To: neverdem
I heard this story today. Wow -- it will surely derail the stem cell votes in Congress. At least, postpone them.
11 posted on
01/08/2007 11:29:12 PM PST by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: Salvation; hocndoc; Coleus; LadyDoc
I heard this story today. Wow -- it will surely derail the stem cell votes in Congress. At least, postpone them. I'm still somewhat awestruck by Dr. Atala's claim of no teratomas, and that banking 100,000 samples of amniotic fluid will provide identical tissue matches for 99 percent of our population needing transplants. Politically, I'd like to see Bush go on the offense.
12 posted on
01/09/2007 12:09:32 AM PST by
neverdem
(May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
To: Salvation
"Wow -- it will surely derail the stem cell votes in Congress. At least, postpone them." No, the congressional plan is not about protecting embryonic aged humans, it's about funding pets and the democrats now control the flow of legislation so it is ridiculous to believe democrats would slow their pets down from votes ... this will, however, make the President's case for vetoing stronger and that alone might make the democrats pause.
17 posted on
01/09/2007 9:07:58 AM PST by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support. Promote life support for others.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson