Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Fog Over Iraq (Or How Almost To Agree With The President)
New York Times ^ | 11 January 2007 | David Brooks

Posted on 01/11/2007 5:50:59 AM PST by shrinkermd

If the Democrats don’t like the U.S. policy on Iraq over the next six months, they have themselves partly to blame. There were millions of disaffected Republicans and independents ready to coalesce around some alternative way forward, but the Democrats never came up with anything remotely serious.

The liberals who favor quick exit never grappled with the consequences of that policy, which the Baker-Hamilton commission terrifyingly described. The centrists who believe in gradual withdrawal never explained why that wouldn’t be like pulling a tooth slowly. Joe Biden, who has the most intellectually serious framework for dealing with Iraq, was busy yesterday, at the crucial decision-making moment, conducting preliminary fact-finding hearings, complete with forays into Iraqi history

But the selling of the plan illustrates that this is not the whole story. The Iraqi government wants a unified non-sectarian solution in high-minded statements and in some distant, ideal world. But in the short term, and in the deepest reptilian folds of their brains, the Shiites are maneuvering amid the sectarian bloodbath all around.

(Excerpt) Read more at select.nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: brooks; iraq; potus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Brooks does his best to support the NYT's view the war is lost and that the Iraqis did not want more troops, etc. The real NYT editorial on this, as usual, is on the front page with a summary on the Editorial page.

Brooks claims to be a "conservative." He is not. But he is capable of reason and in spite of the NYT position of lost war and no new troops needed he realizes theat no other real, viable position has been offered.

Murtha, DU and the Daily Kos believe otherwise.

1 posted on 01/11/2007 5:51:03 AM PST by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

I've enjoyed Brooks' comments on occasion..but to use the words "Biden" and "Intellectually serious" in the same sentence boggles the mind. I think I'm coming closer to your viewpoint on Brooks.


2 posted on 01/11/2007 5:55:00 AM PST by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Any assessment of the situation in Iraq that is predicated on the notion that Iraq is capable of being a viable, unified nation is suspect at best. And any U.S. approach to Iraq that hinges on this utopian -- and increasingly delusional -- idea is likely to fail.


3 posted on 01/11/2007 5:56:49 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

You got that straight! However, Biden does know a good speech when he steals one.


4 posted on 01/11/2007 6:03:49 AM PST by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
It is time for Bush to go it alone. He should forget the politicians of both parties and just do what he knows is the right thing. Let the congress cut off the money if they want. There are other ways to pay the bills.
5 posted on 01/11/2007 6:07:50 AM PST by Phlap (REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

It is time for Bush to go it alone. He should forget the politicians of both parties and just do what he knows is the right thing. Let the congress cut off the money if they want. There are other ways to pay the bills.

Like how? From his own pocket?

6 posted on 01/11/2007 6:12:17 AM PST by micho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Phlap

It is time for Bush to go it alone!


I could not agree more. Time to go in and get the job done. Shut the freaking libs up and let them cry all they want. They are the ones turning this into a POLITICAL GAME.

Presidnet Bush, I for one amd with you! Let's Roll and Get the job done. God be with our troops!


7 posted on 01/11/2007 6:15:21 AM PST by JFC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Iran has to go down, along with Syria.


8 posted on 01/11/2007 6:15:26 AM PST by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys--Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: micho

Borrow from France.


9 posted on 01/11/2007 6:16:47 AM PST by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

There is nothing wrong with an Iraq that practices Islam while using constitutional law as its guideline.

If my memory serves me correctly, we were built on the same principles with Christianity as our guideline. So much so that "In god we trust" is embedded into our lives.

Iraq can live along those guidelines. You just have to take out the radical element first. That will be the next phase of this operation because without that, Iraq will never go right.

As a side note, what is hysterical about this is that the RATS, who have been trying to remove religion from our nation, doesn't support it in Iraq. They like the radicals.

Imagine if radical Christians started blowing things up to turn this country into a Christian Iraq.


10 posted on 01/11/2007 6:20:14 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz ("Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted." Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
There is nothing wrong with an Iraq that practices Islam while using constitutional law as its guideline.

Iraq doesn't just "practice Islam" -- it has enshrined Islam as the official state religion in its constitution.

If my memory serves me correctly, we were built on the same principles with Christianity as our guideline.

Christianity was "our guideline" only in a very generic sense. If you read the formal documents on which this country was founded, you'll find few -- if any -- religious aspects of Christianity in them. My sense is that the only uniquely Christian aspect of this country has been what I call "civil Christianity" (as opposed to "religious Christianity"). Civil Christianity is that aspect of Christianity that deals with the basic -- and historically unique -- notion that Christians are expected to treat all people (Christian and non-Christian) alike.

The founders of this country went to great lengths to eradicate any notion of an official government religion -- specifically to avoid the kind of nonsense that has become commonplace in Iraq today.

11 posted on 01/11/2007 6:31:51 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

The basic tenets of Islam is NOT democracy. Have you ever read the Koran? I didn't think so.


12 posted on 01/11/2007 6:34:40 AM PST by micho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
"And any U.S. approach to Iraq that hinges on this utopian -- and increasingly delusional -- idea is likely to fail."

Why can moderates not succeed against extremists in the ME? The fight is on everywhere. The Iranian people are fed up with their totalitarian regime. The struggle is manifesting itself in Lebanon, in Somalia, in Afghanistan, in Thailand and elsewhere.

There is no other choice for the civilized world but to support these moderates with rapid globalization occurring.

They must succeed and we need to do our part.

13 posted on 01/11/2007 6:38:05 AM PST by Earthdweller (All reality is based on faith in something.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Earthdweller

If radical Muslims are such a small component of the Islamic world, then "our part" should include nothing more than dropping 25 million AK-47s and a billion rounds of ammunition on a country like Iraq, and letting these people establish their own democratic country.


14 posted on 01/11/2007 6:45:24 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
"Joe Biden... intellectually serious"

And there you have it folks. The birth of a new oxymoron.

15 posted on 01/11/2007 6:53:39 AM PST by upchuck (The American coup de grĂ¢ce is well on its way. Thus far, the Donks haven't had to fire a shot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
"The founders of this country went to great lengths to eradicate any notion of an official government religion -- specifically to avoid the kind of nonsense that has become commonplace in Iraq today."

President Bush did say..things won't be perfect.

The alternative is to wait for the "perfect" solution, stay isolated and neutral allowing the rising extremists to squash the rapid tide of moderate reformation.

In this scenario, the world population of Muslims continues to increase rapidly under extremist (Islamofascist) influence and the result would be a world war in the very near future unlike any other we have ever seen.

Is that really what you want?

16 posted on 01/11/2007 7:00:21 AM PST by Earthdweller (All reality is based on faith in something.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
...letting these people establish their own democratic country."

See post #16.

17 posted on 01/11/2007 7:01:26 AM PST by Earthdweller (All reality is based on faith in something.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Iraq doesn't just "practice Islam" -- it has enshrined Islam as the official state religion in its constitution.

Some of the countries that have an official state religion: UK, Argentina, Costa Rica, Finland, Greece, Romania, Denmark, Iceland, Norway, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Malaysia, Thailand, and Israel [de facto]. The Iraqi constitution also protects the practice of religion.

The founders of this country went to great lengths to eradicate any notion of an official government religion -- specifically to avoid the kind of nonsense that has become commonplace in Iraq today.

Right, they did not want anything similar to the Church of England.

18 posted on 01/11/2007 7:02:49 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

The battle in Iraq is about stopping a relatively few terrorists and insurgents from taking down the democratically elected unity government of Iraq, which was put in power by 12 million Iraqis going to the polls risking life and limb to vote.


19 posted on 01/11/2007 7:06:07 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: micho

Float a bond.


20 posted on 01/11/2007 7:18:48 AM PST by Phlap (REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson