Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Self-Snuffing Cigarettes To Prevent Fires
ClickonDetroit ^ | January 4, 2007

Posted on 01/04/2007 2:05:04 PM PST by ShadowDancer

New Self-Snuffing Cigarettes To Prevent Fires

Six States Requiring Safer Smokes

UPDATED: 2:42 pm EST January 4, 2007

STOCKTON, Calif. -- Many smokers are willing to walk a mile for a Camel, but will they be willing to puff a little harder?

A new California state law that took effect this week requires stores to sell cigarettes that are designed to go out if the smoker stops puffing or drops the cigarette.

Six states have adopted legislation requiring the self-snuffing smokes in an effort to prevent fires.

The new cigarettes have tiny paper bands through which flame is not supposed to burn without the smoker puffing on the cigarette. New York was the first state to require "fire-safe" cigarettes, in June 2004, according to the Sacramento Bee. Vermont, Illinois, New Hampshire and Massachusetts also passed similar laws.

The National Fire Protection Association said that three out of four fires caused by cigarettes could be averted with the safer variety.

Authorities said cigarettes are the leading cause of home fire fatalities, killing more than 700 people each year. One in three of the victims is a child, according so Sacramento TV station KCRA.

Regular cigaretes burn to the end, which can take 10 to 20 minutes. But a fire-safe cigarette stops within a minute after being puffed.

Robert Tuitavuki of the Stockton Fire Department said fires are often caused when people leave cigarettes unattended or fall asleep while smoking.

At some stores, owners have been hearing complaints from customers.

Sunil Sharma of Washington Market said he knows of one customer who stopped coming in because the cigarettes being sold are designed for safety.

Some smokers said they notice a difference in taste, but most said they would rather relight than quit smoking.

R.J. Reynolds and Philip Morris, two of the largest cigarette makers, want a uniform mandate across the United States. The mandate would be set by Congress, which, according to the paper, which has not taken action.

"We don't want to see a patchwork where states might implement different laws with different standards," John Singleton, communications director for Reynolds' parent firm, told the paper.

In 2005, the first full year that New York required the "fire-safe" cigarettes, the state reported a 10 percent reduction in the number of smoking-related fires, the paper reported. It also said that there was a 26 percent reduction in the number of smoking-related fire deaths, compared to the annual averages from 2000 through 2003.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antismoking; niconazis; tobacco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 01/04/2007 2:05:09 PM PST by ShadowDancer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ShadowDancer

I smoke self-snuffing cigarettes. I roll my own with 100% pure tobacco. No additives. Pure tobacco will not stay lit without constant puffing. Leave it to CA to reinvent the wheel. (and then prohibit you from using anything else)


2 posted on 01/04/2007 2:09:29 PM PST by TigersEye (This post is a coded message of the VRWC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

"Pure tobacco will not stay lit without constant puffing."


That's why my cigars have to be relit if they sit in the ashtray too long .


3 posted on 01/04/2007 2:11:38 PM PST by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ShadowDancer
"We don't want to see a patchwork where states might implement different laws with different standards"

i.e. we don't want to live in a republic but a centrally controlled bribe-ocracy run by lobbyists.

4 posted on 01/04/2007 2:18:18 PM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Long stem pipe with a blend of cherry and vanilla aromatic.


5 posted on 01/04/2007 2:18:31 PM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

Flammable ping!


6 posted on 01/04/2007 2:18:47 PM PST by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Disambiguator

What's next? Bullets that make self-healing wounds?


7 posted on 01/04/2007 2:20:08 PM PST by C210N (Bush SPIED, Terrorists DIED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ShadowDancer

I would think this would cause people to inhale deeper --- and thus cause more cancer.

Just a random thought.


8 posted on 01/04/2007 2:20:20 PM PST by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Lezahal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renegade

Exactly what I was going to say: cigars discovered this LONG ago: something about cigar tobacco that requires constant puffing. Never known a fire traceable to a cigar, except on that old Seinfeld episode involving a cabin in the woods. Probably a good thing as far as it goes. Stopped smoking 3 years ago, and I wish everyone would quit. Arsonists, however, will not be threatened because cigarettes were never their tool of choice.


9 posted on 01/04/2007 2:23:39 PM PST by supremedoctrine ("Talent hits a target no one else can hit, genius hits a target no one else can see"--Schopenhauer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Renegade

Exactly what I was going to say: cigars discovered this LONG ago: something about cigar tobacco that requires constant puffing. Never known a fire traceable to a cigar, except on that old Seinfeld episode involving a cabin in the woods. Probably a good thing as far as it goes. Stopped smoking 3 years ago, and I wish everyone would quit. Arsonists, however, will not be threatened because cigarettes were never their tool of choice.


10 posted on 01/04/2007 2:25:01 PM PST by supremedoctrine ("Talent hits a target no one else can hit, genius hits a target no one else can see"--Schopenhauer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Pure tobacco will not stay lit without constant puffing.

Give that man a ceegaar.

11 posted on 01/04/2007 2:25:54 PM PST by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gabz; SheLion

ping


12 posted on 01/04/2007 2:26:16 PM PST by jmc813 (Go Jets!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowDancer

It's the paper that keeps 'em burning.


13 posted on 01/04/2007 2:27:21 PM PST by Cobra64 (Why is the War on Terror being managed by the DEFENSE Department?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

The folks at the tobacco shop tell me it's the 200+ chemicals added to cigarettes that keep 'em burning.
I smoke cigars - all natural.


14 posted on 01/04/2007 2:41:43 PM PST by Abcdefg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe

Thanks! Oh my, it's a Macanudo Ascot! I think I'll smoke that right now.


15 posted on 01/04/2007 2:44:35 PM PST by TigersEye (This post is a coded message of the VRWC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

I smoke self-snuffing cigarettes. I roll my own with 100% pure tobacco. No additives. Pure tobacco will not stay lit without constant puffing.

ditto, Nat Sherman's and other "real" smokes

too much government regulation


16 posted on 01/04/2007 2:49:46 PM PST by WhiteGuy (GOP Congress - 16,000 earmarks costing US $50 billion in 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64
I used to have an article that described the chemicals in packaged cigarettes. There are over 800. Not 800 in each brand but 800+ used by manufacturers. Federal law requires that every manufacturer submit a list of which chemicals are in which cigarettes each year. Federal law also prohibits the government from releasing that info publicly. Something about prison time as I recall. (Guess it's worse than stealing national security documents because no one has ever done it.)

Anyway, some of those chemicals include benzenes of different types. You might have seen that listed on cans of automotive lacquers. It's the chemical that really gives that paint a wallop if you don't use a respirator. Some chemicals are used to alter the taste and others, like salt peter, are used to keep the tobacco burning.

17 posted on 01/04/2007 2:56:18 PM PST by TigersEye (This post is a coded message of the VRWC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ShadowDancer

Since my state switched to the "safer" cigarets, I've had more problems with possible fires than before. For example, yesterday I lit up, and immediately felt a burn on my hand. That "safe" cigaret did something I've never had happen before: It dropped an ember before it was even puffed on. If that had landed on paper I would have had a fast blaze going.

>>>Regular cigaretes burn to the end, which can take 10 to 20 minutes. But a fire-safe cigarette stops within a minute after being puffed.>>>

A minute is plenty of time for it to ignite the blanket, the chair, or whatever. I'm afraid these new cigarets will lead people into thinking it's safe to smoke when tired.


18 posted on 01/04/2007 2:59:12 PM PST by kitkat (The first step down to hell is to deny the existence of evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Disambiguator; Just another Joe; Madame Dufarge; Cantiloper; metesky; Judith Anne; lockjaw02; ...
Flammable ping!

To pay $45 to $60 dollars for one carton of cigarettes, only to have them packaged in this is totally outrageous!

19 posted on 01/04/2007 3:05:51 PM PST by SheLion (When you're right, take up the fight!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WhiteGuy
too much government regulation

Boy is that the truth. Tobacco is the biggest government conspiracy/cover-up/scam in US history. I smoke American Spirit. A great tobacco and it used to be a great company in the '90s. They wanted to get Native Americans in the southwest growing their tobacco (or part of it) to help the Indians and for the good promotional aspect of it. The feds slapped that idea right down. There are just so many federal permits for tobacco growing and they aren't making any more. The fact that Indian reservations are supposedly sovereign nations had zero gravity.

20 posted on 01/04/2007 3:05:55 PM PST by TigersEye (This post is a coded message of the VRWC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson