Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq Hit 2,997 (Pro-Terrorist Liberal Media Rooting for More Dead Troops)
The AP via Breitbart.com ^ | December 29, 2006

Posted on 12/29/2006 8:45:42 PM PST by new yorker 77

As of Friday, Dec. 29, 2006, at least 2,997 members of the U.S. military have died since the beginning of the Iraq war in March 2003, according to an Associated Press count. The figure includes seven military civilians. At least 2,397 died as a result of hostile action, according to the military's numbers.

The AP count is 14 higher than the Defense Department's tally, last updated Friday at 10 a.m. EST.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 12/29/2006 8:45:46 PM PST by new yorker 77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

Three more and the Commie crowd down at the DNC's Ass. Press will be popping corks.


2 posted on 12/29/2006 8:48:19 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (When I was a kid, "global warming" was known as "the weather.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

About time for the A.P. to send an intern down to the party store for balloons and funny hats.


3 posted on 12/29/2006 8:48:55 PM PST by A Balrog of Morgoth (With fire, sword, and stinging whip I drive the RINOs in terror before me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

If they want three more, they can count the soldiers killed here at home in training exercises or how about those killed in Afghanistan.


4 posted on 12/29/2006 8:50:17 PM PST by new yorker 77 (Speaker Pelosi - Three cheers for Amnesty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

You mean we finally surpassed the 2973 fatalities from that 4 hr pd on 9/11?

Cindy Sheehan must be having a hot flash.......


5 posted on 12/29/2006 8:50:54 PM PST by Tx Angel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
... or how about those killed in Afghanistan

You're forgetting, the war in Afghanistan, is the good war.

6 posted on 12/29/2006 8:53:20 PM PST by pnh102
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

The MSM can't even wait for the big round number to begin the orgasm they've been waiting for. I didn't think I could hate them any more. I was wrong.


7 posted on 12/29/2006 8:54:01 PM PST by RedQuill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
War is hell, and people are going to be killed. We can look for an escalation in combat related deaths due to the hanging of Saddam. Is it worth it? Not only yes, but ---- yes!
8 posted on 12/29/2006 8:54:06 PM PST by Coldwater Creek (The TERRORIST are the ones who won the midterm elections!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

That is almost as many as we lost the first day of WWII at Pearl Harbor and Manilla.

Americans now want easy victories. Any thing less means we must run home and hide under the bed.


9 posted on 12/29/2006 8:54:26 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (When someone burns a cross on your lawn the best firehose is an AK-47.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedQuill

They are truly the scum at the bottom of the barrel in this country.


10 posted on 12/29/2006 8:58:07 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (When I was a kid, "global warming" was known as "the weather.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tx Angel
Now if we could only reach the same ratio of 400,000 killed in WWII in 39 months in response to the 2,403 killed at Pearl Harbor then the media would really be happy.

Too bad for the media that we have lost 2,997 in 46 months in Iraq. Now nearly 2 million have served in Iraq so that is less than the 16 million who served in WWII. So if we multiply 2,997 by 8, we are still at 24,000, which is 95% less than that of WWII at the same rate.

What "failures" our troops are in this "lost cause".
11 posted on 12/29/2006 8:58:21 PM PST by new yorker 77 (Speaker Pelosi - Three cheers for Amnesty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

Let them whine- while 3000 or so dead is no small thing- it is still darn good for what? 5 years of war now? That is just testament to how highly trained our military is to have had so little killed in that long period of time http://sacredscoop.com


12 posted on 12/29/2006 9:00:31 PM PST by CottShop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

3,475 American soldiers died for Korea's freedom in one month (November, 1950).

Democratic president Truman sent them there to handle a "police action" against "bandits."

13 posted on 12/29/2006 9:41:24 PM PST by syriacus (30,000 US deaths in Korea in 2 1/2 years under Truman (Jul, 1950 - Dec, 1952))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Americans hoping for more dead U.S. troops?

Many (most?) liberals are insufferably egregious. They really, really do feeeeeeeeeeeel that U.S. military misfortunes are worth the lives of other Americans' sons and daughters:

In a letter to the editor of the San Francisco Chronicle, one [redacted] of Mill Valley, Calif., says that some things are worth the lives of other people's sons and daughters:

"The constant loss of U.S. soldiers in Iraq--after the war is "won"--is a tragedy. However, if this is what it takes to retire the Bush administration at the next election, the sacrifice is justified."

reported by JAMES TARANTO Friday, July 11, 2003

Then, among many others, there's Rat stalwart (emphasis on the wart), Ellen Ratner (emphasis on the Rat):

"ELLEN RATNER SAYS SHE HOPES WAR IN IRAQ GOES BADLY FOR U.S."

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/813218/posts

14 posted on 12/29/2006 9:50:52 PM PST by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
2,397 died as a result of hostile action

I didn't think I would ever see an ACCURATE report of the KIA's. The MSM always uses the LARGER number that includes natural and other non combat deaths.

I can only surmise the KIA number is now "HIGH" enough for them to report the distinction......once in awhile.

15 posted on 12/29/2006 9:57:12 PM PST by PISANO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
....or how about those killed in Afghanistan.

There have been 194 US KIA's in Afghanistan with 65 this year.

16 posted on 12/29/2006 10:06:32 PM PST by PISANO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
Let's start drafting Progressive Liberals. Then it will give them something real to whine about.
17 posted on 12/29/2006 10:12:34 PM PST by Doc91678 (Doc91678)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

The countdown to 3000 has been happening for a year now but they couldn't skip 2997 and let the Saddam Execution take the whole run of the night.


18 posted on 12/29/2006 10:17:12 PM PST by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson