Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'SCOOTER' Libby TRIAL Could Be A High-Profile BLOODLETTING
ABC NEWS ^ | ABC NEWS

Posted on 01/16/2007 6:38:48 AM PST by rface

Former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage originally leaked Plame's identity. Armitage says the leak was inadvertent, and he is not being prosecuted.......Federal prosecutors are trying to show that Libby lied to investigators about conversations he had with reporters regarding Plame. Libby has denied lying and says he has a faulty memory........

Former Cheney Chief of Staff on Trial for Allegedly Lying to a Grand Jury, Not Outing CIA Agent:

.Jan. 16, 2007 — Jury selection begins today in the trial of I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, the former chief of staff to Vice President Dick Cheney.

Libby is charged with perjury and obstruction of justice in the leaking of the identity of a former CIA operative.

Libby is on trial for allegedly lying to a grand jury about the source of a leak that outed former CIA operative Valerie Plame. Plame's identity was leaked to the media after her husband, former U.S. Ambassador Joseph Wilson, was critical of the Bush administration's handling of the war in Iraq.

Libby has been called a master of discretion, and the trial promises to be a high-profile bloodletting.

[ snip ]

Among those on the star-studded witness list are former White House press secretary Ari Fleisher and NBC "Meet the Press" host Tim Russert.

[ snip ]

Said Lanny Davis, former special counsel to President Clinton, "I can imagine [White House press secretary] Tony Snow behind closed doors saying, 'Oh my God, of all the things we have to face is a trial when we are facing all of this stuff in Iraq. This couldn't have happened at a worse time,'"

[ snip ]

Libby's trial is an unwelcome distraction for the administration at a critical juncture.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abcfantasy; armitage; cialeak; davis; lannydavis; libby; nigerflap; nonevent; plameleak; richardarmitage; showtrial
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last
To: rface

This is the "Seinfeld" of Scandals, a Scandal about...nothing.


21 posted on 01/16/2007 7:04:00 AM PST by dfwgator (The University of Florida - Championship U)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

A bloodletting, eh? Like Julius Caesar's assassination. And the MSM with the knives under their togas.


22 posted on 01/16/2007 7:05:57 AM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface
All Libby has to do is show Armitage spoke to any reporter who in turn spoke to Russert and he walks because it's a he said, he said. Contents is not important because Armitage already said he spoke Plames name. Libby holds the trump card against Plame and Wilson because they can't ask any national security questions or reasons for Iraq but Libby's lawyers can ask them who all they spoke to about their claim. It will be a Merry Fitzmas and with any luck Wilson will continue to lie and get charged with perjury when he lies to the jury.
23 posted on 01/16/2007 7:06:01 AM PST by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

Nah Duke will never get to trial. (But in my fantasy world the defense attorneys would have not allowed Nifong to drop the rape charges just so they would be able to get the lying whore on the witness stand for the legal version of "machine gun practice, 50c/hr".)


24 posted on 01/16/2007 7:06:20 AM PST by jiggyboy (Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: rface
Typical wishful thinking by ABC.

They just HAD to include a comment from Lanny-the-Moron-Davis where he imagines what Tony Snow says. Absurd.

25 posted on 01/16/2007 7:07:21 AM PST by subterfuge (Today, Tolerance =greatest virtue;Hypocrisy=worst character defect; Discrimination =worst atrocity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

Lanny Davis imagining thoughts in Tony Snow's head... why isn't this in breaking news?


26 posted on 01/16/2007 7:09:17 AM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SengirV

Can you imagine if all the Clinton toadies were put on trial for lying? The court docket would be clogged for years.


27 posted on 01/16/2007 7:09:18 AM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rface

Shhh, don't look too closely and just go with the flow.


28 posted on 01/16/2007 7:10:30 AM PST by SengirV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SengirV
Where is Sandy Berger's trial? Where is the media attention for Sandy Berger's CRIMES?
29 posted on 01/16/2007 7:11:13 AM PST by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
[Meanwhile Fitzgerald lied to the public and congress by continuing the investigation long after the facts were known so he could trump up some phoney charges and continue to bill the government millions of dollars.]

Yep. Fitzgerald is just like Nifong...drunk with power and stupidity. These DA's aren't really pursuing justice. What a sham.
30 posted on 01/16/2007 7:16:48 AM PST by khnyny (For today in the city of David a Savior has been born for you who is Messiah and Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The South Texan

The entire federal budget is not enough to satisy the MSM if it means going after Republicans. I will be shocked if any of them even hint at the cost.


31 posted on 01/16/2007 7:19:24 AM PST by Enterprise (Drop pork bombs on the Islamofascist wankers. Praise the Lord and pass the hammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
with any luck Wilson will continue to lie and get charged with perjury when he lies to the jury.

I hope any "bloodletting" is from Wilson's vital arteries. He and his wife can be ruined financially if he lies again. If he doesn't, he has to admit to all his previous lies. Either way, it'll be great watching the destruction of the fun couple from Santa Fe.
32 posted on 01/16/2007 7:23:54 AM PST by Thrownatbirth (.....when the sidewalks are safe for the little guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: rface

Fitzmas? Don't you mean Festivus? It's Festivus for the rest of us!!!


33 posted on 01/16/2007 7:25:44 AM PST by Paco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maryz; All
My sense is that Wilson is going to end up being a very important witness in this case -- if not in the trial itself, then in a subsequent appeal.

One of the basic requirements for a perjury conviction is that it must relate to a trial or hearing on a substantive matter, and the perjured statements must be relevant to the case in question. Libby's basic defense is two-fold:

1. The matter is not substantive, since the questions Libby was asked involved a matter so inconsequential that he could easily have forgotten details over time; and

2. The matter is neither substantive nor relevant, since the prosecutor had no business conducting the investigation in the first place (because he wouldn't have been able to file criminal charges even if every accusation against various people in the "leak" case were true).

The testimony of Wilson is important because it ties directly to Point #2. Libby's defense team will probably go to great lengths to point out that the original CIA request for an independent prosecutor was complete bullsh!t -- on the grounds that the CIA couldn't even make a minimal case that any information revealed about Valerie Plame involved a specific violation of a specific Federal statute. This would mean that Fitzgerald's actions in this case are the equivalent of a prosecutor pursuing a murder case even after the alleged "victim" of the murder shows up in court alive and well.

34 posted on 01/16/2007 7:38:38 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

5th Amendment may let em skate. Depends on the judge.


35 posted on 01/16/2007 7:39:29 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Leatherneck_MT; Red Badger
"I thought that you could not refuse to testify if subpoenaed" It's actually still a matter of choice. You can go, be sworn in and claim the 5th, or just sit there and say nothing.

It absolutely IS NOT a 'matter of choice.' You MAY NOT just sit by and say nothing -unless- it is incriminating to YOURSELF.

If you witness a crime, and you know that the defendent DID NOT commit the crime, then you can be compelled to testify as a witness for the defendant. You MAY NOT just choose to shut up, or else you will go to jail for contempt of court.

36 posted on 01/16/2007 7:40:31 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

Try to make me talk and I'll just sit there and stare at you.

It is a Choice, whether you care to believe so or not.

As I said, there are Consequences in doing so. I guess you missed that part.


37 posted on 01/16/2007 7:46:43 AM PST by Leatherneck_MT (In a world where Carpenters come back from the dead, ALL things are possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: montag813
..."Can't Gonzales take a break from his Internet porn obsession to focus on this madness?"


I've been wondering what this guy has been doing. Seems to be taking "low profile" to greater depths.
38 posted on 01/16/2007 7:48:37 AM PST by mcshot ("If it ain't broke it doesn't have enough features." paraphrased anon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Leatherneck_MT; Red Badger
I guess you missed that part.

No. I didn't miss that part.

If your semantics of "choice" means that murdering someone during a robbery with a handgun is "a choice," the same as owning one and killing a burglar/rapist during an assault is "a choice."

Surefine. It's just 'consequences,' whatever.

One is proscribed by law, and one is permitted by law.

If you accept the Fifth Amendment, then you have to accept the Sixth, as well.


39 posted on 01/16/2007 8:03:14 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: rface
'SCOOTER' Libby TRIAL Could Be A High-Profile BLOODLETTING

It better be.

40 posted on 01/16/2007 8:06:30 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson