Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats' New 'Fairness' Push May Silence Conservative Radio Hosts, Critics Say
CNSNews ^ | January 17, 2007 | Fred Lucas

Posted on 01/17/2007 4:16:02 AM PST by IrishMike

Democrats in Congress are pushing for legislation that they say would bring more balance to the media, but critics say would muzzle conservative voices.

The Fairness Doctrine, a federal regulation requiring broadcasters to present both sides of a controversial issue, was enforced by the Federal Communications Commission from 1949 to 1987, when it was dropped during the Reagan administration.

Many in the broadcast industry credit the dropping of the rule to the rise of conservative talk radio that became a booming industry, featuring personalities like Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Laura Ingraham.

Bringing back the regulation will ensure more even-handed coverage of political issues, said Jeff Lieberson, spokesman for Rep. Maurice Hinchey (D-N.Y.), who has proposed the "Media Ownership Reform Act."

"The political interests of media owners can have a direct and indirect effect on the way news is presented to the public, so it's important that all sides are heard," Lieberson told Cybercast News Service Tuesday.

The Fairness Doctrine is a key component of Hinchey's bill, which also sets tighter limits on media ownership. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) has proposed a companion bill in the Senate.

"This is not an attempt to muzzle them at all," Lieberson said of conservative talk show hosts who are opposed to the Fairness Doctrine. "They will still be heard. This will ensure that different views that are not theirs will also be heard."

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: congress; democrats; electionpresident; elections; fairnessdoctrine; fascism; geopolitics; govwatch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last
Here they come.
1 posted on 01/17/2007 4:16:05 AM PST by IrishMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

Dems grab at control over the media. No surprise there. I just wonder how many 'Pubbies will help them.


2 posted on 01/17/2007 4:20:48 AM PST by LIConFem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

Hopefully this doesn't pan out, but if it does, my prediction is broadcasters will put the liberal shows on in the middle of the night. They aren't going to "sacrifice" their profitable time slots to shows with no audiences and no sponsors (look how successful AirAmerica was, end/sarcasm)


3 posted on 01/17/2007 4:20:54 AM PST by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

All liberals have to do is call-in to the talk shows like they do on NPR...


4 posted on 01/17/2007 4:20:56 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

The mind boggles..


5 posted on 01/17/2007 4:21:11 AM PST by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

O.K., We'll take NBC and ABC.... You guys can keep cBS and PBS.


6 posted on 01/17/2007 4:22:26 AM PST by cobaltblu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LIConFem
I just wonder how many 'Pubbies will help them.

McCain?

The tactic here would be to pint out liberals can call-in, like they do to public radio... and would Democrats apply this to NPR as well???

7 posted on 01/17/2007 4:23:14 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

Wow, listen to the ACLU protest over this massive strike against free speech. Of course Bush will veto this nonsense just like he did the CFR bill.


8 posted on 01/17/2007 4:23:21 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike
The success of conservative talk radio is strong evidence that such a voice was missing from the marketplace, ergo old media had little or no conservative content. If there is to be true balance and fairness, it is old media that needs a dose of fairness. What will balance out NPR? Will ABCCBSNBC be forced to fire half their liberal staff and hire conservatives to balance out the newsrooms?
9 posted on 01/17/2007 4:24:40 AM PST by NonValueAdded (Pelosi, the call was for Comity, not Comedy. But thanks for the laughs. StarKisses, NVA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

Nah, NPR will get a loophole just like the one Native Americans got in McCain-Feingold.


10 posted on 01/17/2007 4:24:59 AM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

What's next? A law requiring me to spend as much time at the DUmp as I do at FR?


11 posted on 01/17/2007 4:25:25 AM PST by Fresh Wind (All we are sa-a-a-ying, is give Beast a chance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

The Cage Match of Death. I'm psyched.


12 posted on 01/17/2007 4:26:35 AM PST by Thrownatbirth (.....when the sidewalks are safe for the little guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

Sheesh. I guess 99 and 44/100ths domination just isn't enough - a few curmudgeonly types take advantage of a moribund, obsolete spectrum - AM radio - and so-called "liberals" bubble into apoplexy. What a bunch of clowns.


13 posted on 01/17/2007 4:26:47 AM PST by Freedom4US (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

Of course this cannot become law without the president's signature.........


and he would certainly not approve of this, right?


14 posted on 01/17/2007 4:29:04 AM PST by WhiteGuy (GOP Congress - 16,000 earmarks costing US $50 billion in 2006 - PAUL2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

Considering the up coming election in 08, I wonder if any Republican contender has a plan to counteract the MSM spin? In the last election the MSM was basically a 24/7 commercial for the dems. That needs to be addressed if Republicans stand any chance of winning.


15 posted on 01/17/2007 4:29:38 AM PST by Blind Eye Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood
"...and would Democrats apply this to NPR as well???"

Ha!!
16 posted on 01/17/2007 4:29:46 AM PST by LIConFem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

The Libs can't succeed on their own merits so the legislate to stifle those who would speak against them.


17 posted on 01/17/2007 4:29:48 AM PST by BuffaloJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike
Here they come.

The Commie Thought Control Police silencing opposition.

18 posted on 01/17/2007 4:30:02 AM PST by pke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

Looks like the new Democrat bipartisanship is Totalitarianism.


19 posted on 01/17/2007 4:30:33 AM PST by westmichman (The will of God always trumps the will of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

And remember, you're not even required to own a radio. Free choice, that's what these crumbs are trying to kill.


20 posted on 01/17/2007 4:31:05 AM PST by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson