Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

San Francisco 49ers Announce Opposition to Senator Carole Migden’s SB 49
Sports Business News ^ | January 5, 2007

Posted on 01/05/2007 9:27:26 AM PST by ConservativeStatement

The San Francisco 49ers Thursday announced their strong opposition to legislation introduced in Sacramento by California State Senator Carole Migden.

The team’s opposition was joined by California State Senator Elaine Alquist, who represents most of Silicon Valley. Her 13th Senate district covers the cities of San Jose, Sunnyvale, Santa Clara, Mountain View, and Gilroy. “The 49ers are a Bay Area team and an important regional asset. I strongly oppose this legislation because it hurts our chances of keeping the team in the Bay Area.”

The legislation, entitled SB 49, is designed to limit the team’s ability to build a new stadium in the Bay Area outside of the city limits of San Francisco. If passed, the legislation would make it virtually impossible for the team to stay in the region.

(Excerpt) Read more at sportsbusinessnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: 49ers; football; migden; nfl; sanfrancisco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
The headline was altered to fit.

Migden's bio from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carole_Migden

1 posted on 01/05/2007 9:27:30 AM PST by ConservativeStatement
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

The full article in case link doesn't work:

The San Francisco 49ers Thursday announced their strong opposition to legislation introduced in Sacramento by California State Senator Carole Migden.
The team’s opposition was joined by California State Senator Elaine Alquist, who represents most of Silicon Valley. Her 13th Senate district covers the cities of San Jose, Sunnyvale, Santa Clara, Mountain View, and Gilroy. “The 49ers are a Bay Area team and an important regional asset. I strongly oppose this legislation because it hurts our chances of keeping the team in the Bay Area.”

The legislation, entitled SB 49, is designed to limit the team’s ability to build a new stadium in the Bay Area outside of the city limits of San Francisco. If passed, the legislation would make it virtually impossible for the team to stay in the region.

The bill proposed by Senator Migden would eliminate the opportunity for a Bay Area city other than San Francisco to develop a public-private partnership with the 49ers, which is crucial to the team’s ability to build a new stadium. It would apply exclusively to the San Francisco 49ers by exempting other professional sports leagues in the state and setting conditions that do not apply to other NFL teams.

“In effect, Senator Migden wants to draw a 100-mile circle around San Francisco to legislate a ‘no-49ers-stadium zone,’” said Executive Vice President of Football Operations Lal Heneghan. “If passed, the consequences of this legislation would be devastating for the 49ers and our fans throughout the Bay Area.”

In November, the team determined that a plan to build a new stadium and mixed-use development at San Francisco’s Candlestick Point would create too many transportation and parking headaches for the fans due to incompatible land requirements at the site and massive infrastructure deficiencies in the area. As a result, the team decided not to move forward with the public approval process for the project. In an effort to replace its current stadium, 46-year-old Monster Park, the team announced it would shift its focus to the nearby City of Santa Clara, which has served as the location of the 49ers’ headquarters and practice facility for over two decades.

“Our stadium is currently located in San Francisco and our roots run deep in the City, but the San Francisco 49ers have always been a regional team and a regional asset,” said Heneghan. More than 90 percent of the team’s season ticket holders live outside the City of San Francisco. 49ers players and staff live throughout the Bay Area, and the team’s community outreach and charitable programs are active throughout the region. “Make no mistake, the social and economic benefits of the San Francisco 49ers are important to the entire San Francisco Bay Area, not just the City of San Francisco.”

Later this month, the team will speak before the Santa Clara City Council and seek to begin a feasibility study with the City to explore the possibility of building a new stadium near the Santa Clara Convention Center and the Great America amusement park. The location is served by multiple forms of public transit and would offer easy access to fans from several freeways that connect throughout the Bay Area. Although the 49ers have stated that the site in Santa Clara will be its main focus, the team will continue to explore potential back-up sites in San Francisco and throughout the region.

The 49ers intend to vigorously fight the legislation and seek its immediate withdrawal. “We hope civic leaders from throughout the Bay Area will join us and our fans in opposing this legislation and work together with us to create opportunities rather than roadblocks,” said Heneghan.


2 posted on 01/05/2007 9:28:32 AM PST by ConservativeStatement
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

Could we see the Los Angeles 49ers?


3 posted on 01/05/2007 9:29:59 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

What business is it of the legislature where the 49ers put their ball park?


4 posted on 01/05/2007 9:30:31 AM PST by Not A Snowbird (Goodbye, Tomas. Sleep well. (? 1994-Dec 6, 2006))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle

A better question is, how did a liberal-infested swamp of a city have such a storied football team?


5 posted on 01/05/2007 9:32:23 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Why can't Republicans stand up to Democrats like they do to terrorists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

Very greedy of the San Franciscans legislators.


6 posted on 01/05/2007 9:33:05 AM PST by Jedi Master Pikachu ( WND, NewsMax, Townhall.com, and Drudge Report are not valid news sources.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

Very greedy of the San Franciscan legislators.


7 posted on 01/05/2007 9:33:31 AM PST by Jedi Master Pikachu ( WND, NewsMax, Townhall.com, and Drudge Report are not valid news sources.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu

Very greedy of the San Francisca legislators.

;-)


8 posted on 01/05/2007 9:35:15 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

I would assume the Bay Area would continue to be the 49ers' home. I'm not sure what is going on with the Vikings. A recent plan was eliminated but the yearning of ownership is to remain in Minnesota from what I have recently read.


9 posted on 01/05/2007 9:37:57 AM PST by ConservativeStatement
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
I would assume the Bay Area would continue to be the 49ers' home.

I'm sure that's the same thing they said about the Raiders in the late 70s/early 80s.

10 posted on 01/05/2007 9:40:12 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

The Irving Cowboys sneer in your anal-retentive direction.


11 posted on 01/05/2007 9:40:42 AM PST by gcruse (http://garycruse.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

The "Sacramento 49ers" has a nice ring to it.


12 posted on 01/05/2007 9:42:46 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
The "Sacramento 49ers" has a nice ring to it.

And makes a lot more sense, historically.

13 posted on 01/05/2007 9:45:33 AM PST by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
...legislation introduced in Sacramento by California State Senator Carole Migden.

Stoo-pid femi-Nazi, and 'married' lesbo to boot -- figures. Hell, why stop with the 49ers - why not introduce a Bill to outlaw men, huh 'Carole'?

No offense to female FReepers but it's women like this 'butch' - along with San Fran Nan, Hillary, Boxer, Rosie, Oprah, Jihad Cindy, etc. - that gives cause to repeal the 19th Amendment.

Some women are just incapable of rational thought and should not be allowed to vote, let alone hold public office. Especially like this man hating lesbo.

(again, female Freepers excluded)
(Asbestos pants *on* anyway)

14 posted on 01/05/2007 9:45:47 AM PST by Condor51 (Mayor Daley (D-Chi) For POTUS. Really, why not? He's more conservative than Rudy! /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

The Los Angeles 49ers of San Francisco?


15 posted on 01/05/2007 9:45:50 AM PST by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
The Irving Cowboys sneer in your anal-retentive direction.

You mean the Soon-To-Be-Arlington Cowboys.

16 posted on 01/05/2007 9:48:52 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
The Irving Cowboys sneer in your anal-retentive direction.

Soon to be the Arlington Cowboys of Six Flags Over Texas.

I'm just looking forward to the day they get rid of their "blimp hangar" at Valley Ranch (enclosed practice field). It's a real eyesore, particularly to those that live in the neighborhood.

17 posted on 01/05/2007 9:49:37 AM PST by Night Hides Not
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Damn, gator! 45 Freepin seconds!


18 posted on 01/05/2007 9:50:18 AM PST by Night Hides Not
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not

You gotta be quick here at FR.


19 posted on 01/05/2007 9:51:26 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not
I'm just looking forward to the day they get rid of their "blimp hangar" at Valley Ranch (enclosed practice field). It's a real eyesore, particularly to those that live in the neighborhood.

Ain't that the truth. It's a real nice neighborhood, and then "Whammo!" that monstrosity appears.

20 posted on 01/05/2007 9:52:40 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson