Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North Korea Prepping Nuclear Weapons Test(They've Put Everything in Place)
ABC News ^ | 01/04/06 | JONATHAN KARL

Posted on 01/04/2007 5:20:00 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster

North Korea Prepping Nuclear Weapons Test

Defense Officials Tell ABC News 'They've Put Everything in Place'

By JONATHAN KARL

WASHINGTON, Jan. 4, 2007 — - North Korea appears to have made preparations for another nuclear test, according to U.S. defense officials.

"We think they've put everything in place to conduct a test without any notice or warning," a senior U.S. defense official told ABC News.

The official cautions that the intelligence is inconclusive as to whether North Korea will actually go ahead with another test but said the preparations are similar to the steps taken by Pyongyang before it shocked the world by conducting its first nuclear test last Oct. 9.

Two other senior defense officials confirmed that recent intelligence suggested that the North Koreans appear to be ready to test a nuclear weapon again, but the intelligence community divides over whether another test is likely.

"That would surprise me," a senior intelligence official said when asked if North Korea is likely to soon conduct another test.

Another official had a different view, predicting North Korea would conduct a test sometime over the next two or three months.

In the weeks before the Oct. 9 test, U.S. spy satellites witnessed the unloading of large cables at a suspected test site in P'onggye, in northeastern North Korea. The more recent activity has been observed in the same area as the Oct. 9 test.

In October, the U.N. Security Council unanimously passed a resolution that imposed harsh sanctions against North Korea just six days after Kim Jong Il's regime declared that it conducted an underground nuclear test. The sanctions were designed to coerce North Korea into giving up its nuclear program.

Resolution 1718 specifically called for North Korea to abandon its nuclear weapons completely and irreversibly, as well as to put an end to its biological and chemical weapons, weapons of mass destruction, and ballistic missile programs.

The United States and Japan had pushed for stronger sanctions but eventually watered down the resolution to appease China and Russia, which feared that tougher sanctions might only make the situation worse.

The U.N. sanctions further mandated an embargo on major military hardware such as tanks, warships, combat aircraft and missiles to North Korea. To appease the Russian and Chinese delegations, however, the United States dropped its opposition to an all-out ban on conventional weapons.

The resolution also ruled out the possibility of military intervention -- a point critical to Russia and China, whose opposition to the initial drafts delayed the vote.

China, in particular, objected to a provision that would have allowed for the search of all cargo ships headed out of North Korea. The Chinese delegation maintained that intrusive searches could provoke further conflict in the region.

In response to these sanctions, North Korean Premier Yon Hyong Muk told the Security Council that the country needed nuclear weapons to protect itself from the danger of war with the United States, and that the Bush administration has responded to North Korea's "patient and sincere" efforts with sanctions and blockades. He said North Korea saw continued pressure from the United States as a declaration of war.

North Korean Gen. Ri Chan Bok told ABC News anchor Diane Sawyer that "the U.S. wants us to kneel down before them. We cannot agree with them. If this tension continues war cannot be avoided."

In response, White House press secretary Tony Snow made it clear that it is not uncommon for the North Koreans to use strong rhetoric.

"On the other hand, let me make clear to the people of North Korea and the entire world, not only do we not want North Korea to 'kneel down,' what we're trying to do is offer them a better deal -- better economy, more security, better relations with their neighbors, integration into the global community as opposed to isolation," Snow said.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2ndtry; korea; nkorea; northkorea; nucleartest; ready
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
First, the story of Khamenei's possible death, and now this. Things are moving again. Chia Head's new year bash is coming soon.
1 posted on 01/04/2007 5:20:04 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; OahuBreeze; yonif; risk; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 01/04/2007 5:20:38 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, kae jong-il, chia head, pogri, midget sh*tbag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Time for another fizzle in the hizzle, fo' shizzle.


3 posted on 01/04/2007 5:24:35 PM PST by Redcloak (Speak softly and wear a loud shirt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Don't think China will be amused if they do it.


4 posted on 01/04/2007 5:30:51 PM PST by AZRepublican ("The degree in which a measure is necessary can never be a test of the legal right to adopt it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; Jet Jaguar; All

Tiger is there any North Korea holiday coming up soon that probably reason chia Pet doing this


5 posted on 01/04/2007 5:33:45 PM PST by SevenofNine ("Step aside Jefe"=Det Lennie Briscoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SevenofNine
Re #5

Feb. 16: Chia Head's birthday.

6 posted on 01/04/2007 5:37:10 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, kae jong-il, chia head, pogri, midget sh*tbag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

It sounds like his birthday party is going to be a real "blast".


7 posted on 01/04/2007 5:45:23 PM PST by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

DAMN Chia Pet was born on my boss's birthday OH BOY wait till I tell him ROFL


8 posted on 01/04/2007 5:45:38 PM PST by SevenofNine ("Step aside Jefe"=Det Lennie Briscoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
I wonder if the Chinese are going to be happy when the Japanese test their first nuclear weapon? Morons. Do people really forget the horrors of nuclear weapons after only 60 years that they can be this cavalier about nuts getting their hands on them?
9 posted on 01/04/2007 5:46:16 PM PST by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster


10 posted on 01/04/2007 5:47:41 PM PST by TexKat (Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I hope we have, at the least, put China on notice that if they don't get their dog under control they can kiss MFN status goodbye.


11 posted on 01/04/2007 5:47:48 PM PST by Spruce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: rdl6989; TigerLikesRooster; All

Damn way North Koreans celebrate birthday is like here in WEST when party get wild they call the cops LOL!


13 posted on 01/04/2007 5:48:54 PM PST by SevenofNine ("Step aside Jefe"=Det Lennie Briscoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Question_Assumptions
Re #6

Chia Head only cares about his scorecard now. He just wants to stay on top in whatever way possible.

The guy has a case of Napoleon Complex, which is more serious than Napoleon's.

14 posted on 01/04/2007 6:02:08 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, kae jong-il, chia head, pogri, midget sh*tbag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Why does not NK light one up above ground... it's not like they would be breaking any treaties they have signed.


15 posted on 01/04/2007 6:04:52 PM PST by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TexKat

16 posted on 01/04/2007 6:05:51 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Well, it's 2007. Time to get ready for 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Oh, my - won't we even get the usual demand for aid or a reactor or something first? A demand for bilateral negotiations or else? Kimmie's slipping.


17 posted on 01/04/2007 6:07:58 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Why the hell we don't blow up the launch pad is beyond me. No launch pad - no test!


18 posted on 01/04/2007 6:10:53 PM PST by Pro-Bush (hater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
Re #17

Well, actually in the last round of 6-party talks, he made some demands, which includes unfreezing of his bank accounts in Macau, and another nuclear reactor.

Especially, he badly wanted his bank accounts back. He dis not get this way, and that is why he is about to do a firework show again.

On the other hand, he was planning to do another nuke test all along, and trying to find a good excuse, regardless of what happens to his bank accounts.

19 posted on 01/04/2007 6:14:24 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, kae jong-il, chia head, pogri, midget sh*tbag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Pro-Bush
Why the hell we don't blow up the launch pad is beyond me. No launch pad - no test!

Not to be snitty, but where exactly does one put the "launch pad" for an underground test?

20 posted on 01/04/2007 6:15:33 PM PST by thoolou (Secretary Rumsfeld was a man far better than the fickle nation he served. - BeHoldAPaleHorse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson