Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breaking: 'Hoax Devices' Found At Several Boston Locations (Several 'Suspicous Packages' Found)
Boston.com ^ | January 31, 2007

Posted on 01/31/2007 12:04:30 PM PST by Howlin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 601-620621-640641-660661-664 last
To: California74; txflake
I don't think so. Showing the bottom of one's shoe (cross legs so shoe is in their direction) or take off your shoe and wave it or hit him with it and that's the equivalent of the bird. :)

Cursing a man's mustache is apparently a harsh insult, too.
661 posted on 02/02/2007 8:13:40 AM PST by hummingbird (All opinions spoken from my armchair and have no actual bearing on the war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
Here's some pictures of the signs.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/vanderlin/358744332/in/photostream/

http://wwwimage.cbsnews.com/images/2007/01/31/image2419978g.jpg

The LEDs are transparent, no C4 in them. The circuit board /panel the LEDs are mounted on is very thin. No C4 in it.

The batteries are visible, I guess you could argue that the bomb material is in fake Duracell batteries, but then you'd have to explain what is powering all those LEDs, and these have been in place for weeks. A couple of them could theoretically be dummy cells with explosives inside. It wouldn't be enough to do much to a bridge pylon, especially since the charge wouldn't be placed or shaped properly for that effect.

If someone wanted to make a bomb, why would they rely on small fake batteries rather than an enclosed area at the back of the sign that wouldn't look suspicious, but could contain a significant amount of explosive.

Why would you be suspicious of this being a bomb?

I could hold enough C4 in the palm of my hand to blow the engine of your car up through the roof of your garage.

I doubt it. High explosives aren't good a moving mass, and my big block Chevy engine isn't exactly light.

High explosives are good at tearing things apart, but you'd want to use a lower velocity explosive to send my engine flying.

You could probably send parts of my engine through the roof, but if you want to send the whole engine, you've got the wrong type of explosive, and you'd need to direct the force properly.

I don't have any personal experience with C4, but I've helped a friend set a 2 pound KinePac charge. I was pretty impressed with what a high explosive can do, but I'm pretty skeptical that it could send my engine through the roof of my garage. That's not what it's good at doing. It creates an intense impulse of pressure which destroys things well, but doesn't move mass well.

662 posted on 02/02/2007 8:49:25 AM PST by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 658 | View Replies]

To: untrained skeptic

Holy Cow. You have to be kidding me that all that panic was over this bit of art. What insanity!


663 posted on 02/02/2007 8:52:55 AM PST by GregoryFul (There's no truth in the New York Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 662 | View Replies]

To: GregoryFul

It will be proved in court...that these 'artistic' losers...phoned in at least ONE OF THE BOMB THREATS TO
AUTHORITIES!

Then how are u gonna 'feel' about it?


664 posted on 02/03/2007 9:48:31 PM PST by penelopesire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 663 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 601-620621-640641-660661-664 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson