1 posted on
01/02/2007 3:24:55 PM PST by
blam
To: SunkenCiv
2 posted on
01/02/2007 3:25:26 PM PST by
blam
To: SunkenCiv
3 posted on
01/02/2007 3:27:29 PM PST by
xcamel
(Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
To: blam
Joe Harl, of the Archaeological Research Center of St. Louis, said the size of the hook suggests the fisherman who used it was after a larger fish. Now don't go too far out on the limb, Joe.
4 posted on
01/02/2007 3:28:13 PM PST by
blau993
To: blam
How does he really know it's a fishing hook?
;) Any pictures?
5 posted on
01/02/2007 3:28:33 PM PST by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
To: blam
The hook is made of bone and covers his entire palm, making it much larger than most bone hooks.Obviously a muskie fisherman.
6 posted on
01/02/2007 3:29:14 PM PST by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: blam
Heck, I'm just touched that father and son's are spending quality time together. Go Daddy!!!!!!!
To: blam
What a find! I'm jealous.
12 posted on
01/02/2007 3:42:54 PM PST by
Ditter
To: blam
13 posted on
01/02/2007 3:47:51 PM PST by
BallyBill
(Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
To: blam
To: blam
Nice! My guess is far less than 12,000 years.
Bone can be radiocarbon dated. Won't take much bone, but would cost about $675 at the main US commercial lab.
Coyote
16 posted on
01/02/2007 3:59:11 PM PST by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: blam
Henley credits his sons, 11 and 6, for being good-luck charms because he made the discovery on the first trip the boys had joined their dad for an artifact hunt.Maybe he should have his "good-luck charms" tote shovels and screens when he next loots aboriginal graves on Public Lands.
This creep needs a whopping fine and/or jail time to teach him this simple lesson:
You cannot steal our heritage from our property for your shoebox.
17 posted on
01/02/2007 4:02:18 PM PST by
Tinian
To: blam
18 posted on
01/02/2007 4:04:36 PM PST by
scottdeus12
(Jesus is real, whether you believe in Him or not.)
To: blam
I guess he stuck it up on the bill of his baseball hat.
19 posted on
01/02/2007 4:06:09 PM PST by
Crawdad
(Is this thing on?)
To: blam
And when he told his buddies one of them said: "That's nothing, I once caught a fishhook this big!"
24 posted on
01/02/2007 4:14:16 PM PST by
mrsmith
To: blam
26 posted on
01/02/2007 4:18:28 PM PST by
jsh3180
To: blam
(300-12,000 Years Old)Sorry, but even if it were Adam's hook (which is quite unlikely), it could of been 6,600 years old at the most!
37 posted on
01/02/2007 4:36:40 PM PST by
Revolting cat!
(We all need someone we can bleed on...)
To: blam
Carpe carp!
43 posted on
01/02/2007 4:54:04 PM PST by
UnklGene
To: blam; FairOpinion; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 24Karet; 3AngelaD; 49th; ...
83 posted on
01/02/2007 11:02:37 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(Ahmedumbass and the mullahcracy is doomed. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: blam
and,..... it might be a hoax.
86 posted on
01/03/2007 5:06:43 AM PST by
bert
(K.E. N.P. .... you'll run the bill up kid!....)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
