Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Perry orders anti-cancer vaccine for schoolgirls
Houston Chronicle/AP ^ | Feb. 2, 2007 | LIZ AUSTIN PETERSON

Posted on 02/02/2007 1:28:44 PM PST by YCTHouston

AUSTIN — Gov. Rick Perry ordered today that schoolgirls in Texas must be vaccinated against the sexually transmitted virus that causes cervical cancer, making Texas the first state to require the shots.

The girls will have to get Merck & Co.'s new vaccine against strains of the human papillomavirus, or HPV, that are responsible for most cases of cervical cancer.

Merck is bankrolling efforts to pass laws in state legislatures across the country mandating it Gardasil vaccine for girls as young as 11 or 12. It doubled its lobbying budget in Texas and has funneled money through Women in Government, an advocacy group made up of female state legislators around the country.

Details of the order were not immediately available, but the governor's office confirmed to The Associated Press that he was signing the order and he would comment Friday afternoon.

Perry has several ties to Merck and Women in Government. One of the drug company's three lobbyists in Texas is Mike Toomey, his former chief of staff. His current chief of staff's mother-in-law, Texas Republican state Rep. Dianne White Delisi, is a state director for Women in Government.

Toomey was expected to be able to woo conservative legislators concerned about the requirement stepping on parent's rights and about signaling tacit approval of sexual activity to young girls. Delisi, as head of the House public health committee, which likely would have considered legislation filed by a Democratic member, also would have helped ease conservative opposition.

Perry also received $6,000 from Merck's political action committee during his re-election campaign.

It wasn't immediately clear how long the order would last and whether the legislation was still necessary. However it could have been difficult to muster support from lawmakers who champion abstinence education and parents' rights.

Perry, a conservative Christian who opposes abortion rights and stem-cell research using embryonic cells, counts on the religious right for his political base.

But he has said the cervical cancer vaccine is no different than the one that protects children against polio.

"If there are diseases in our society that are going to cost us large amounts of money, it just makes good economic sense, not to mention the health and well being of these individuals to have those vaccines available," he said.

Texas allows parents to opt out of inoculations by filing an affidavit stating that he or she objected to the vaccine for religious or philosophical reasons.

Even with such provisions, however, conservative groups say mandates take away parents' rights to be the primary medical decision maker for their children.

The federal government approved Gardasil in June, and a government advisory panel has recommended that all girls get the shots at 11 and 12, before they are likely to be sexually active.

The New Jersey-based drug company could generate billions in sales if Gardasil — at $360 for the three-shot regimen — were made mandatory across the country. Most insurance companies now cover the vaccine, which has been shown to have no serious side effects.

Merck spokeswoman Janet Skidmore would not say how much the company is spending on lobbyists or how much it has donated to Women in Government. Susan Crosby, the group's president, also declined to specify how much the drug company gave.

A top official from Merck's vaccine division sits on Women in Government's business council, and many of the bills around the country have been introduced by members of Women in Government.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 1parentalrights; aagreatthing; abortion; abstinence; adiosmofo; bigbrother; childhood; childhoodinnocence; children; closethomoperry; corporatism; donperrito; eugenics; everyonehasaids; executiveorder; fiat; filthypolitician; gardasil; genitalwarts; governorhairspray; govgoodhair; govwatch; govzoolander; health; hellno; heterosexualagenda; hip; homeschool; homosexualagenda; hpv; hugochavez; humanpapillomavirus; ignorance; impeachment; impeachperry; indoctrination; innocence; itcantstopaids; merck; moralabsolutes; nannystate; naral; now; parentalrights; perry; perverts; plannedbarrenhood; populationcontrol; prickferry; queergovernor; rapists; rickperry; rinorick; scaredofscience; sex; sexobject; sexobjects; sexualizingchildren; socialism; socializedmedicine; stds; texas; thisisbstellsomeone; tramps; vaccinations; vd; whore; womyn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 751-786 next last

1 posted on 02/02/2007 1:28:47 PM PST by YCTHouston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: YCTHouston
which has been shown to have no serious side effects.

I am sure that this same thing was said about Thalidomide at one point.

2 posted on 02/02/2007 1:32:15 PM PST by ConservaTexan (February 6, 1911)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YCTHouston

I can't say that I agree with the critics on this one. There's an easy opt-out clause, and it appears to be a safe anti-carcinogen.


3 posted on 02/02/2007 1:32:22 PM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YCTHouston

Perry = whore of the pharmaceuticals.


4 posted on 02/02/2007 1:33:18 PM PST by lqclamar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YCTHouston

Gads! How much worse would it be if we had elected a dim or a kook as governor?


5 posted on 02/02/2007 1:33:37 PM PST by basil (Exercise your Second Amendment rights--buy another gun today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservaTexan

Um, thalidomide is still around and still prescribed today - just not to women who are pregnant or who could become pregnant. It also wasn't thoroughly tested, and apparently this stuff has been.


6 posted on 02/02/2007 1:34:15 PM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: YCTHouston

Lonestartimes.com has posted their take on the issue, essentially Perry has labeled Texas girls as sluts.

http://www.lonestartimes.com/


7 posted on 02/02/2007 1:34:39 PM PST by YCTHouston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YCTHouston

I understand that this injection will probably save lives. I find it to be a huge intrusion by goverment to MANDATE that any American be injected with ANYTHING.


8 posted on 02/02/2007 1:35:06 PM PST by passionfruit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr
I can't say that I agree with the critics on this one. There's an easy opt-out clause, and it appears to be a safe anti-carcinogen.

Some people see this as the government telling girls to go out and have as much sex as they want. They can't see that this vaccine is a way to reduce a certain type of cancer.

9 posted on 02/02/2007 1:35:32 PM PST by COEXERJ145 (Bush Derangement Syndrome Has Reached Pandemic Levels on Free Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: basil
What is going on with Perry??????????

I am livid over this!

Perry, of all people....Texas, of all places!!!!!!

10 posted on 02/02/2007 1:35:33 PM PST by Guenevere (Duncan Hunter for President....2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr
There's an easy opt-out clause...

Have you got a link? I'd like to read it :)

...and it appears to be a safe anti-carcinogen.

But it's not a panacea. And boys don't have to get it. Which is why I don't think it should be shoved down parents' throats.

11 posted on 02/02/2007 1:36:49 PM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: YCTHouston
Perry has several ties to Merck and Women in Government. One of the drug company's three lobbyists in Texas is Mike Toomey, his former chief of staff. His current chief of staff's mother-in-law, Texas Republican state Rep. Dianne White Delisi, is a state director for Women in Government.

As always, follow the money, ladies and gentlemen.

You know things are bad when politicians don't even try to cover up their corruption anymore.

12 posted on 02/02/2007 1:36:53 PM PST by CrawDaddyCA (Paul/Tancredo 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CrawDaddyCA

Rep. Dianne White Delisi is also one of the major heirs to the Scott & White Hospital fortune, so naturally she should be chairing our Public Health committee.


13 posted on 02/02/2007 1:38:13 PM PST by YCTHouston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ConservaTexan
I'd want proof of no ill effects after a 20 year study...

I can understand ordering vaccines for contagious diseases like Measles and Mumps.. but this is going too far. Is this the way the Republican part is going? Nanny State like the Libs?

I'm concerned..
14 posted on 02/02/2007 1:38:20 PM PST by divine_moment_of_facts ("Listen to the sustain!" "I'm not hearing anything." "You would thought, if it were playing.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: YCTHouston

Time for home schooling.


15 posted on 02/02/2007 1:39:21 PM PST by OldFriend (Swiftboating - Sinking a politician's Ship of Fools by Torpedoes of Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YCTHouston
But he has said the cervical cancer vaccine is no different than the one that protects children against polio.

Maybe and maybe not. However I don't recall polio being a STD. This pulls the rug from under abstinence education and parental rights--waiver or no waiver.
16 posted on 02/02/2007 1:39:23 PM PST by stentorian conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Guenevere

What makes me most mad is that he didn't even attempt to pass legislation, as Merck is pushing in a bunch of other states, he saved them the trouble and just issued an Executive Order. No need to call our elected representatives and voice our opinions now!


17 posted on 02/02/2007 1:39:50 PM PST by YCTHouston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

Work for Merck, do you?


18 posted on 02/02/2007 1:40:03 PM PST by OldFriend (Swiftboating - Sinking a politician's Ship of Fools by Torpedoes of Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: YCTHouston

More of government protecting us from ourselves. If we get socialized medicine, expect the government to feel justified in regulating all lifestyle choices, due to the fact that the taxpayers are paying for treatment of injuries and illnesses covered by such choices. Goodbye fast food. Goodbye smoking anywhere. Goodbye drinking. Goodbye private life. Goodbye freedom, hello nanny state 24/7.


19 posted on 02/02/2007 1:40:08 PM PST by Emile (New Orleans: Will the levees hold next time? Don't bet your life on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
And boys don't have to get it.

It hasn't been tested in boys, yet. Once it has been, I'm certain it will become mandatory for them as well.

20 posted on 02/02/2007 1:40:23 PM PST by CholeraJoe (Spork weasels ain't afraid of nuthin' but running out of sardines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
The cancer "vaccine" works by preventing HPV infection, right? HPV infection can lead to cancer of the cervix. So why not make boys take it at the same time that the girls take it? I would prefer just to eradicate the dang thing. Worked, almost, for smallpox and polio.
21 posted on 02/02/2007 1:40:33 PM PST by DalcoTX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: YCTHouston; wagglebee

Wow. He is REQUIRING the shots?

Follow the $$$ has never been creepier after reading this article. Disgraceful.


22 posted on 02/02/2007 1:41:09 PM PST by cgk (Republicanism didn't make Conservatives a majority. Conservatism made Republicans a majority. [NEWT])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lqclamar

That seems a bit harsh.


23 posted on 02/02/2007 1:41:32 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

"Texas allows parents to opt out of inoculations by filing an affidavit stating that he or she objected to the vaccine for religious or philosophical reasons."


Also, boys don't get cervical cancer (check your anatomy knowledge!) If there was an inoculation against prostate cancer, I'm sure it'd be mandatory, too - would you be complaining that the girls didn't have to get that vaccination?


24 posted on 02/02/2007 1:41:48 PM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kermit the Frog Does theWatusi

Illuminati population control. Watch for the infertility reports and hormonal irregularities.


25 posted on 02/02/2007 1:42:08 PM PST by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: YCTHouston
Gov. Rick Perry ordered today that schoolgirls in Texas must be vaccinated against the sexually transmitted virus that causes cervical cancer, making Texas the first state to require the shots.

Just what a lot of us predicted. What we didn't predict was that Republicans would be taking the lead on it.

Bad idea. Publicize the vaccine. Make it widely available. But to make a vaccine against an STD mandatory? Bad, bad idea.
26 posted on 02/02/2007 1:42:21 PM PST by Antoninus ( Who is Duncan Hunter? Find out....www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: divine_moment_of_facts
I'd want proof of no ill effects after a 20 year study...

I can understand ordering vaccines for contagious diseases like Measles and Mumps.. but this is going too far. Is this the way the Republican part is going? Nanny State like the Libs?

I'm concerned..

Exactly! My 11 year old daughter will not get this vaccine and I will be contacting Perry's office soon.

27 posted on 02/02/2007 1:42:26 PM PST by ConservaTexan (February 6, 1911)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe

Well, boys don't get cervical cancer, but I'm sure as soon as Merck can conceive of something to protect boys from themselves for $350 a pill, they'll force that down our throats too.


28 posted on 02/02/2007 1:42:28 PM PST by YCTHouston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: divine_moment_of_facts

"I can understand ordering vaccines for contagious diseases like Measles and Mumps.. but this is going too far."

Exactly what I was thinking. Measles, mumps, polio you can all catch just from wandering around aimlessly at the Walmart. HPV can't be. This vaccine should be 100% voluntary.


29 posted on 02/02/2007 1:42:45 PM PST by dha (The safest place to be is within the will of God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

Nope - but how is GlaxoSmithKline treating you these days, hm?


30 posted on 02/02/2007 1:43:02 PM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

"If there was an inoculation against prostate cancer, I'm sure it'd be mandatory, too "

Shhh...don't give Merck and their lobbyists any ideas.


31 posted on 02/02/2007 1:43:33 PM PST by YCTHouston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
And boys don't have to get it. Which is why I don't think it should be shoved down parents' throats.

That's probably because boys can't get cervical cancer.

32 posted on 02/02/2007 1:43:52 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

The Girls GET the virus from the boys! How about curing the boys first?


33 posted on 02/02/2007 1:43:58 PM PST by divine_moment_of_facts ("Listen to the sustain!" "I'm not hearing anything." "You would thought, if it were playing.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: dha

Psst - HPV-types can also be transmitted through simple contact, not just sexual intercourse.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_papillomavirus


34 posted on 02/02/2007 1:45:19 PM PST by Spktyr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: divine_moment_of_facts

OK, so now you're advocating that we mandate an untested (in males) vaccination?


35 posted on 02/02/2007 1:46:13 PM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: passionfruit

If there wasn't an opt-out clause, I'd agree with you. But so long as you can sign yourself OUT of vaccinations, the "mandate" isn't really a mandate, it is just a strongly worded suggestion.

But the issue of whether the state should require ANY vaccinations is separate from whether they should require THIS vaccination.

BTW, as a quasi-libertarian, I am still in favor of vaccination programs, because it IS an area where government has to protect the common good, and only government can do so.

If every other person gets vaccinated, it is in your own interest NOT to be, since you can't get the disease from anybody else and you might be hurt by the vaccine.

But if everybody acts in their own interest, thousands, maybe millions, will die because nobody will get the vaccine.

It is a classic case where government is necessary for society to benefit as a whole where individual greed does not lead to optimal outcomes, or even good outcomes.

It's like having laws about which direction to drive on the street, and speed limits and stop signs. On an individual basis, you could violate all those things from time to time with no harm, but if there were no rules, we'd all be getting our cars fixed.


36 posted on 02/02/2007 1:46:18 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

I can't say I agree with you giving the state the right to come into MY family unit and take away my parenting rights.

Sure, it's been 'safe' for now --- but what long term studies have there been?

Fortunately, I've got a minimum of 5 years before I have to "opt-out" my oldest. (And, for now, unless something changes, I will).


37 posted on 02/02/2007 1:46:21 PM PST by Ro_Thunder ("Other than ending SLAVERY, FASCISM, NAZISM and COMMUNISM, war has never solved anything")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe
It hasn't been tested in boys, yet. Once it has been, I'm certain it will become mandatory for them as well.

Well, I'm not. And I'm wondering why make it mandatory anyway? HPV isn't a threat like measles or smallpox. If vaccination's such a great idea, then I think parents will go for it if it's right for their kid/s. And if they don't, the kid can get it when the kid's an adult. What's next, BTW? Mandatory anti-obesity meds, if they become available? I think making this mandatory is a rotten idea.

38 posted on 02/02/2007 1:46:27 PM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: passionfruit
I understand that this injection will probably save lives

So would an AIDS vaccine if it existed. But the only way somebody can get HIV or HPV is through sexual promiscuity. What Perry did today is NO DIFFERENT than signing a law requiring schoolkids to get vaccinated against AIDS.

This corporate whore Rick Perry (who claims he wants to be the Republican VP candidate in 2008 by the way) has essentially just stated that all Texas teenagers are sluts.

39 posted on 02/02/2007 1:46:30 PM PST by lqclamar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
That seems a bit harsh.

Do you really think that Perry's heart is pure and that he has the best interest of Texans in mind by signing this nonsense? Politicians by nature are whores.

40 posted on 02/02/2007 1:47:19 PM PST by jmc813 (Please check out www.marrow.org and consider becoming a donor. You may save a life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: YCTHouston

Boys get HPV infection in the form of genital warts and can spread it to females who in turn get cervical or oropharyngeal cancer. Boys and boys together (it happens even in Texas) can cause oropharyngeal and anal cancers.


41 posted on 02/02/2007 1:47:45 PM PST by CholeraJoe (Spork weasels ain't afraid of nuthin' but running out of sardines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
That's probably because boys can't get cervical cancer.

But they can get penile cancer from certain strains of HPV, IIRC. And they can certainly spread HPV.

42 posted on 02/02/2007 1:47:51 PM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
That's probably because boys can't get cervical cancer.

But they carry the virus. And if they're sexual profligates, will give it out liberally to every girl they shag. Trust me, it's only a matter of time before Nanny Perry mandates this for boys as well.
43 posted on 02/02/2007 1:48:25 PM PST by Antoninus ( Who is Duncan Hunter? Find out....www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr
Psst - HPV-types can also be transmitted through simple contact, not just sexual intercourse.

But honestly, do you really think the "simple contact" route is why an estimated 30-50% of sexually active females have HPV?
44 posted on 02/02/2007 1:50:18 PM PST by Antoninus ( Who is Duncan Hunter? Find out....www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Not until Merck completes the male testing and gets FDA approval, and that's well more than 5-7 years away.


45 posted on 02/02/2007 1:50:35 PM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

This isn't the first anti-cancer vaccine that has been made mandatory. Hepatitis B vaccine prevents liver cancer.


46 posted on 02/02/2007 1:50:36 PM PST by CholeraJoe (Spork weasels ain't afraid of nuthin' but running out of sardines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

Actually, some people see mandating a vaccine that is unneccesary as a usurpation of parental rights.


47 posted on 02/02/2007 1:50:42 PM PST by Malacoda (A day without a pi$$ed-off muslim is like a day without sunshine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
NJ mandates that every child attending school be given the Hepatitus vaccine (not sure which one)

A parent refused to vaccinate his child and not only was the child banned from the classroom but the school system moved to remove the child from the parents home.

This was a NJ freeper and goes back a few years ago. I do not know how this was resolved.

48 posted on 02/02/2007 1:50:57 PM PST by OldFriend (Swiftboating - Sinking a politician's Ship of Fools by Torpedoes of Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

I'm just making the point that girls would not get the virus unless they are having sex with boys.. so why not figure out how to nip it in the bud at the source first?


49 posted on 02/02/2007 1:50:57 PM PST by divine_moment_of_facts ("Listen to the sustain!" "I'm not hearing anything." "You would thought, if it were playing.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr
Psst - HPV-types can also be transmitted through simple contact, not just sexual intercourse.

You're wrong about that. Yes, there are many different HPV viruses spread by many means. There are STD-specific HPV viruses though, and they are the ones most likely to cause cancer.

50 posted on 02/02/2007 1:51:18 PM PST by lqclamar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 751-786 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson