PING!
PING!
What's that you say? They won a Pulitzer for Duranty's blatant fabrications about Stalin's crimes against humanity, and never gave the prize back in disgrace? Oh, never mind.
Good one. I didn't read the Times story closely, so I didn't catch any of this, and evidently other Freepers were fooled, too.
We all know that the culture has a lot of rot. Good to know it isn't as bad as the Times would like it to be. No doubt every new divorce delights them.
What I don't understand is why anyone even bothers to buy this waste of forrest resources. It's been evident ever since the The Great Famine in the Ukraine that the NYT's is biased and only prints what it's owners want the public to believe, not truth.
Latest findings by experts show, in terms of accuracy, The National Enquirer now leads The New York Times.
If the NYT was free I wouldn't read it. I mean, why bother? Everything in it is either a lie or suspect.
Lying Media
One has to wonder if even the ball scores in the NYT are accurate!
Bump
fyi
I was fooled once again, because I failed to apply dsc's first law: All liberals lie all the time.
This should be very clear to all Freepers: The NYTpromotes the homosexual agenda whenever it can. This story was to disrespect Christian marriage. Their plan is to replace Christian marriage with queer-unions. They are well on their way to success. Keep your powder dry!
Medved did a great job on cleaning their clock on this one. Wish he could lay off a bit on the Corsi thing.
Roberts even put the Old Grey Lady in the Not Married column.
The NY Times wants to undermine and diminish conventional marriage because their signature issue is gay "marriage." If they can't have it for their swishy constituency, they'll sour-grape it for everybody.
d.o.l.
Criminal Number 18F
Democrats, liberals, and Big Media in general have a huge anti-marriage agenda. The more people they can convince to follow this lifestyle, the more votes they have, and the more customers they have for their newspapers and television news shows. Period. These groups LOVE the single, unmarried woman, either gay or straight. Single mothers are heroes to this crowd. Ever spent much time in an Episcopal Church (particularly in a blue state or any large metropolitan area), in a college faculty lounge, or a Democratic political rally? If you’re a long-time married, and particularly married to #1, chances are, you’re going to feel like an outsider!
Has the Times replied back to this story and their presentation of the facts?
Did Maureen Dowd write the Times article? I know she's been having so much trouble getting a man lately that she wrote an anti-male book entitled "Are Men Necessary?"
ProLife Ping!
If anyone wants on or off my ProLife Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.