Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill Clinton authorized Sandy Berger's access
WorldNetDaily ^ | January 4, 2007 | By Chelsea Schilling

Posted on 01/03/2007 11:48:07 PM PST by Jim Robinson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 361-370 next last
To: endthematrix

"Berger said he put in over 100 unpaid hours of his time to be responsive. "

Who are they kidding?
These guys don't have UNPAID hours, there's a PAYOFF to
everything they do.

Scumbag should be rotting in the Atlanta Pen, or hung like Saddam.


61 posted on 01/04/2007 3:00:40 AM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Geez, the guy should have done jail time.


62 posted on 01/04/2007 3:02:28 AM PST by JoeGar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I'll gladly join your team. They other name was almost certainly Bruce Lindsay, Mr. Fix-it, who cut his teeth as leader of the Bimbo-Brigade.

and Lindsay would never be as sloppy about it as Berger. We need a Hall of Infame... to include the likes of such RATS as Bert Lance, Bruce Lindsay, Sandy Berger, Janet Reno, Craig Livingstone, Bill Richardson, (Clinton's former Labor secr. ,etc.)

Anyon know how Bruce earns his living these days beyond his contiued Clinton pay.


63 posted on 01/04/2007 3:08:32 AM PST by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Give it up! No one is going to prosecute any Clinton criminal. We will just have to wait for the natural consequences to take place, and they will at some point.
64 posted on 01/04/2007 3:11:36 AM PST by Coldwater Creek (The TERRORIST are the ones who won the midterm elections!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piasa
I suppose that's true and it's an indictment of the cesspool we call Washington that they've all got crap on each other to that extent, or worse, as you're saying, they would expose agents to cover their sorry asses.

It's especially galling to me because I know of someone who was away from defense contracting for a while, did some heavy imbibing in substances, and then totally cleaned himself up without a rehab program. Upon returning to defense work, he encountered a questionnaire that asked if he did anything in the past seven years. All set to say yes, he noticed that saying yes also meant saying when, where and how many times. Unfortunately, it was not enough for him to simply say, "Yes, I did these things, but it's been 3, 4, 5 years since I did." Worse yet, ironically, he did it on his own so there was nothing he could offer as proof as no longer being where he was. In any event, he would have had to expose himself and his family and friends to a whole bunch of scrutiny and, certainly, a raft of questions on this particular subject. In the end, he decided it wasn't worth it and there went a potentially good career in defense.

Now before anyone piles on and says, "Hey, do stuff like that, get what you deserve," keep in mind that this guy was fine with those consequences because he brought it on himself. However, to see Sandy Berger brazenly destroy Presidential level classified material and not only get a slap on the wrist, but be allowed to get access again in three years is beyond infuriating.

It's a disgrace that regular people cannot make mistakes, but clymers like Berger can get away with crimes of the highest order. And there isn't a Republican with the stones to even mention it. Sickening.

65 posted on 01/04/2007 3:13:25 AM PST by Dahoser (Never question Mr. Nibbles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

There is more to this story than we know. The Archives claims that they have additional copies of all the documents Berger took, but I suspect that is not the full truth.


66 posted on 01/04/2007 3:35:19 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

I bet the redacted name is Hillary.


67 posted on 01/04/2007 3:36:48 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

He's off the hook Jim... it's too late.


68 posted on 01/04/2007 3:37:02 AM PST by johnny7 ("We took a hell of a beating." -'Vinegar Joe' Stilwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
"Later, Berger said if he had been asked to return the file 'it would have triggered a decision for him to give the documents back.'"

***

"Berger said if someone had always been with him, he would not have taken any documents."

I hadn't realized we were dealing with a child until I read these comments.

69 posted on 01/04/2007 3:50:31 AM PST by Donna Lee Nardo (DEATH TO ISLAMIC TERRORISTS AND ANIMAL AND CHILD ABUSERS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

I'm thinking the other designated agent is richard clarke.


70 posted on 01/04/2007 4:01:42 AM PST by Donna Lee Nardo (DEATH TO ISLAMIC TERRORISTS AND ANIMAL AND CHILD ABUSERS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I worked at the pentagon for two years and worked every day with top secret info. Had I even thought of pilfering or destroying any of the material I'd worked on I'd still be doing time in jail.
Why did this administrations justice dept give berger an essential pass?
Before being given such a clearence you are informed of the penelties for just such transgressions.
This stinks to high heaven.

Also thanks for F.R. Jim.


71 posted on 01/04/2007 4:07:35 AM PST by Joe Boucher (an enemy of islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dahoser
Remember that the "Bush" justice department contains a lot of career bureaucrats that are holdovers from Clinton's administration and before. I know that the justice department is at fault for their failure to prosecute Sandy Berger, but the MSM is also at fault for not doing their job. If he were a Republican, there would have been daily front page stories about this in the NYT.
72 posted on 01/04/2007 4:12:35 AM PST by srmorton (Choose life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Berger said if he had been asked to return the file "it would have triggered a decision for him to give the documents back."

and when I was 8 years old, if the dog barked twice,and someone gave me a red balloon,and my uncle promised to take me fishing.....I would put the cookie back. This is the kind of stuff you get from a former NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR

73 posted on 01/04/2007 4:14:09 AM PST by Doogle (USAF 68-73..408th MMS Ubon Thailand ..never store a threat you should have eliminated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
There is more to this story than we know. The Archives claims that they have additional copies of all the documents Berger took, but I suspect that is not the full truth.

I posted this the other day...I happened to see something very intriguing on another forum. A poster wrote that there were pdfs made of the stolen docs and that they were in safe hands just waiting to be revealed at an opportune moment in '08. And that Burglar and Bubba were trying to find out just who holds the goods. Did anyone else see this & think it's for real?
74 posted on 01/04/2007 4:16:30 AM PST by Miss Didi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Nancy P. will call for a new investigation in her first 100 hours.

/dreaming.


75 posted on 01/04/2007 4:16:46 AM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
There is more to this story than we know. The Archives claims that they have additional copies of all the documents Berger took, but I suspect that is not the full truth.

I posted this the other day...I happened to see something very intriguing on another forum. A poster wrote that there were pdfs made of the stolen docs and that they were in safe hands just waiting to be revealed at an opportune moment in '08. And that Burglar and Bubba were trying to find out just who holds the goods. Did anyone else see this & think it's for real?
76 posted on 01/04/2007 4:19:53 AM PST by Miss Didi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Miss Didi

Excuse the double post.


77 posted on 01/04/2007 4:20:42 AM PST by Miss Didi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

My opinion is, and has been, the Clintons must have a lot of dirt on Bush. The entire Justice Department career lawyers, who served under numerous Presidents, were sacked and replaced immediately upon Clinton taking the Presidency. Because Bush retained most of these Clinton loyalists, Scooter Libby has become the biggest national security risk during the last 6 years. Unbelievable!


78 posted on 01/04/2007 4:21:34 AM PST by moonman (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

bump


79 posted on 01/04/2007 4:23:29 AM PST by Former Proud Canadian (How do I change my screen name after Harper's election?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Didi

I can't imagine it's for real. Frankly, what the Archives says makes some sense. Basically, they say that unknown to Berger, they kept duplicate copies of everything.

But then if you look at those duplicate copies, and there is nothing particularly incriminating in them, you wonder why he would go to all this trouble to deep six them.

One report early on was that the Archives kept duplicate copies of the reports, but not of the particular copies of the reports that had handwritten notes on them. I don't know if that is true or not, but that's what the claim was. Maybe it was the handwritten notes he wanted to deep six. But I guess we'll never know.


80 posted on 01/04/2007 4:26:54 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 361-370 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson