Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AQ Khan will not be handed over to US: Pak
Hindustan Times ^ | February 1, 2007

Posted on 02/01/2007 3:27:47 PM PST by mylife

AQ Khan will not be handed over to US: Pak

Asian News International

Islamabad, February 1, 2007|13:18 IST

Disgraced Pakistan nuclear scientist AQ Khan will not be handed over to Washington for questioning despite an American bill, which could force Islamabad to do so.

Pakistan Foreign Office spokesperson Tasneem Aslam told reporters here that Islamabad is hoping that the Bush administration will intervene to make the final legislation more balanced, and added that US queries should be forwarded to the Pakistan Government, which would investigate and then respond.

The proposed law called the Nuclear Black Market Counter Terrorism Act, recently passed by the US House of Representatives, requires President Bush to submit a report identifying any country or person connected with transactions with the nuclear proliferation network that supplied Libya, Iran, North Korea within 90 days of its enactment.

Another provision of the proposed law, which if enacted, could force Pakistan to hand over Khan, says the President will send to Congressional committees a description of the extent a country is cooperating with the US to stop proliferation, including the degree to which the it has satisfied requests for information and grant of access to key persons involved in proliferation.

Emphasising that Pakistan was a 'nuclear state,' Aslam said, "The Senate is yet to come up with its own version. The two versions will be discussed in the conference stage."

Khan is currently held under house arrest in Islamabad after he confessed of proliferating nuclear technology to Iran, North Korea and Libya.

The bill was adopted along with another which required President Bush to certify that Pakistan was doing all it could to counter the Taliban and Al-Qaeda before financial aid was released.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aqkhan; islamicnukes
Mushareff is holding AQ Kahn as a bargaining chip
1 posted on 02/01/2007 3:27:49 PM PST by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mylife

No way he gives him up. Kahn is a huge hero in Pakistan.


2 posted on 02/01/2007 3:30:08 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife
Mushareff is holding AQ Kahn as a bargaining chip

No, Musharraf is holding nuclear weapons as the bargaining chip. Khan is the joker in the deck.

3 posted on 02/01/2007 3:42:27 PM PST by HAL9000 (Get a Mac - The Ultimate FReeping Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife

"the President will send to Congressional committees a description of the extent a country is cooperating with the US to stop proliferation, including the degree to which the it has satisfied requests for information"

So the President, whomever it happens to be, sends a report saying what a good job the Pakis are doing, albeit is a lie, no one complains and it's business as usual. This is how we handle these things.


4 posted on 02/01/2007 3:54:47 PM PST by gcruse (http://garycruse.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife
Mushareff is holding AQ Kahn as a bargaining chip

I don't think so. Khan's a national hero and giving him up would sharply increase the possibility of coup in Pakistan (imagine a hardcore Islamist regime in possession of Pakistan's Bomb). He is also supposed to have an "insurance policy" collection of files overseas, containing damaging information which would be released if something happened to him.

All in all, he's a seriously thorny problem.
5 posted on 02/01/2007 3:59:56 PM PST by MirrorField (Just an opinion from atheist, minarchist and small-l libertarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Good. If he was in US possession, he'd probably have every liberal organization, the US Congress - including neutered Republicans - liberal judges and the ACLU demanding his release.


6 posted on 02/01/2007 4:03:05 PM PST by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Keeping him under house arrest is the best Pakistan can do with Kahn. No way will they extradite him, and it wouldn't help us if they did.


7 posted on 02/01/2007 4:06:08 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife
Image hosted by Photobucket.com worldcourt, where you...???
8 posted on 02/01/2007 4:27:53 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

house arrest? bigf'n deal
I'll bet you he's on the net....
sales and tech transfers are at an all time high

and there at the forefront of the list is Iran


9 posted on 02/01/2007 5:21:32 PM PST by himno hero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mylife
I fear the Wrath of Kahn. Where is William Shatner now that we need him.
10 posted on 02/01/2007 5:45:10 PM PST by Brucifer (JF'n Kerry- "That's not just a paper cut, it's a Purple Heart!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson