Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cheap, safe drug kills most cancers
New Scientist ^ | 1/17/06 | Andy Coghlan

Posted on 01/17/2007 5:28:53 PM PST by LibWhacker

It sounds almost too good to be true: a cheap and simple drug that kills almost all cancers by switching off their “immortality”. The drug, dichloroacetate (DCA), has already been used for years to treat rare metabolic disorders and so is known to be relatively safe.

It also has no patent, meaning it could be manufactured for a fraction of the cost of newly developed drugs.

Evangelos Michelakis of the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada, and his colleagues tested DCA on human cells cultured outside the body and found that it killed lung, breast and brain cancer cells, but not healthy cells. Tumours in rats deliberately infected with human cancer also shrank drastically when they were fed DCA-laced water for several weeks.

(Excerpt) Read more at newscientist.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cancerdrug; cancers; cheap; dca; dichloroacetate; drug; health; healthcare; kills; prescriptiondrugs; wonderdrugs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

1 posted on 01/17/2007 5:28:57 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Maybe we will be lucky, and cancer will go the way of many other diseases......

brought low by a shot in the butt.


2 posted on 01/17/2007 5:30:57 PM PST by Dreagon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker


Another cure for cancer - where are my smokes!


3 posted on 01/17/2007 5:31:03 PM PST by spanalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Bookmark.


4 posted on 01/17/2007 5:33:38 PM PST by Kevmo (Darn, if only I had signed up 4 days earlier, I'd have a 3-digit Freeper #)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spanalot
I don't think it works with emphysema or heart disease, both also side effects of smoking.
5 posted on 01/17/2007 5:34:33 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: spanalot

Kick em now, while you've got the muscle.


6 posted on 01/17/2007 5:35:00 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I hope it turns out.


7 posted on 01/17/2007 5:35:10 PM PST by Eagles6 (Dig deeper, more ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spanalot

Good heavens! A cheap and effective anti-cancer drug without a patent? ZOIKS! Drug company executives must be fainting by the dozens.


8 posted on 01/17/2007 5:35:10 PM PST by Enterprise (Drop pork bombs on the Islamofascist wankers. Praise the Lord and pass the hammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Interesting.


9 posted on 01/17/2007 5:35:52 PM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Interesting....and many internet links to real scientists and clinical studies (not snake oil BS)....


10 posted on 01/17/2007 5:39:33 PM PST by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
This was also posted: Small molecule offers hope for cancer treatment

Technically; you're a dupe.

11 posted on 01/17/2007 5:39:59 PM PST by AFreeBird (If American "cowboy diplomacy" did not exist, it would be necessary to invent it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Unless the FDA fast-tracks it, it will be years before US patients see it...
12 posted on 01/17/2007 5:41:48 PM PST by GoldCountryRedneck ("Idiocy - Never under estimate the power of stupid people in large numbers" - despair.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Yawn. Bird flu and third world cancer cures suppressed by the evil military industrial complex.

Heard it all in the 70s when it was swine flu and apricot pit extract.
13 posted on 01/17/2007 5:43:54 PM PST by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Wow, this is incredible.

Sure hope it proves true.


14 posted on 01/17/2007 5:44:35 PM PST by upchuck (The American coup de grâce is well under way. Thus far, the Donks haven't had to fire a shot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

He is not a dupe, but his post may be.

I'll give him a pass.


15 posted on 01/17/2007 5:44:44 PM PST by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

Technically, not; different article and author.


16 posted on 01/17/2007 5:47:23 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

22 years too late in my husband's case.


17 posted on 01/17/2007 5:48:59 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

No Patent?

Nobody will ever credibly promote it, because if a company can't protect it's profitablity, they'd rather undermine it.
And the Doctor's will join the drug companies in undermining it for the same reason.

Do you have any idea how HUGE the cancer treatment industry is???
I only truly learned after going through radiation at one facility and chemo at another, during combined treatment.
It's amazing how many patients they crank through there in any given week!


18 posted on 01/17/2007 5:49:30 PM PST by G Larry (Only strict constructionists on the Supreme Court!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

I suspect it's more junk science from our friends up north.


19 posted on 01/17/2007 5:50:03 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Since the drug is already used to treat a disease (I assume with FDA approval), why should any drug company that wants to sell it need to re-prove its safety, at least at approved dosage? The risks should already be documented. Drug companies can't market the drug as a 'cancer killer', but doctors can prescribe a drug for anything they want.


20 posted on 01/17/2007 5:51:04 PM PST by KingKenrod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson