To: r9etb
Nature magazine. If you have performed a fact-based study showing a lesser number of dead Iraqis maybe we can work with your number. What is your number?
10 posted on
12/15/2006 7:38:52 AM PST by
MurryMom
To: MurryMom
If those numbers came from Nature Magazine, you should reconsider your subscription. MY number is 30,000. I got that from the White House briefing. I know for a fact, though, that a mathematician, who wishes to remain anonymous, puts the number at 125. Really, MM, do you believe that 15,000 Iraqi's per month have been killed since the start of the insurgency? More than the total number of German soldiers killed in WWII? More than the total number of American soldiers killed in WWII, the Korean War, and the Viet-Nam war, combined?
12 posted on
12/15/2006 7:48:48 AM PST by
jim35
("...when the lion and the lamb lie down together, ...we'd better damn sure be the lion")
To: MurryMom
14 posted on
12/15/2006 7:53:46 AM PST by
jim35
("...when the lion and the lamb lie down together, ...we'd better damn sure be the lion")
To: MurryMom
I'm not offering any numbers, as the topic of the moment is an investigation of your claim. Can you provide a link?
19 posted on
12/15/2006 9:13:54 AM PST by
r9etb
To: MurryMom
Calling that a "fact-based study" is like looking at the Boston Red Sox and calling them the Rockettes. The numbers are give or take 56%. Gimme a break.
Get educated here.
23 posted on
12/15/2006 11:25:42 AM PST by
Mr. Silverback
(We need to crush the Iraq Study Group like we crushed Harriet Miers. Let fly!)
To: MurryMom
Perhaps if they didn't include the dead Iranians, Syrians, Jordanians, so-called-Palestinians, Suadis, et al who came to fight for the terror cause....
28 posted on
12/15/2006 2:45:43 PM PST by
Darksheare
("I fear your smile and the promise it hides." See, she LOVES me!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson