I don't think that President Nixon offered President Ford a deal in exchange for the presidency. I know General Haig and worked for him, so I believe him.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Woodward has always come up with unverifiable claims that many do not believe.
2 posted on
12/31/2006 8:10:33 PM PST by
Sherri-D
(My beloved is mine and I am his. Song of Solomon 2:16)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
How convenient that the two people who could confirm this are dead.
3 posted on
12/31/2006 8:12:04 PM PST by
Lunatic Fringe
(Say "NO" to the Trans-Texas Corridor)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Woodward is to journalism what Morris is to campaigns and polls. They both are out to lunch.
4 posted on
12/31/2006 8:15:34 PM PST by
taxesareforever
(Never forget Matt Maupin)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
"Woodward responded: "Well, first of all, one of the things Ford told me, which I published a number of years ago, is that he believes, he, Gerald Ford, believed that Al Haig offered him a deal."
Was he heavily medicated at the time (or does he always talk gibberish?!)
5 posted on
12/31/2006 8:19:09 PM PST by
rockrr
(Never argue with a man who buys ammo in bulk...)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
What deal could be struck? President Nixon broke the law and they had the goods on him. VP Ford was going to become POTUS one way or another. Nixon knew it, Ford knew it and Haig knew it.
6 posted on
12/31/2006 8:19:43 PM PST by
jwalsh07
(Duncan Hunter for President)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I'd have to mull it over about one second whether to believe General Haig or Woodward.
General Haig is a man of integrity.
7 posted on
12/31/2006 8:22:56 PM PST by
jazusamo
(http://warchronicle.com/TheyAreNotKillers/DefendOurMarines.htm)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Somebody should pardon Woodward.
8 posted on
12/31/2006 8:24:18 PM PST by
AmishDude
(It doesn't matter whom you vote for. It matters who takes office.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
That "Deepthroat" business of the planter being moved or not moved was enough to convince me not to give much credence to what Woodward says.
10 posted on
12/31/2006 8:27:10 PM PST by
fso301
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Woodward makes Dan Rather look like an innocent.
12 posted on
12/31/2006 8:35:54 PM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
"The idea of an investigation, indictment, possible jailing of Nixon would consume the country for another two years." That is the simple and straight of it all, and to say otherwise is to suggest that Ford himself was as dishonest as any other politician serving in government.
Ford was going to be president,and he had the authority (like it of not) to pardon anyone he wanted.
Nixon's indiscretions never were of a nature that demanded he be jailed, and history bears witness that Ford did the proper thing, by pardoning Nixon.
Woodward has always pedaled an agenda in his reporting, and history will finally prove this assertion as well.
13 posted on
12/31/2006 8:40:27 PM PST by
Hillarys nightmare
(So Proud to be living in "Jesus Land" ! Don't you wish everyone did?)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I am sure Bob Woodward was also in Sandy Bergers pants. And can prove that no documents were shoved in there. Maybe he was also in the oval office and can attest to the common liberal belief that Bills privates never entered Monica. Hey Bob can you also assure us that Vince Foster was not murdered. If you say it surely we will all believe it.
20 posted on
12/31/2006 9:08:47 PM PST by
cquiggy
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Woodward is simply bleeding the MSM for every book sale he can squeeze out.
25 posted on
01/01/2007 12:54:55 AM PST by
AZRepublican
("The degree in which a measure is necessary can never be a test of the legal right to adopt it.")
To: 2ndDivisionVet
This only proves that if you repeat a lie often enough, it is believed. In Woodward's case, he believes his own lies as soon as he prints them.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson