Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Giuliani fears ex-wife will hit presidential bid
London Times ^ | 1/7/07 | London Times

Posted on 01/07/2007 11:46:24 AM PST by wagglebee

THERE is one woman who could cause Rudy Giuliani, the former New York mayor, more problems than Hillary Clinton in the race for the White House: she is Donna Hanover, his second wife, writes Sarah Baxter.

Hanover, an actress and broadcaster, was enraged by Giuliani’s flagrant infidelity towards the end of their 18-year marriage and the divorce case was vicious. Giuliani’s advisers fear that she could be a loose cannon in the 2008 campaign.

Giuliani was acclaimed as the “mayor of America” for his heroic role during the attacks on September 11, 2001 and is revered for his leadership. At the time he was living in the spare room of an apartment belonging to gay friends after Hanover forced him out of Gracie Mansion, the official residence.

Hanover refused to confirm that she would vote for Giuliani as mayor of New York even when she was married to him. “What kind of wife is that?” Raoul Felder, Giuliani’s lawyer, fumed. “She’s essentially saying she’s not going to vote for him.”

Hanover once stood outside a shower at Gracie Mansion, expecting to confront Judith Nathan, Giuliani’s mistress, now his third wife. In the event, a startled golfing friend of Giuliani’s emerged.

Hanover was also accused of a lack of sympathy while the former mayor was battling prostate cancer, by banishing him to a spare bedroom and exercising noisily on a treadmill at 5am.

New Yorkers relished the details of Giuliani’s larger-than-life personal story. But conservative “values voters” could be different, as Giuliani’s own aides noted in a 140-page memo leaked last week by supporters of a rival candidate.

The campaign dossier suggested that Hanover could be one of several potentially “insurmountable” vulnerabilities that could cause him to drop out of the race. It was an embarrassing start to a campaign that is not yet officially under way.

Giuliani’s record in fighting crime and terrorism has placed him at the top of several polls for the 2008 Republican nomination, edging out Senator John McCain in popular support. But the party base may be turned off by his support for abortion, immigration, gun control and gay rights (although not gay marriage). It is their votes that he needs to secure the nomination.

“It would be one thing if Giuliani could say, ‘I’m a strong social conservative in my private life’, but he can’t even say that,” said Ramesh Ponnuru, a conservative commentator and author of The Party of Death, an attack on social liberalism. “It’s not just the fact of his multiple marriages, it is the way the Hanover marriage melted down. It was operatic.”

When Giuliani met Hanover on a blind date in the early 1980s, his first marriage to Regina, his second cousin, was already over. Hanover, who went on to appear in the television series Ally McBeal, was a glamorous soulmate who seemed to enjoy the spotlight as much as he did.

They had two children, Andrew, 21, and Caroline, 17, but in 1996 Hanover stopped calling herself by his last name and a year later Vanity Fair magazine said that he was having an “intimate relationship” with a senior member of his staff.

In 2000, without telling Hanover first, Giuliani announced at a press conference that he was separating from her. She retaliated by accusing him of being unfaithful with the employee, but he was already with Nathan.

Maggie Gallagher, a family values campaigner, was outraged by Giuliani’s “scummy” performance, accusing him of making Bill Clinton “look good as a husband and father”.

New Yorkers learnt during the divorce case that their cancer- afflicted mayor was temporarily impotent and Hanover demanded a huge settlement, including £760 a month to care for Goalie, the family’s golden retriever.

Felder struck back, accusing Hanover of being an “uncaring mother” who was “howling like a stuck pig”.

In the end Giuliani, who was beginning to earn big consultancy fees after September 11, agreed to a settlement of $6.8m to avoid the full horror of a court case.

Hanover has married Ed Oster, her university sweetheart, and written a book, My Boyfriend’s Back, about rekindling an old romance. Even if she stays mum, there is enough in the public domain to rattle conservatives. Yet however vicious the personal attacks on Giuliani, they are unlikely to dent his reputation for competence. He did, after all, handle the September 11 attacks while bunking with gay friends in the midst of an affair and a divorce battle.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008election; corrupt; donnahanover; exwife; giuliani; hitpiece; letch; nothanksrudy; rino; toomanywives
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460461-475 next last
To: wagglebee

I still don't understand why, as per this article, Donna irrationally insisted on the dog's support payment to be made in British pounds. :-)


421 posted on 01/07/2007 8:58:49 PM PST by supremedoctrine ("Talent hits a target no one else can hit, genius hits a target no one else can see"--Schopenhauer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arizona Carolyn; Reagan Man

I put illegal immigration squarely in the national security category.


422 posted on 01/07/2007 9:05:20 PM PST by ellery (The true danger is when liberty is nibbled away, for expedience, and by parts. - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: UWconservative

Because the rinos on this site know nothing else but RUUUUUUUUUUdy.


423 posted on 01/07/2007 9:08:15 PM PST by HANG THE EXPENSE (Defeat liberalism, its the right thing to do for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JHBowden
>>>>>If you think a feminized America under the leadership of Pelosi, Hillary!, and Dingy Harry will survive (with letters of help from the UN, of course), you have more faith in the Democrats than I do.

WTF! I don't have any faith in liberals of any party affiliation, Democratic or Republican. My point was pretty straightforward. Attempts to purge the GOP of social conservatives, or fiscal cosnervatives for that matter, will only lead to utter failure and another win for the bad guys in 2008. Breaking up the old Reagan coalition is sure death for the GOP.

Rudy Giuliani is not the answer to the GOP`s problem. Rudy has supported liberalism his entire life. Rudy is the antithesis of conservatism.

424 posted on 01/07/2007 9:09:35 PM PST by Reagan Man (In 2007, its Conservatism versus Liberalism..... the choice is yours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Rudy did two great things while he was Mayor: made sure Arafat knew he was not welcome and had him removed from some event in NYC, and told the Saudi Arabians to shove their multimillion dollar "aid" check after 9-11/ If he had a creative hard-line approach like that as President, I might almost be enticed to vote for him, regardless of the fact that he is otherwise not a "Conservative". If ANY candidate could be enticed to have as part of his platform, the absolute BAN on building new mosques in the United States, I would vote for him. A step like that is ESSENTIAL. Without it, we are permanently back to Square One, no matter what else we do. Unfortunately, the ONLY candidates who would even consider doing that, will be on the Republican side, and they would first have to be anointed by the RNC, and the RNC would never certify such a plank/ but it is the only one that matters.


425 posted on 01/07/2007 9:14:30 PM PST by supremedoctrine ("Talent hits a target no one else can hit, genius hits a target no one else can see"--Schopenhauer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

I do think Rudy would push for more gun control. And I think he would do so more successfully than Carter and the 'toon, precisely because he's a Republican. It's along the lines of "it took Nixon to go to China."


426 posted on 01/07/2007 9:21:42 PM PST by ellery (The true danger is when liberty is nibbled away, for expedience, and by parts. - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: ellery

Let me amend that last post -- I'm working to train myself not to use the term "gun control." It's a misnomer, and is the language of our opponents. I should have said: I think Rudy would push for more anti-Second-Amendment legislation.


427 posted on 01/07/2007 9:23:13 PM PST by ellery (The true danger is when liberty is nibbled away, for expedience, and by parts. - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
You're bound and determined to work at destroying the winning coalition of social and fiscal conservatives that Reagan built the GOP into during the second half of the 1970`s.

No, the last Republican congress, aided by POTUS, was bound and determined to destroy that coalition. If they had just controlled their ridiculous spending, I daresay libertarians and independents would have looked the other way on social issues.

428 posted on 01/07/2007 9:26:29 PM PST by ellery (The true danger is when liberty is nibbled away, for expedience, and by parts. - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies]

To: ellery
>>>>>No, the last Republican congress, aided by POTUS, was bound and determined to destroy that coalition.

Agreed. Bush&Company wanted to purge the GOP of fiscal conservatives. This current crop of libertarian minded Republicans, want to purge the GOP of social conservatives. Either way, the GOP can't survive. That was the unique political foundation of factors to the Reagan coalition. The modern Republican Party can't exist without both voting contingents.

429 posted on 01/07/2007 9:35:04 PM PST by Reagan Man (In 2007, its Conservatism versus Liberalism..... the choice is yours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 428 | View Replies]

To: Cincinna
Isn't it a sad state when we consider someone's marital history more important than their leadership and intellectual ability?

In this case, his marital history points to a character problem. And character means a lot to many voters.

430 posted on 01/07/2007 9:37:45 PM PST by technochick99 ( Firearm of choice: Sig Sauer....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

A scorned woman and a relative?

Drop off the radar for the good of the country. /Next


431 posted on 01/07/2007 9:38:54 PM PST by MaxMax (God Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaxMax

The 2008 Race will and All New York Affair. A Choice between a Liberal New Yorker ( Giuliani) and A VERY Liberal New Yorker.( Hillary Clinton.)


432 posted on 01/07/2007 9:50:11 PM PST by tomcorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 431 | View Replies]

To: tomcorn

Sad prediction.

I'll support only a conservative with national (media) gonads.


433 posted on 01/07/2007 10:18:06 PM PST by MaxMax (God Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 432 | View Replies]

To: snugs

In my own extended family I have seen this problem up close: not people directly related to ME, but my father's brother's wife was from a family where the other two sisters married two brothers who were cousins with them. The two sisters had 6 children among them, two of whom had various degrees of mental retardation. It just ain't wise: there is a higher degree probability of birth defects AUTOMATICALLY, though, of course it doesn't always happen/\
Marrying a cousin, on the face of it, always seemed to be to me just a very LAZY thing to do, kind of creepily convenient, like Woody Allen falling in love and marrying his and Miaa's adopted Asian child, technically his "daughter" , whatever her name is.


434 posted on 01/07/2007 10:36:38 PM PST by supremedoctrine ("Talent hits a target no one else can hit, genius hits a target no one else can see"--Schopenhauer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies]

To: tomcorn

You left out the all-important detail that adds so much to the picture you carefully crafted: dressing more than once in drag, notably on SNL.


435 posted on 01/07/2007 10:40:14 PM PST by supremedoctrine ("Talent hits a target no one else can hit, genius hits a target no one else can see"--Schopenhauer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 371 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

I think you're right. It's very difficult for social conservatives and libertarians to find common ground -- Reagan was so gifted that he managed to overcome the natural animosity between the two groups. Now, without a Reagan, I think our best bet for common ground overall is Constitutional adherence, fiscal conservatism, plus pushing social issues at a state and local level. That way social conservatives don't have to live with a porn emporium on one side and a crackhouse on the other, and libertarians can do what they like in the privacy of their own homes without having to worry about the JBTs breaking down their door.

And if they don't like the social mores of their current home, there's undoubtedly another city or state that will better suit them. That's what the founders had in mind, anyway -- a whole bunch of little laboratories of liberty (as defined by the local residents).

Of course, that won't happen, because everyone on this site is too busy pointing fingers at everyone else, and the rest of our less-interested-in-politics potential allies have fallen asleep in front of Dancing with the Stars.

:)


436 posted on 01/07/2007 11:14:46 PM PST by ellery (The true danger is when liberty is nibbled away, for expedience, and by parts. - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 429 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

I should have added two things to the list of things we should be able to agree on at a federal level: Constitutional adherence, fiscal conservatism, and the two things that Reagan embodied: national defense, and the wonderful promise of American freedom and enterprise. Add social issues at the state and local level, and I bet we could forge a new coalition.


437 posted on 01/07/2007 11:19:18 PM PST by ellery (The true danger is when liberty is nibbled away, for expedience, and by parts. - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 436 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
How about you let states worry about gay marriages...

STATES RATIFY Constitutional Amendments.


If you cut taxes and limit government, people will make the right choices themselves.

Illegal immigration...

438 posted on 01/08/2007 3:27:56 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
You honestly believe Rudy will repeal the 2nd Amendment or push for more gun control laws?

I know what Julie-Annie has said and done. I also know what he has not done. My Constituitonal rights do not end at the New York city limits, no matter who is mayor...

439 posted on 01/08/2007 3:31:26 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: ellery
I should have added two things to the list of things we should be able to agree on at a federal level: Constitutional adherence...

Add social issues at the state and local level,...

States ratify Amendments...

440 posted on 01/08/2007 3:36:02 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460461-475 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson