Posted on 12/26/2006 8:12:00 PM PST by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
"Wayne"
But with space in such short supply at Arlington, I can see the point of the law. To have this man taking up space there is a slap in the face to the family of the victims. And having served in the military is not a "once saved, always saved" proposition (although John F'n Kerry seems to think so.)
The elderly couple, Daniel and Wilda Davis, opened their door to Russell Wayne Wagner on Valentines Day 1994.
He took Mom and Dad and sat them on a kitchen chair, tied their hands behind their heads and put a pillowcase over their heads, stabbed them 14-15 times and then he robbed them and then he left, their son, Vernon Davis, tearfully told the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee Thursday.
Wagner was convicted of the couples murders and sentenced to two life terms with parole eligibility. When he died in prison, he was cremated and placed in the nations premiere veterans cemetery: Arlington National Cemetery.
Yep. That's no good. Anybody with that middle name needs somebody to check in on them from time to time, lest they have a coed languishing in a pit in their basement.
Died of a heroin OD in prison?That's some great contraband control at that prison.Can't say he didn't deserve it though.....
I agree with the removal of his remains from Arlington.
Thank you for posting some more background to this story.
Are you expecting anyone to say that he deserves a space in our most hallowed cemetary?
If Bush signed a law eliminating a loophole in January 2006 and Wagner was buried there [using the loophole] in July 2005, it is a post-factum law. Ought to apply to the future burials only.
Well, I'll be the first to say it..
It's Bush's fault that they're digging up graves!
He'll probably end up in the same room in Hell as John WAYNE Gacy.
I noticed that.
However, for the specific case cited, I seem to remember something about "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed." in some dusty old historic document.
Like it or not.
See the post right below yours....
Probably the regulations are more relaxed for "cremains" because they take up so much less space, and this guy sifted through the cracks.
reactions and comments
Fine with me.
I'll bet that it would be fine with all other Vets there, too.
(you'll probably get a few "PTSD victim" apologists here, too)
It's not an ex post facto law. That would be criminalizing something you did which was legal at the time.
This is more like changing the zoning laws. You'd agree those can be changed, I'd think.
Live victims and dead heroes should trump dead murderers. Perhaps no one objected to a moral decision based on a loophole fix.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.