Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why anti-immigration conservatives fell flat in 2006
Reason magazine ^ | February 2007 | David Weigel

Posted on 01/27/2007 8:55:29 AM PST by spintreebob

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-254 last
To: mthom
Of course those were major issues, for the left.

There are two important points on immigration.
First, it didn't save anyone
Second it came into play in only about 15 races and the GOP lost most of those.

The general public may have been slow to get there, for several good reasons, but they are well informed on immigration as well as other issues that are dear to the far right. If you look at Hayworth's TV ad where he is spittin' and snarlin' the immigration and Mexico totalization mis-info, he sounds just like one of the kooks at FR.

The residents of Scottsdale are not ignorant and they have common sense also. They didn't buy it.

241 posted on 01/29/2007 1:28:01 PM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
As the memo and the polling shows, the voters want enforcement(as in the strong support for the referendums) and reform.

Hayworth went with enforcement only, and lost.

242 posted on 01/29/2007 1:33:42 PM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
"This causes some trouble. We can't deport them all to either country, as neither country will take the other parent. Neither country really wants the american citizens either. The two have NO family in either country of origin, no place to live, no place to go to. "

Tough. Their home and business are fruits of the poisoned tree. There's an old expression: "hard cases make bad law". There are thousands of sob stories over taxes - if not millions. I don't see the government not enforcing the tax code because of them.

A national ID card will only be imposed against citizens and legal residents. What's more, it WILL be faked.

"Your plan for these people is simple -- even though they have paid their taxes, learned our language, and assimilated into our society, you must kick them out -- no exceptions. There are other people waiting in line that you would much rather have in the country than these people. "

Yes. That is the law. They (legals) do us the courtesy of ASKING to be let in and complying with our laws. Your example family did not. It's not as if they hasn't been a series of rolling amnesties ever since the 80s....
243 posted on 01/29/2007 5:51:21 PM PST by EnochPowellWasRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: EnochPowellWasRight

She's such an idiot. Maybe she should resign just for that. The Karen from last year would never have resigned in a crisis just to protect her husband from a weasel.


244 posted on 01/29/2007 6:32:35 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Oops, wrong thread. back to the 24 live thread.


245 posted on 01/29/2007 6:33:17 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: haplesswanderer

wanderer,
Are you referring to me as "moderate" ?

The simple fact is that a big government, expensive, anti-free market response to immigration is not conservative. Population control rhetoric dominates the anti-immigration movement. This turns off social conservatives.

Trying to wrap anti-immigration in the label "conservative" does not make it so.


246 posted on 01/30/2007 4:28:14 PM PST by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: mo

Rove was against the NRCC TV ads from what I hear. The house hired their own professional consultants to develop the ads. Those consultants should refund their consulting fees.

It is NOT in the interest of corporate America to support any mean-spiritedness. It is in their best interest to allow the free market to rule with no labeling of workers as "illegal". It is also in their interest for immigration to separate out terrorists, welfare parasites and truly bad people from the ordinary workers.


247 posted on 01/30/2007 4:32:58 PM PST by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita
What' wrong with wire transfers? My grandfather did the same thing! Besides, Wal Mart and Mickey D's would lose alot of business if it weren't for the Mexicans! ;-)

Nevertheless, the concern about "wire transfers" is RETARDED! We don't live in a "zero sum" economy, despite what populist retards like Lou Dobbs think.

Let's face it: the ONLY people who care about illegal immigration as their main issue are CONSERVATIVES. Most swing voters either shrug or don't give a sh-t. It doesn't help that the only folks who show up at anti-illegal rallies are a bunch of pot bellied, ball cap wearing, American Splendor reject.

248 posted on 01/30/2007 4:36:58 PM PST by Clemenza (NO to Rudy in 2008! The politics of Rockefeller and the attitude of a Gambino.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob

What you just posted, summarized: "Real" conservatives are stupid, dishonest and out of touch with reality. Yep. Sounds about right.


249 posted on 01/30/2007 4:44:27 PM PST by Wolfstar ("A nation that hates its Horatios is already in grave danger of losing its soul." Dr. Jack Wheeler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob

It is in corporate interests, however, to continue to have access to a "disposable" worker pool....effective border management interferes with that goal. Effective anti-illegal immigration politics , from that perspective, is contrary to their interests. The best way to derail an anti-illegal immigration politician is to label him anti-immigrant.(or, for that matter, an anti-illegal immigration party)


250 posted on 01/30/2007 7:06:34 PM PST by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
...the ONLY people who care about illegal immigration as their main issue are CONSERVATIVES.

Such as Senator Tom Coburn, who has been outstanding in fighting illegal immigration.

It doesn't help that the only folks who show up at anti-illegal rallies are a bunch of pot bellied, ball cap wearing, American Splendor reject.

What was the date and location of this event you witnessed? Would the above be your description of James Sensenbrenner, the Congressman who co-sponsored HR4437? Would it be your description of FReepers who showed up to rally in support of the Minuteman caravan last Summer?

Besides, who DOESN'T wear a ball cap these days and who has an absolutely flat abdomen? Would that fit the description of "small 'l' libertarians" such as yourself?

251 posted on 01/30/2007 7:25:04 PM PST by La Enchiladita (People get ready . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: All

LOL... I've been to some anti-illegal rallies that have had people who are extremely well trained & physically fit. Didn't realize that people who went to rallies needed to fit the Cosmo & GQ perfect image that the media likes to portray. Rather than criticizing the people who actually get up and go to rallies, why not talk about those who don't care that there is an enormous number of Americans who have been harmed by the criminals who pass through the nation's open borders. There are many unnamed victims who have been killed, raped, robbed, crippled and otherwise personally violated. It is particularly shocking that even in post-911 America, the government still refuses to protect the people in the most basic ways from the world's terrorists and criminals who enter at will to do as they please.


252 posted on 02/04/2007 12:28:53 AM PST by haplesswanderer (Tomorrow belongs to us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob

I thought that conservatives actually wanted the laws to be followed and wanted to stop criminals from entering the country. Illegals do not belong here. Let them get in line and wait like the rest of the world has to do.


253 posted on 02/04/2007 12:36:41 AM PST by haplesswanderer (Tomorrow belongs to us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: haplesswanderer

Wanderer, my friend.
1) Illegals ARE waiting patiently in line. Most immigrants FIRST come here illegally. THEN they get in line to make it legal. As you can well imagine, the government bureaucrats do not move very quickly.

2) If we make something legal, then it is no longer illegal. Problem solved.

Now let's get to the important stuff.

Dave Pittinger, former president of TapRoot is running for village trustee. He'd love your support and if you could volunteer for him big time, a little time, whatever you can manage.


254 posted on 02/04/2007 1:03:56 PM PST by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-254 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson