[kinoxi]

New rules require screening of all facts and interpretations by agency scientists who study everything from caribou mating to global warming.

You don't think results should be reviewed? This doesn't affect seismological information as you implied. It creates a reviewal process in the government which IMHO is sorely needed and should be explored.

[Szent_Adam_Kiraly]

"You don't think results should be reviewed? This doesn't affect seismological information as you implied. It creates a reviewal process in the government which IMHO is sorely needed and should be explored."


Why does the govt need to review the results pre-publication? Publication doesnt nullify scientific findings from criticism.

This could very well effect seismological data.
"— prior to any submission for publication — “of findings or data that may be especially newsworthy, have an impact on government policy, or contradict previous public understanding to ensure that proper officials are notified and that communication strategies are developed.”"

The govt can already review and criticize scientific findings post publication. Political pressure on science, makes objectivity and investigational integrity more difficult.