Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Silencing conservatives on the airwaves
WND ^ | 01-12-2007 | Melanie Morgan

Posted on 01/12/2007 5:32:02 PM PST by BlueJ7

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: HawaiianGecko
You of course have a valid point.

I genuinely fear this, however.

I've enjoyed news/drama/comedy radio since the 1940s. I am ecstatic with modern talk radio. I lived through the decades of the "Fairness Doctrine."

When President Reagan ended the "Fairness Doctrine" and modern talk radio began the most oft-heard caller comments were, "I didn't know others knew about that!" "I thought I was the only one who believed that way!"

There won't be a new "Fairness Doctrine." There are too many sources of information. The courts were about to end it if Reagan had not.

There is however the "threat" to democracy as outlined in the very popular on the left (NY Times, for example) book, "Republic.com."

Literally, the government should force Internet users, for example, to consider all opinions. "No more conservative web sites only, Mister! Our democracy is in peril from such 'narrow' conservative thinking, see." The author may have backed off a little on forcing compliance.

Mr. Stark (please see my reply above) used a word to describe yet another "threat" to our democracy. It conveyed the idea of threatening social order, a word less shrill than hatemonger. I can't remember it.

I say again: This cannot be ignored. Congress must know that we will not stand for it.

Already there's a proposal in Congress that would require conservative talk show hosts to register as "lobbyists." Recently a Seattle radio station was deemed by a court to have contributed money to an election campaign solely because one of the hosts opposed a ballot measure on air.

This cannot be ignored.

21 posted on 01/12/2007 8:05:21 PM PST by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Tailback

Bravo!! Great future vision!


22 posted on 01/12/2007 8:14:14 PM PST by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Bittersweetmd
Historically violence in freedom's pursuit has been the only route to securing and preserving liberty from ones oppressors.

In current times and for practical purposes violence has been removed from our arsenal and I'm not sure what course to take.

I know underestimating ones enemies (as I imply Melanie Morgan has) is a mistake. I also believe engaging in debate with liars (the US left in our case) is like bringing a handshake to a gun fight.

What we can do now on an individual basis is make sure we don't empower our enemies with a feeling of acceptance. We can refuse to hire a lib tradesman or purchase from a leftist business and be sure to tell them why. We can note who was arrested for throwing rocks through the windows of a Republican's campaign headquarters, get their phone number and call them (as well as their neighbors and employer) to express disgust. We can divest ourselves of liberal friends, again being sure to tell them why. Same with family.. societal ruin is thicker than blood.

Your overly broad response to my post indicates to me your question is more rhetorical in intent. Perhaps designed to dismiss my carping with little substance of your own. Usually I ignore such but there was an answer for you.

Not complete or perfect? You bet. But I thought Melanie Morgan's comment needed to be corrected because its casual acceptance takes us further from the prize.


23 posted on 01/12/2007 8:25:24 PM PST by I see my hands (_8(|)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

If we lose talk radio, we lose the war. That simple.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

There is a good reason why rebels storm the broadcast towers and stations. Those who control the media, win.



24 posted on 01/13/2007 7:15:49 PM PST by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

Worked for Hitler to start his war with Poland didn't it. Had a squad dressed like Poles come across, attack the radio station, make a broadcast, then run back across to Poland (or so they put out). The control the MSM, TV, etc. Talk radio is it for us. That is all we have beside the internet. And a lot of people do not get news from the internet. They get their sports, buy stuff, and porn (LOL)!!!


25 posted on 01/13/2007 7:17:55 PM PST by RetiredArmy (Dimocrats stand for everything I hate, despise and wish to see destroyed, including dimocrats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: I see my hands
We can divest ourselves of liberal friends

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

After the election of 2000, I was disgusted and appalled at the lengths the Democrats would take to steal an election. I was revolted by my liberal acquaintances and their excuses for this behavior.

It was then that I realized that I could never again be friends with a so-called "liberal". I saw them for what they are: Leftist/Marxist/Collectivist Socialists.
26 posted on 01/13/2007 7:23:31 PM PST by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: BlueJ7
Bump for the morning show.

The 3 hours long special show from yesterday on this topic can be heard on the KSFO website.

I listened to hour 1 today.

27 posted on 01/13/2007 7:52:27 PM PST by budman_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueJ7
It merely prohibits a station from blasting away day after day from one perspective, without any opposing views.

So "Air America" would have been illegal under the Fairness Doctrine, even if it did not die all by itself just due to market forces.

28 posted on 01/13/2007 7:55:51 PM PST by Alouette (Psalms of the Day: 108-112)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

"Liberals just want attention, that's all."

Bull. Libs want control. CONTROL! Total Control. Over every facit of YOUR life. They want socialism. Worse, they would happily kill every person who uttered a conservative idea. They are rabid and unending in their efforts. They are Islamists without the rags.


29 posted on 01/13/2007 8:17:07 PM PST by lawdude (2006: The election"s we will live to die for!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson