Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate resolution to criticize Iraq plan [Hagel]
AP via Yahoo News ^ | 01/17/07 | ANNE FLAHERTY

Posted on 01/17/2007 11:12:58 AM PST by Enchante

WASHINGTON - Senate Democrats working with a well-known Republican war critic are developing a resolution declaring that President Bush's troop build up in Iraq "is not in the national interest," said people familiar with the document.

The resolution also would put the Senate on record as saying the U.S. commitment in Iraq "can only be sustained" with popular support among the American public and in Congress, according to officials who are knowledgeable about the draft.

These officials would speak only on grounds of anonymity because the drafting is still under way. Sen. Chuck Hagel (news, bio, voting record), a Nebraska Republican and potential 2008 presidential candidate, is helping Democrats with the wording of the anti-war resolution.

"It is not in the national interest of the United States to deepen its military involvement in Iraq, particularly by escalating U.S. troop presence in Iraq," it says.

The resolution will be cosponsored by Sens. Carl Levin (news, bio, voting record) and Joseph Biden (news, bio, voting record), as well as Hagel. Levin, D-Mich., chairs the Armed Services Committee, and Biden, D-Del., heads the Foreign Relations Committee.

The Senate leadership is expected by Thursday to propose the resolution, with debate planned around the same time that Bush delivers his State of the Union speech next Tuesday.

Hagel's agreement to help Democrats champion the resolution amounts to a setback to the administration and to Bush, who has argued vehemently that some 21,500 additional U.S. troops are needed to help the Iraqi government calm sectarian violence in Baghdad and Anbar province.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: benedicthagel; bush; chafee; chuckhagel; congress; democrats; hagel; hagelisatraitor; iraq; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
To: Enchante
Hagel's agreement to help Democrats champion the resolution amounts to a setback to the administration and to Bush

I'd say it cements his defeat in the Republican primaries. Why vote for him, when you can vote for a real Democrat?

21 posted on 01/17/2007 11:36:46 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright

At least you are a consistent liberal. With a name like "willard" I smell a RAT.


22 posted on 01/17/2007 11:37:39 AM PST by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nctexan

Again, Ron Paul is my man. He predicted the mess in Iraq when some folks here were predicting that we were on the verge of a democratic chain reaction in the Middle East, that the Iraq war would "pay for itself," that the insurgency was just a few foreigners taking pot-shots who would soon be quelled, that the MSM would soon have egg on their face on WMD, that the Iraqis were liberty loving (they voted for Shi'ite fundamentalists instead). Remember the famous quagmire alerts? Haven't seen one of those lately.


23 posted on 01/17/2007 11:37:42 AM PST by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

I'll call this Hagel does a Kegel, the wuss!


24 posted on 01/17/2007 11:43:01 AM PST by NonValueAdded (Pelosi, the call was for Comity, not Comedy. But thanks for the laughs. StarKisses, NVA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WBL 1952

"Hagel has no clue and never has."

Hagel is a public backstabber. McCain is too, but does it with an "aw shucks" style. Hagel is pure mean.


25 posted on 01/17/2007 11:43:38 AM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

I hope the President comes out on the day of such a resolution and argues forcefully that this resolution is not in the national interest.

It is tantamount to screaming at the coach during a game. It does not advance the game, but has a good chance of disrupting the players.


26 posted on 01/17/2007 11:44:49 AM PST by Paloma_55 (I may be a hateful bigot, but I still love you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ohioman

Yeah, right a consistent liberal is for smaller government including the second amendment, for massive tax cuts, and against racial preferences. If that is what you mean by "consistent liberal," I guess I'll have to plead guilty.


27 posted on 01/17/2007 11:44:52 AM PST by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

Why do RINOs and Dems need a resolution to do what they've been doing since the war began?


28 posted on 01/17/2007 11:47:28 AM PST by LIConFem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

They haven't called him Hagel (R-France) for a decade for nothing.


29 posted on 01/17/2007 11:48:03 AM PST by NeoCaveman (this is an Obamagasm free zone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright

Speaking of predictions, let's remember these, shall we?
-the "Arab Street" would explode
-Iraqi refugees would strain neighboring countries
-we'd lose 10,000 soldiers (in the actual war against Saddam)
-Iraq war would cause terrorist attacks back here
-Israel would be under siege (although this was probably wishful thinking)
-hundreds of oil fields would be set ablaze


30 posted on 01/17/2007 11:48:04 AM PST by threeleftsmakearight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright

Hagel is for limited Republican government. As for Iraq, the administration may have tried to sell it in Wilsonian terms, but the main purpose is to maintain an American presence in the Middle East. Hagel is not helping because he is obsessed with the rhetoric of the Vietnam era.


31 posted on 01/17/2007 11:48:13 AM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

What a Parliment of Metrosexuals. They don't have the stones to actually try and do something, so they make their pathetic little resolutions with no relevance and no ramifications and then pound their chests acting as though they had actually done something.

Meanwhile, real make reals decisions with real outcomes waving the nagging little gnats away with the brush of a hand.


32 posted on 01/17/2007 11:50:21 AM PST by Lee'sGhost (Crom! Non-Sequitur = Pee Wee Herman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: threeleftsmakearight

I was going down memory lane on the most popular predictions at FR. Yeah, you can find extreme predictions on on both sides that were wrong....though folks like Ron Paul were more careful. Interstingly, some of your "wrong" predictions were not so wrong after all. Iraqi refugees have indeed strained neighboring countries. The Christian population is rapidly declining, for example. Certainly nobody in their right mind is now actually moving to Iraq. The Arab Street hasn't exploded but Arabs (contra the Wilsonian predictions) have shown time and again that they have nothing but contempt for democracy in their votes.....so that's pretty much the same thing.


33 posted on 01/17/2007 11:54:47 AM PST by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

Supposedly, at the top of the hour, Hildabeaset is supposed to give a presser with HER plans for Iraq.

That NEW and IMPROVED plan..of "capping" the number of troops that can be in or sent to Iraq!!!

Add that to this stupid resolution...and al-queda and Sadr have the necessary impetus to just lay low...because they will be SURE that Americans will quit.

Also...any Iraqi that has helped our troops will probably be killed...so they will probably kill our troops first.

This is NOT the way to run a war....that you want to win.


34 posted on 01/17/2007 11:56:52 AM PST by Txsleuth (FREEPATHON TIME-Please become a monthly donor, or Dollar a Day donor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright

I'm not so sure neighboring countries have been "strained", they merely ignore the refugees much like they ignore their own people.
As for the street exploding, we all know what that meant.


35 posted on 01/17/2007 11:59:30 AM PST by threeleftsmakearight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: x1stcav
"The POS should switch parties."

I agree! Earlier today I sent Hagel an email telling him If he was truly a man of integrity he would announce his resignation from the republican party today and become what he truly is--a liberal democrat.
36 posted on 01/17/2007 11:59:57 AM PST by dmw (Aren't you glad you use common sense, don't you wish everybody did?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: threeleftsmakearight

It meant that the Arabs would turn against us and that has happened whenver they have had a chance to vote.


37 posted on 01/17/2007 12:00:18 PM PST by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Enchante
troop build up in Iraq "is not in the national interest,"

1. This is treason, plain and simple.

2. While I detest Hagel for helping the Democrats, there isn't a single post on the entire thread, that puts the blame where it belongs, on the Democrats, who are the ones who are doing this in the first place, because they are in power.

38 posted on 01/17/2007 12:00:59 PM PST by IntelliQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: threeleftsmakearight
Few know this but Sen, Hagel carries 50 lbs weights in his shoes. Most airheads need this help. Love to ask him a question, "Sen.,do you believe that the terrorists and murderers in Iraq will be hearten by this resolution or discouraged? Please just pick one answer, no spinning please.
39 posted on 01/17/2007 12:04:13 PM PST by neverhillorat (IF THE RATS WIN, WE ALL LOSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

Who other then democrats give a crap? Suck it up Hagel!


40 posted on 01/17/2007 12:06:10 PM PST by linn37 (Love your Phlebotomist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson