Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blam

Unless I'm missing something, it seems as if this represents one group of early Americans, not necessarily the first.


9 posted on 02/02/2007 5:02:41 PM PST by From many - one.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: From many - one.; blam; SunkenCiv
From many - one. wrote: Unless I'm missing something, it seems as if this represents one group of early Americans, not necessarily the first.

And from the article fromwhich blam bolded the following sentence:

Comparing the DNA found in the tooth with that sampled from 3,500 Native Americans, researchers discovered that only one percent of modern tribal members have genetic patterns that matched the prehistoric sample.

You are not missing anything--you are correct, a point that the writer of the piece either did not understand or left out purposefully.

There were several peopling events that occurred in North and South America. This data shows one that happened 15k years ago--no more, no less.

And thanks for posting, blam, and thanks for the ping, SC.

36 posted on 02/03/2007 4:58:27 AM PST by Pharmboy ([She turned me into a] Newt! in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson