Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

When's the last time the ACLU actully took up a good cause?
1 posted on 01/19/2007 8:07:56 AM PST by the_devils_advocate_666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: the_devils_advocate_666

Do they have a problem with dress codes also?


2 posted on 01/19/2007 8:10:08 AM PST by Long Island Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the_devils_advocate_666

Isn't the Kokoamos Island Bar, Grill and Yacht Club's a private business (or in the case club) and can't the owners determine their own rules for admittance?

The Anti-American Commie Lovin Union can go to hell.


3 posted on 01/19/2007 8:11:26 AM PST by VA_Gentleman (R.I.P. Captain James Edge - friend, father, and soldier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the_devils_advocate_666

Freedom of association means that the business can serve whoever it wishes to associate with. If it chooses not to server to people who are drunk or smokers or wearing beads or dreadlocks, it has that right.

If someone wishes to patronize the place, they need to abide by the owners rules.


5 posted on 01/19/2007 8:19:03 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the_devils_advocate_666

I've seen more white girls wearing dread locks than blacks....maybe it is my location.


6 posted on 01/19/2007 8:21:17 AM PST by ThisLittleLightofMine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the_devils_advocate_666

I am curious to know the Bar owners rational for the dreadlock ban. (Not that it necessarily makes a difference)


9 posted on 01/19/2007 8:25:27 AM PST by joebuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the_devils_advocate_666

From another source--

"When she complained to the club the following day, she was advised to visit the owner's "urban" club in Newport News."

Heh. Sort of like the Episcopal church. You know, they put up a branch in the poor part of town to keep the riff-raff from going to the main place downtown.

That said, corn rows is a racial affectation, the barring of which predominately bars blacks. How you feel about the Jim Crow south doubtless dictates where you think these chips should fall.


16 posted on 01/19/2007 8:43:12 AM PST by gcruse (http://garycruse.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the_devils_advocate_666

If the bar turns away white girls wearing cornrows and admits blacks who aren't, I don't see any validity to this.


18 posted on 01/19/2007 8:45:34 AM PST by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the_devils_advocate_666

Skokie?


20 posted on 01/19/2007 8:51:47 AM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the_devils_advocate_666
Axl Rose.


23 posted on 01/19/2007 8:57:24 AM PST by SeafoodGumbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the_devils_advocate_666

26 posted on 01/19/2007 9:02:56 AM PST by Alouette (Learned Mother of Zion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the_devils_advocate_666

My sense is that this suit will fail, cf. Washington v. Davis. Facially neutral policies are OK even if they affect one racial group more than others. They're not banning black people, they're only banning a hair style that is followed ?predominantly? by blacks. Now if they let a white person or Asian person in with that hair style, and deny to the black, THEN the bar will have a problem.


28 posted on 01/19/2007 9:07:52 AM PST by rudy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the_devils_advocate_666

The AMbulance Chasing Lawyers Union makes it up as they go. They are clearly the most destructive force in the US today, followed closely by the democrat party.


37 posted on 01/19/2007 9:50:45 AM PST by twonie (Just because there are fewer of us don't mean we are wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the_devils_advocate_666

Some yachts are corporate owned.

The incident(s) took place over 6 months ago.

Are Evans and Hines aquainted? How long does it take to file a lawsuit? Do they really want justice or money?


38 posted on 01/19/2007 10:13:46 AM PST by Goldie Lurks (professional moonbat catcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the_devils_advocate_666
When's the last time the ACLU actully took up a good cause?

Must be a slow 'civil liberties violation' week for the ACLU. Carrying the banner for dreadlocks! Whew! This one could make it all the way up to the Supreme Court! LOLOLOL!

41 posted on 01/19/2007 10:19:51 AM PST by uncitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the_devils_advocate_666

Sounds like an ACLU setup to me. Perhaps they needed to MLK more funds from us taxpayers.

We have a bar here near Orlando that had a sign in the window that said NO COLORS.

Of course, they meant GANG COLORS but that didn't stop some empty heads from taking up the cause of why this bar was keeping the Black man down!


45 posted on 01/19/2007 10:29:15 AM PST by VeniVidiVici (Celebrate Monocacy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the_devils_advocate_666

This seems like a stupid ass rule, but if a bar wants to have it, so be it, I'd go elsewhere.. If I showed up with a friend who wore these hairstyles and we were denied entry, I'd go elsewhere.

I've been places where I wasn't allowed in because I was carrying my motor cycle helmet...

I don't think anyones civil rights have been violated, in fact, while the hairstyles listed may be worn mainly by blacks, most blacks I know don't wear these styles at all... so I can't see how you can claim overall racial discrimination.


53 posted on 01/19/2007 12:08:19 PM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the_devils_advocate_666
A club has the right to expect its members meet certain dress and good appearance standards. I don't see where that's a civil rights issue.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

56 posted on 01/19/2007 12:55:23 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson