To: IrishMike
Gee, this is such a surprise.
The real question I have is why the US was covering for a murderous thug like Arafathead? Were they (laughing up my sleeve) "hoping to reform him" into a decent human being!!??
2 posted on
12/27/2006 5:20:26 AM PST by
DustyMoment
(FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
To: DustyMoment
Wasn't this guy Sadr wanted for murder when we went into Iraq and then he was just given a pass? Now he is operating a militia inside of a sovereign nation.
To: DustyMoment
"The real question I have is why the US was covering for a murderous thug like Arafathead?"
The answer is that the US state department has never met a murderous thug it didn't love. They are pretty much all socialist $hitheads who, if there were justice in the world, should all be hanged for treason.
28 posted on
12/27/2006 6:32:16 AM PST by
monday
32 posted on
12/27/2006 7:18:30 AM PST by
GretchenM
(What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his soul? Please meet my friend, Jesus)
To: DustyMoment
1973. Nixon. Realpolitik at work.
40 posted on
12/27/2006 9:48:21 AM PST by
arthurus
(Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE)
To: DustyMoment
The game is to brainwash Israelis and Americans that the PALS et al are really interested in peace, a two-state solution and Israeli compromise. It has worked very well and both the USA and Israel are being overwhelmed by the Islamofascists in deals as well as military conflicts. It is time to let Israel be Israel, fire Olmert and put BIBI back in charge to defeat these Islamic thugs.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson