Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sandy Berger: What Did He Take and Why Did He Take It?(Sandy Burglar)
Real Clear Politics ^ | January 15, 2007 | Ronald A. Cass

Posted on 01/15/2007 7:33:10 AM PST by kellynla

Some things cry out for explanation. Like finding $90,000 in marked bills in a Congressman's freezer. Or finding out that a blue-chip lawyer who held one of the most important jobs in the nation was willing to risk his career, his livelihood, and his liberty to steal, hide, and destroy classified documents.

We all have a pretty good idea what the money was doing in Representative William Jefferson's freezer. But the questions about President William Jefferson Clinton's National Security Adviser, Sandy Berger, just keep piling up.

It's time we got some answers.

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: berger; sandyberger; sandybergler; sandyburglar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last
To: kellynla

bump...


21 posted on 01/15/2007 8:04:56 AM PST by God luvs America (When the silent majority speaks the earth trembles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stallone

DIE RINOS!


22 posted on 01/15/2007 8:05:41 AM PST by Stallone (War and Politics: When the Enemy begins to feel pain, they change their behavior to avoid it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

The apathy of the electorate on this is stunning, imo. Even here. This post won't reach 90 posts.


23 posted on 01/15/2007 8:07:12 AM PST by subterfuge (Today, Tolerance =greatest virtue;Hypocrisy=worst character defect; Discrimination =worst atrocity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
HEADLINE: Sandy Berger: What Did He Take and Why Did He Take It?(Sandy Burglar)

Heck. I can answer that and it won't cost millions of dollars and thousands of hours of FBI gumshoe time and head-scratching only to shrug my confused shoulders...

What? - Top Secret records

Why? - To destroy them and cover up for his own and Bubba's criminal negligence/purposes in ignoring deadly threats to America so they wouldn't get exposed by the 9/11 Commission

There. That was quick and easy, wasn't it? I won't even bill the government for my valuable time!

24 posted on 01/15/2007 8:09:54 AM PST by Gritty (The West has three potentially fatal bugs -- pacifism, self-hatred, and complacency - Richard Pipes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

The stolen documents are worth a ton of money which is the primary reason for the theft. How many copies did burglar make and how many did he sell. I suspect millions were involved.


25 posted on 01/15/2007 8:10:05 AM PST by Neoliberalnot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iopscusa
Hopefully this is another opportunity for the Blogs to trump the lazy, mendacious LeftWing Media....looks like a swarm is slowly building against the continuous travesty of justice that is the residue from the Clintons and their media tools!

I wonder if Buckhead has skills beyond typefaces and proportional spacing...

26 posted on 01/15/2007 8:11:18 AM PST by T-Bird45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

BTTT


27 posted on 01/15/2007 8:11:46 AM PST by girlangler (Fish Fear Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stallone
If the American people ever found out Clinton knew 9/11 was going to happen and was willing to let it happen for the glory of martial law and personal political power, any faith the American people had in it's government would be lost.

The cover up is to keep peoples faith in our government. I believe Washington feels it's better we don't know how far Clinton, the President of the United States, was willing to go for that kind of power. Clinton does not represent presidents of the past nor of the present. He was a criminal, dictatorial fluke that managed to deceive a nation.

Remember, the left always accuses the right of doing what it itself is doing. They scream "Bush knew." That is an indication I'm right. They knew.
A left wing attack is a mirror of the left itself. It always is and always has been.

28 posted on 01/15/2007 8:12:19 AM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics

I have no doubt that what you say is closer to the truth.

But I differ entirely on your conclusion.

Exposing the Clinton administration and the anti-American Democrats sycophants would and could prevent them from ever holding power.

The consequences directly affect me, my family, my friends and for that someone will pay.


29 posted on 01/15/2007 8:19:28 AM PST by Stallone (War and Politics: When the Enemy begins to feel pain, they change their behavior to avoid it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC; brownsfan; Obadiah

Marcus Tullius Cicero - Roman Statesman
Speech in the Roman Senate - 42 BC

A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist.


30 posted on 01/15/2007 8:21:17 AM PST by Liz (Nearly all men can stand adversity, but to test a man's character, give him power. Abe Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Gritty
Clinton wanted it to happen on his watch. It didn't. That's why the left was willing to go to any means necessary to insure Gore won in 2000. They didn't even hide their attempts to steal that election. They knew what was coming. Gore HAD to win. Martial law and a life time of left wing rule depended on it.

To this day, 7 years later, they still despise George Bush for taking away their ultimate power and glory. He destroyed the plan of a life time. They'll never forgive him for it.

31 posted on 01/15/2007 8:21:26 AM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge
The apathy of the electorate on this is stunning, imo. Even here. This post won't reach 90 posts.

I hope you're wrong about this. fh

32 posted on 01/15/2007 8:21:41 AM PST by faux_hog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: All
Why are we letting this duplicitous dumbo get away with endangering US citizens? Lamebrain Berger running our national security had precious few "successes" and flops galore:

(1) Berger was on-duty when top-secret US technology was sold to China.

(2) Berger was on-duty when the US bombed the aspirin factory; lamebrain Berger advised Clinton it was manufacturing deadly chemicals.

(3) Berger was on-duty during Somolia, and Kosovo, and Hatti, and all the other wonderful military success stories of the Clinton administration.

(4) And then there's the infamous Clinton pardons Berger aided and abetted, and did nothing to stop. Mark Rich was and is the biggest tax cheat in US history, who absconded, then renounced his US citizenship to evade prosecution.

(5) Clinton also pardoned 16 terrorists---members of the FALN---- so Hillary could get Latino votes for her Senate run in NY's large Puerto Rican population. The Armed Forces of National Liberation (FALN) was involved in more than 100 bombings in the United States during the 1970s and 1980s." Berger did nothing to stop it.

(6) And let's not forget the bombing of the Chinese embassy.

(7) Remember when then-Pres Clinton went to Norfolk making a "solemn promise" to the families, friends and shipmates of the USS Cole to avenge their deaths. But when the opportunity presented itself, he squandered it. Clinton flunky, Berger, conveniently blamed the misstep on the Pentagon.

As if anyone in the Pentagon would pass up the chance to avenge the sailors of the USS Cole.

33 posted on 01/15/2007 8:24:23 AM PST by Liz (Nearly all men can stand adversity, but to test a man's character, give him power. Abe Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan
Well stated.
34 posted on 01/15/2007 8:24:46 AM PST by Churchillspirit (We are all foot soldiers in this War On Terror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #35 Removed by Moderator

To: Gritty

Berger stole classified security documents because he knows revelations about his activities as Clinton's National Security Adviser would expose him as a complete incompetent..........or worse.

Berger is apparently covering-up and shredding crucial info that reflects upon US national security failures, and possibly unauthorized transfers of classified info to foreign countries.

It's chilling for patriots to read that Berger was a "workaholic" as Clinton's National Security Adviser----Berger was always seen surrounded with top-secret documents---and he often worked late, when no one was around to see what he was doing.

A study of his Clinton-era phone records and computer emails to see who Berger was talking to should prove interesting. God knows how much info Berger stole then, where he hid it, and where it ended up.


36 posted on 01/15/2007 8:27:29 AM PST by Liz (Nearly all men can stand adversity, but to test a man's character, give him power. Abe Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: river rat
Seems the Clintonistas already have a "star chamber".

Except their star is tarnished.

37 posted on 01/15/2007 8:28:00 AM PST by Churchillspirit (We are all foot soldiers in this War On Terror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge; All

"The apathy of the electorate on this is stunning, imo. Even here. This post won't reach 90 posts."


Well the WSJ editorial I posted Saturday on Berger hit 133 Posts & over 1,980 hits.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1767043/posts

But the fact that the Left controls & has the backing of the MSM, not to forget my belief that the Clintons have copies of F.B.I. files, does make me believe that Berger won't see one day behind bars.

At this point, all we can do is make sure that another Clinton NEVER darkens the doorway of the Oval Office.


38 posted on 01/15/2007 8:28:02 AM PST by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

He obviously took something that was very damning to the Clinton presidency. Probably proof of Bill's failure to act when offered Bin Laden by Saudi Arabia.


39 posted on 01/15/2007 8:28:41 AM PST by TruthWillWin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Thanks for posting the refreshers!


40 posted on 01/15/2007 8:33:21 AM PST by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson