance with the neocons [...]

Paleo bump.

4 posted on 12/10/2006 4:00:11 PM PST by A. Pole (H.L. Mencken: "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Luis Gonzalez

Excellent article. It is refreshing to read someone who deals in ideas and specifics instead of invective. Most of those who are so quick to call names probably don't understand what the labels mean to begin with. This was a refreshing change.


5 posted on 12/10/2006 4:01:03 PM PST by Always A Marine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paleo Conservative

Ping


6 posted on 12/10/2006 4:22:51 PM PST by proud_yank (Socialism - An Answer In Search Of A Question For Over 100 Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Luis Gonzalez

Interesting although redundant; modern "conservatism/rightism" has always been a loose coalition of traditionalists, libertarians, and anti-communists. Getting agreement among conservatives is "herding wildcats" as someone once said. The lefties stay in goosestep much more effectively.


10 posted on 12/10/2006 5:09:48 PM PST by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Paleos generally reject the Enlightenment in whole or in part.

Interesting thought. He may be on to something. Although no Paleo, Dennis Prager lashed out at the Enlightenment on his radio show. It surprised me. Although some hate to admit it, the founding fathers founded this country on Enlightenment principles, rather right down the line.

15 posted on 12/10/2006 6:09:12 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Luis Gonzalez

Paleoconservative used to mean one thing. In the last few years, the meaning has apparently changed to, "socialist."


16 posted on 12/10/2006 6:10:21 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Luis Gonzalez; Bluegrass Conservative; A. Pole; Always A Marine; proud_yank; Wilhelm Tell; ...
"Paleos generally reject the Enlightenment in whole or in part. They reject Lockean “contract theory” and the concept of “natural rights” out right."

This just seems false. I don't think I've ever run across a paleoconservative who didn't acknowledge "natural rights" (perhaps God-given etc.), i.e. not merely posited and arbitrary to be dispensed as public employees wish. And as for John Locke's hypotheses about 'the social contract' etc. most paleoconservatives I think would find those ideas about ethically binding implied consent to be at least as tenable as anything to the contrary. Am I overlooking something about "Lockean contract theory"?

18 posted on 12/10/2006 6:14:57 PM PST by ProCivitas (ProFamily + FairTrade: Duncan Hunter for President in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Good essay. You can see the echoes of the conflict between paleos, grassroots, neocons and mere partisans here at FR.

Interesting that Duncan Hunter is embracing the economic nationalism portion of the paleo agenda. His position on immigration is weak but he hasn't articulated a general view of foreign policy. It will be interesting to watch even if he is such a long shot.
24 posted on 12/10/2006 6:51:41 PM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Luis Gonzalez

I'm re-reading Kirk right now. I like him, but I find myself disagreeing with him at times, mostly as a matter of emphasis. I don't consider myself a classic conservative, I lean toward classic liberalism, I think.

I find my thoughts reflected in Locke, Burke, Hayek, I admire Lincoln, I'm a Christian, and I recognize and accept the tensions and contradictions that go with those.

I'm pro-immigration, but I want the border secured.


35 posted on 12/10/2006 7:28:31 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Luis Gonzalez

Paleo-conservatives = Pat Buchanan, David Duke and their kind, including Europeans who complain about "neo-cons."


37 posted on 12/10/2006 9:36:08 PM PST by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Luis Gonzalez

Labels are so....Neo-paleo ;'}


41 posted on 12/10/2006 10:27:37 PM PST by rockrr (Never argue with a man who buys ammo in bulk...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Luis Gonzalez
At least the author admits that the term "paleoconservative" is a neologism for a disperate coalition, not an actual idology.
It consists of Northern Elitists, Southern Agrarians, religious populists, and atheist libertarians.

Personally, I don't consider Gottfried to be a Paleoconservative, since his reaction is not to neoconservatives but to the Franfurt School.

PS. Chronicles and the Rochford Instituite were copted by paleos 15 years before The American Dhimmi was founded by the cokehead greek shipping magnate.

43 posted on 12/11/2006 1:16:11 AM PST by rmlew (Having slit their throats may the conservatives who voted for Casey choke slowly on their blood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Luis Gonzalez

bttt for later


49 posted on 12/11/2006 7:23:01 AM PST by TEXOKIE (Wear Red on Fridays to support the troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Luis Gonzalez

Your Score

Your scored 0 on the Moral Order axis and -5.5 on the Moral Rules axis.

Matches

The following items best match your score:

System: Conservatism, Liberalism
Variation: Economic Conservatism, Economic Liberalism
Ideologies: Conservative NeoLiberalism, Progressive NeoLiberalism
US Parties: Republican Party
Presidents: Ronald Reagan (90.89%)
2004 Election Candidates: John Kerry (79.63%), George W. Bush (77.79%), Ralph Nader (60.91%)
Statistics

Of the 262283 people who took the test:

0.9% had the same score as you.
79.7% were above you on the chart.
15.8% were below you on the chart.
28.5% were to your right on the chart.
59.5% were to your left on the chart.



Well I don't know how well I did or how bad I did, but it does say that Ronald Reagan would be someone I would vote for and that is good enough for me.


50 posted on 12/11/2006 7:24:51 AM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson