Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Children Take Forefront of Health-Care Plan. (Democrats push towareds universal healthcare)
Wall Street Journal ^ | Dec. 30, 2006 | JANE ZHANG

Posted on 12/30/2006 11:50:25 AM PST by FairOpinion

Democrats in Congress, itching to expand health coverage, will likely start by tackling the most politically appealing group: uninsured children.

For Democrats, covering these youngsters has obvious appeal. It would allow lawmakers to champion solutions to problems of people who they say have been a low priority for Republicans. It also would be a step toward universal health coverage, an old and elusive goal of many in the party.

Many Democrats want both to ensure that youngsters already covered keep coverage and to broaden the program to pick up all uninsured children, regardless of income. "We should reach across party lines to agree on universal health care for children," Rahm Emanuel, the Illinois Democrat who led the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, and Bruce Reed, president of the centrist Democratic Leadership Council, wrote in their campaign manifesto, "The Plan."

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: children; congress; democrats; grandstanding; healthcare; socializedmedicine; universalhealthcare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

What happened to the responsibility of the partent, who have money for cable TV, but not to insure their children?!

1 posted on 12/30/2006 11:50:27 AM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Recommended reading:


Understanding Poverty in America

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Welfare/bg1713.cfm

The following are facts about persons defined as "poor" by the Census Bureau, taken from various government reports:

Forty-six percent of all poor households actually own their own homes. The average home owned by persons classified as poor by the Census Bureau is a three-bedroom house with one-and-a-half baths, a garage, and a porch or patio.

Seventy-six percent of poor households have air conditioning. By contrast, 30 years ago, only 36 percent of the entire U.S. population enjoyed air conditioning.

Only 6 percent of poor households are overcrowded. More than two-thirds have more than two rooms per person.
The average poor American has more living space than the average individual living in Paris, London, Vienna, Athens, and other cities throughout Europe. (These comparisons are to the average citizens in foreign countries, not to those classified as poor.)

Nearly three-quarters of poor households own a car; 30 percent own two or more cars.

Ninety-seven percent of poor households have a color television; over half own two or more color televisions.

Seventy-eight percent have a VCR or DVD player; 62 percent have cable or satellite TV reception.

Seventy-three percent own microwave ovens, more than half have a stereo, and a third have an automatic dishwasher.

As a group, America's poor are far from being chronically undernourished. The average consumption of protein, vitamins, and minerals is virtually the same for poor and middle-class children and, in most cases, is well above recommended norms.


2 posted on 12/30/2006 11:54:01 AM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
This is soooooooooooooooooo distorted and inaccurate that one ponders where to begin ... . There is NO REASON for anyone to be without health care. States have subsidized plans. You can purchase CHEAP insurance and be pooled with others for CHEAP rates. FREE shots and physicals are available.

All I can say is not this **** AGAIN!
3 posted on 12/30/2006 11:54:44 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

cable, cell phones, and cars with bling are important to everyone's wellbeing. Being responsible is overrated.


4 posted on 12/30/2006 11:55:46 AM PST by flashbunny (If the founding fathers were alive today, they'd be buying feathers and boiling tar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Thank you!

I lack the patience for such nonsense.

I hope others read the facts YOU presented.
5 posted on 12/30/2006 11:55:48 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Democrats in Congress, itching to expand health coverage, will likely start by tackling the most politically appealing group: uninsured children.

Governor Arnold (RINO) here in California wants health care for "all Californians", including illegal aliens. Gosh, here in illegal alien heaven, I wonder WHO will pay the bills?

6 posted on 12/30/2006 12:01:56 PM PST by janetgreen (NO AMNESTY EVER AGAIN!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Democrats in Congress, itching to expand health coverage, will likely start by tackling the most politically appealing group: uninsured children.

Typical methods of politicians. Start small and then grow. Happened with tobacco, smog testing (in some states), and on and on. All of government no matter what party is guilty of this crap. Watch out gun owners. That one is growing.

7 posted on 12/30/2006 12:05:38 PM PST by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

So .. here we go again with "it's for the children" garbage. As usual, the dems keep doing the same thing and expecting a different result .. I believe that's the formula for insanity.


8 posted on 12/30/2006 12:09:09 PM PST by CyberAnt (Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

I'm sure the off-spring of Democratic law-makers won't avail themselves
of that nasty old private health-care once Hillary!Care is passed.
(/sarc)


9 posted on 12/30/2006 12:10:52 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
my insurance plan covers all my children up to age 21...
They are taken care of no need for any special gov. help.
10 posted on 12/30/2006 12:12:40 PM PST by Gone_Postal (There's plenty of room for all God's creatures..right next to the mashed potatoes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Remember clueless liberals . . .

This is SHRILLERY'S scheme to insure ID IMPLANTs keeping close tabs on all her potential enemies and serfs.

All for the children, of course.


11 posted on 12/30/2006 12:13:34 PM PST by Quix (LET GOD ARISE AND HIS ENEMIES BE SCATTERED. LET ISRAEL CALL ON GOD AS THEIRS! & ISLAM FLUSH ITSELF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Don't worry about your children. The nanny state is always happy to take care of them for you.


12 posted on 12/30/2006 12:13:43 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (When I was a kid, "global warming" was known as "the weather.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Remember clueless liberals . . .

This is SHRILLERY'S scheme to insure ID IMPLANTs keeping close tabs on all her potential enemies and serfs.

All for the children, of course.

OOOOPS . . . . /sar


13 posted on 12/30/2006 12:13:52 PM PST by Quix (LET GOD ARISE AND HIS ENEMIES BE SCATTERED. LET ISRAEL CALL ON GOD AS THEIRS! & ISLAM FLUSH ITSELF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

I bought comprehensive coverage against my clothes wearing out. To my surprise, the premiums I paid were finally more than the cost of replacing my clothes. But, hey, I had the peace of mind knowing any sudden exposure of my undies due to a worn out patch was covered. I think everyone should have to have clothing insurance to keep my premiums down.


14 posted on 12/30/2006 12:17:45 PM PST by gcruse (http://garycruse.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gcruse

In nyc they already have a program like this its called healthstat and its pushed aggresively in the prisons,hospitals and daycare centers. This from the same man who is always crying about the city being broke.

Bumberg/Hillary whats the difference?


15 posted on 12/30/2006 12:23:08 PM PST by italianquaker (Democrats its time to fish or cut bait, no more blaming Prez Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: italianquaker

Healthstat replaces you clothes if they wear out too fast?


16 posted on 12/30/2006 12:25:12 PM PST by gcruse (http://garycruse.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
I saw a big, whiny "news program" with Oprah Winfrey the other day about some place called Pembroke, Illinois. They were talking about the poverty level there, how everyone is poor, there's no health care (the town is practically deserted, why would there be any services there?), and the average wage is $9,000 per year (of course not counting WIC, AFDC, yada, yada, yada).

My immediate thought is, why the HELL would anyone live in such a sh!thole? It's not like this is Communist Russia (not yet, anyway, but it will be if the libs get their way). Nearly everyone in the feature had an automobile. They could get a (subsidized by the taxpayer) education, get a decent job, and GET THE HELL OUT OF THERE.

Yes, I'm screaming. I didn't grow up that poor, but you can be sure I didn't grow up with anything to call my own, either. I did it. If I can do it, anyone can do it. I'm so sick of hearing about the "downtrodden", who are mostly poor due to their own bad decisions. This country is crying out for welders and truck drivers, both jobs attainable by persons of normal intelligence.

They profiled a woman who had I believe seven children. Why have children you can't support? Who forced her to do that? Condoms (God knows liberals worship condoms as a sacramental garment) are cheap compared to child rearing. And everyone knows about condoms thanks to public schools and billboards that scream them into my car windows when I drive down the highway.

17 posted on 12/30/2006 12:29:02 PM PST by Hardastarboard (Hey! What happened to my tagline?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gcruse

Who knows


18 posted on 12/30/2006 12:34:52 PM PST by italianquaker (Democrats its time to fish or cut bait, no more blaming Prez Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

>>What happened to the responsibility of the partent, who have money for cable TV, but not to insure their children?!

Wow, I never knew cable TV cost $450 monthly.


19 posted on 12/30/2006 12:36:28 PM PST by struggle ((The struggle continues))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nmh

Last time I checked, every hospital bill I get contains additional charges for indigents and other uninsured individuals who need the hospital.



20 posted on 12/30/2006 1:04:16 PM PST by EQAndyBuzz ("Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted." Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson