Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gay Couples To Get 'Certificates Of Inequality' (CA elected official to distribute documents)
Local 6 (Florida) ^ | February 3, 2007

Posted on 02/03/2007 3:45:18 PM PST by Stoat

Gay Couples To Get 'Certificates Of Inequality'

 

POSTED: 5:00 pm EST February 3, 2007

 

WOODLAND, Calif. -- The woman who oversees civil marriage in Yolo County, Calif., is planning to issue "certificate of inequality" to same-sex couples on Valentine's Day.

It's her way of protesting California's ban on gay marriage. They will say, "I issue this Certificate of Inequality to you because your choice of marriage partner displeases some people whose displeasure is, apparently, more important than principles of equality." The Sacramento Bee reported that Yolo County Clerk-Recorder Freddie Oakley said she designed the certificates because she is tired of denying marriage licenses to gays and lesbians.

"We don't discriminate against people on the basis of age, or health, or disability, or race, or ethnicity, or religion, but we do on the basis of gender in this matter," she told the paper. "I feel it's inappropriate." Some critics told the Bee that it was wrong of Oakley, an elected official, to distribute her certificates from a public building.

"The people pay government officials to implement the law and to faithfully execute the law," said Randy Thomasson, president of Campaign for Children and Families, which lobbies on social issues. "Not to ridicule the law and perform stunts that advocate the overthrow of marriage." But Oakley told the paper that turning same-sex couples away without marriage licenses makes her feel "like a good German, in the Third Reich, who enforced bad laws." After the message on the certificate is Oakley's name, title and words of encouragement to same-sex couples: "May the God of your choice bless you."



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ca; california; gaymarriage; homosexual; homosexualagenda; perverts; queers
Some critics told the Bee that it was wrong of Oakley, an elected official, to distribute her certificates from a public building.

Only "some" critics?  Last time I checked, it was the duty of elected officials to uphold the law, not to impugn or undermine it

1 posted on 02/03/2007 3:45:20 PM PST by Stoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Stoat
"Freddie"


2 posted on 02/03/2007 3:48:08 PM PST by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
"I issue this Certificate of Inequality to you because your choice of marriage partner displeases some people whose displeasure is, apparently, more important than principles of equality."

That's a pretty broad criteria this 'woman' has for marriage, none at all.
3 posted on 02/03/2007 3:52:10 PM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

all of this action using taxpayers money and government offices I suppose?


4 posted on 02/03/2007 3:53:51 PM PST by NY Attitude (You are responsible for your safety until the arrival of Law Enforcement Officers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi
Marriage is a ruse for homosexuals. It's all about getting recognition, freebies, and making their lifestyle more acceptable to the masses.

Nobody cares if two guys live together, just as long as they have to force us to recognize it by marriage.

5 posted on 02/03/2007 3:55:09 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Forgot your tagline? Click here to have it resent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing
"Freddie"

Oh lawd, if somebody had asked me to describe what I thought "Freddie" probably looked like without having seen 'her', I would have come up with something like that.

See what you've done....now I have to cleanse my neural pathways with imagery from the world of normalcy and sanity.

img204/337/claudiacardinale4ii.png

 

There, that's much better!

6 posted on 02/03/2007 3:56:17 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

The day after, she'll be handing out similar certificates to folks who believe they can make a silk purse from a sow's ear.


7 posted on 02/03/2007 3:56:19 PM PST by FormerLib (Sacrificing our land and our blood cannot buy protection from jihad.-Bishop Artemije of Kosovo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
Oakley said she designed the certificates because she is tired of denying marriage licenses to gays and lesbians

Or because she's a publicity-hungry lesbian herself?

8 posted on 02/03/2007 3:56:53 PM PST by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
OK, what's she gonna do when somebody shows up and wants to marry their horse, or their dog?

I mean, after all, if people can marry whomever they want, and it's their choice according to "the god of their choice," how can she say no?

9 posted on 02/03/2007 3:57:27 PM PST by AnAmericanMother ((Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

California used to be a great state. It is continuing its high-speed, downhill plummet into irrelevance at a rate faster than anyone could have predicted. Of course, California's socialist fruits and nuts are providing a extra foot on the accelerator of California's demise.


10 posted on 02/03/2007 3:59:03 PM PST by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Pretty good, but she's no Belly Girl. :)


11 posted on 02/03/2007 4:00:10 PM PST by golas1964 ("He tasks me... He tasks me, and I shall have him!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Should be called "Certificate of the Union of Fornication".

All this is well beyond her public role, and if there was justice in this world, she would be publicly fired if she did what she says she's going to do.


12 posted on 02/03/2007 4:00:38 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother; festus
OK, what's she gonna do when somebody shows up and wants to marry their horse, or their dog?

I mean, after all, if people can marry whomever they want, and it's their choice according to "the god of their choice," how can she say no?

Hopefully Festus will be there with his sixguns at the ready to prevent such an abomination.

 

img214/5999/festusandruthzd6.jpg

 

13 posted on 02/03/2007 4:06:04 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

It's her way of protesting California's ban on gay marriage. They will say, "I issue this Certificate of Inequality to you because your choice of marriage partner displeases some people whose displeasure is, apparently, more important than principles of equality."



Well then, I'd like to hand out "Certificates of Inequality of Opportunity" to inner-city kids condemned to bad schools because *some* people put the interests of teachers unions and bureaucracies ahead of the principle of equality of opportunity.


14 posted on 02/03/2007 4:07:32 PM PST by quesney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
Consider the problem this poses in the case of bisexuals. In order to "marry" both a man and a woman the trio will run into laws against bigamy. I think we've reached the point of reductio ad absurdam.

This Butch "official" needs to be booted out on her ample ass.

15 posted on 02/03/2007 4:11:16 PM PST by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
Some critics told the Bee that it was wrong of Oakley, an elected official, to distribute her certificates from a public building.

Well yeah, and my bet is that she's printing them up with public funds and supplies.

"May the God of your choice bless you."

Just so empty and clueless...
16 posted on 02/03/2007 4:12:24 PM PST by kenth (I wish compassionate conservatives were more compassionate to conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: golas1964
Pretty good, but she's no Belly Girl. :)

hmmm...you feel that Belly Girl outshines Claudia Cardinale in her youthful prime?

img143/5439/frenchshutupbellygirlsk5.jpg

 

 

Belly Girl's rational ideological convictions stand for an awful lot, but in terms of the ability to completely clear the neural pathways of "Freddy" imagery, I dunno.

How about Raquel?

img214/3926/raquelwelch6resizedcp9.jpg

17 posted on 02/03/2007 4:18:11 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
I want a 'Certificates Of Inequality' because of some tax advantages I no longer have because I just got married.....and I am filling out my income tax and my wife and I would have a big benefit if we just wouldn't have married.

Where's my 'Certificates Of Inequality'!!!!!

18 posted on 02/03/2007 4:18:53 PM PST by rface ("...the most schizoid freeper I've ever seen" - New Bloomfield, Missouri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
But Oakley told the paper that turning same-sex couples away without marriage licenses makes her feel "like a good German, in the Third Reich, who enforced bad laws."


19 posted on 02/03/2007 4:22:31 PM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
Asking as many here have for the billionth time, what right are these people being denied? A man can marry a woman and a woman can marry a man.

What if I came to city hall and demanded they do something wrong just because I want it. Sounds like she wants to open the city up to more lawsuits so eventually they'll have to give in.
20 posted on 02/03/2007 4:28:15 PM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult (The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi
"I issue this Certificate of Inequality to you because your choice of marriage partner displeases some people whose displeasure is, apparently, more important than principles of equality."

That's a pretty broad criteria this 'woman' has for marriage, none at all.

Yes, that appears to be part of the homosexual agenda...to remove any and all standards and definitions.  Apparently they think that destroying the rest of Society is the only way that they can live a happy life.

What breathtaking selfishness.

21 posted on 02/03/2007 4:31:59 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NY Attitude
all of this action using taxpayers money and government offices I suppose?

The article states that "she" is using Government offices and Government time to do this, and so I don't think that it's outlandish to assume that such an ignorant activist would shy away from using other Government supplies, equipment and facilities to produce these 'certificates' since "she" apparently believes that "her" opinion has more value than the Law.

The fact that someone like this has not been assassinated is voluminous proof of what an incredibly tolerant Nation we are.  How long would somebody like this last if "she" were to try this in, say, Cuba?

 

22 posted on 02/03/2007 4:38:24 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib
The day after, she'll be handing out similar certificates to folks who believe they can make a silk purse from a sow's ear.

The mind reels at thoughts of what "she" might consider appropriate for humans vis-a-vis sows and other livestock...

 

((((shudder)))))

23 posted on 02/03/2007 4:45:10 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: hsalaw
Oakley said she designed the certificates because she is tired of denying marriage licenses to gays and lesbians

Or because she's a publicity-hungry lesbian herself?

And one who has a visceral, seething hatred for the Society that handed her a high-paying job and a position of authority and trust.

24 posted on 02/03/2007 4:48:08 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing
There's one: fat, glasses, square jaw and a dog-chewed-on-it haircut....

New Mexico is loaded with women like that. I hate 'em.

25 posted on 02/03/2007 4:49:30 PM PST by Cogadh na Sith (There's an open road from the cradle to the tomb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
Hypothetical question, Could the recipients of this document construe that these documents issued by a California Official from a California Government building be deemed as authoritative proof of discrimination against gays and lesbians? If so, I could imagine a lot of law suits.
26 posted on 02/03/2007 4:51:09 PM PST by NY Attitude (You are responsible for your safety until the arrival of Law Enforcement Officers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment
California used to be a great state. It is continuing its high-speed, downhill plummet into irrelevance at a rate faster than anyone could have predicted. Of course, California's socialist fruits and nuts are providing a extra foot on the accelerator of California's demise.

Hopefully our Prayers for the well-being of our great Nation will give strength to the beleaguered sane majority there, so that they might reclaim the honor of their State.

img93/1042/thanksgivingao8.jpg

27 posted on 02/03/2007 4:53:39 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

good for her... It's about time someone explained the facts of life to these folks.


28 posted on 02/03/2007 5:07:25 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NY Attitude
Hypothetical question, Could the recipients of this document construe that these documents issued by a California Official from a California Government building be deemed as authoritative proof of discrimination against gays and lesbians? If so, I could imagine a lot of law suits.

shhh!  You'll give ideas to the ACLU trolls and lurkers  :-)

This is precisely why such activities as this have been historically verboten and elected officials have been expected to uphold the Law, ever since the invention of Law.

Oh well, the courts in California have plenty of time on their hands and don't have any other issues that are more relevant to the maintenance of the protection of the public I suppose (effort at sarcasm)

29 posted on 02/03/2007 5:18:09 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Why is she able to do this?


30 posted on 02/03/2007 5:23:31 PM PST by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle
Should be called "Certificate of the Union of Fornication".

Agreed in principle, although I might suggest that this would insult fornicators.

All this is well beyond her public role, and if there was justice in this world, she would be publicly fired if she did what she says she's going to do.

As well as being required to repay every dime of salary that "she" has ever been paid by the State in "her" current position, as penance for this violence that "she" intends to inflict upon those who placed their trust in "her".

31 posted on 02/03/2007 5:23:42 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
Why is she able to do this?

Because homosexuals have their own special set of rights, without the attendant responsibilities that the healthy members of the public have.

Any effort to apply basic legal standards to "her" behaviors will be met by thousands of bussed-in and well-compensated shrill homosexual marching activists who will anoint and deify "Freddie" as their latest cause celebre.

They will vandalize and burn the community to the ground unless any local officials who dared object recant their statements and make yet another exception in the Law..

32 posted on 02/03/2007 5:32:31 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

33 posted on 02/03/2007 5:37:13 PM PST by Gritty (Those who want their faith to dictate what the government does are un-American - Senator Schumer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quesney
It's her way of protesting California's ban on gay marriage. They will say, "I issue this Certificate of Inequality to you because your choice of marriage partner displeases some people whose displeasure is, apparently, more important than principles of equality."



Well then, I'd like to hand out "Certificates of Inequality of Opportunity" to inner-city kids condemned to bad schools because *some* people put the interests of teachers unions and bureaucracies ahead of the principle of equality of opportunity.

The only problem here is that you are using logic, reason, and solid, clear, rational thinking in an arena that involves the Left.  Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that in a historical context most all victories against the Left have involved vanquishing them with overwhelming military might.

(wishful thinking....."sigh")

34 posted on 02/03/2007 5:50:53 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Bernard Marx
Consider the problem this poses in the case of bisexuals. In order to "marry" both a man and a woman the trio will run into laws against bigamy. I think we've reached the point of reductio ad absurdam.

This Butch "official" needs to be booted out on her ample ass.

Agreed, and I'll wager that if we set up a lottery, the winner being able to boot "her" out using whatever level of force the winner deems appropriate, that we would have a run on tickets that would rival the eager Saddam hangman wannabees.

35 posted on 02/03/2007 5:55:43 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: scripter; DBeers; little jeremiah; wagglebee
Activist homosexual abusing an elected office as well as the public's trust ping

 

img224/7267/gayvilleiy1.jpg

36 posted on 02/03/2007 8:12:14 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Givin the one eyed stare...........

Back in the '30s the Mayors of at least one and possibly more CA city sent their police to the CA state border and began forcibly turning back people from other US states trying to move to CA. (This is true BTW)

Call Marshall Dillion. Maybe its time to do that in reverse. We could seal the borders of CA and keep anyone from getting out.


37 posted on 02/04/2007 6:48:55 AM PST by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult
Asking as many here have for the billionth time, what right are these people being denied? A man can marry a woman and a woman can marry a man.

The right to formally marry their farm animals I do believe.

And if you argue that its not true that only gays are prevented from marrying beasts of burden then explain Bill Clinton's marriage to me ;-)
38 posted on 02/04/2007 6:51:05 AM PST by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: festus
Back in the '30s the Mayors of at least one and possibly more CA city sent their police to the CA state border and began forcibly turning back people from other US states trying to move to CA. (This is true BTW)

I hadn't heard about that before.  That was in a different era, when concepts such as States' rights were in vogue and political correctness hadn't been invented yet.  This was before the ACLU and other hysterical leftists and Commies masquerading as 'compassionate' people started strangling America to death..   "sigh"

Call Marshall Dillion. Maybe its time to do that in reverse. We could seal the borders of CA and keep anyone from getting out.

Sealing San Francisco would be a good first step.  It could be done on the grounds of a public health quarantine.

I'm very happy that we have you as FR's Deputy Sherriff, Festus!

You, Marshall Dillon and a good posse could do far more for sealing America's borders than the Feds have been able to up to this point, I'll wager.

39 posted on 02/04/2007 9:36:25 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
Back in the '30s the Mayors of at least one and possibly more CA city sent their police to the CA state border and began forcibly turning back people from other US states trying to move to CA. (This is true BTW)

I hadn't heard about that before. That was in a different era, when concepts such as States' rights were in vogue and political correctness hadn't been invented yet. This was before the ACLU and other hysterical leftists and Commies masquerading as 'compassionate' people started strangling America to death.. "sigh"


To the comments I made on the great depression. I dug out my book by T.H. Watkins ( not exactly a conservative author ) to find the bit about CA and the border.

When the dustbowl hit large numbers of american citizens began migrating to CA because it was more prosperous and also had a better welfare system. A lot of them headed to LA and it was the LAPD Chief, James E. Davis, who in Feb of '36 sent 125 LAPD members to the borders of AZ and OR to keep out the transients. This border area was 800 miles long give or take.

But I found another gem about how the LA, Chicago and Detroit cities were having large illegal immigration problems as well at the time. The feds solved it by starting large scale deportations. The reason was to save $$ on the state treasuries due to welfare and other relief work. The fact that they mostly all came back was laughed about in the day as giving them all a state paid vacation back home for the holidays. ;-) The first set shipped out in '31.
40 posted on 02/05/2007 6:55:02 AM PST by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: festus

Wow, I see that these problems have been with us for a very long time, in varying degrees.

Hopefully the Feds will put Marshall Dillon in charge ( or at least Sheriff Joe Arpaio) and with you as Deputy with a handpicked posse, y'all could accomplish far more than these massive, top-heavy Federal programs have been able to.


41 posted on 02/06/2007 6:33:59 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

The Independent on Sunday published a short article about Gibraltar's "Stay Behind" Cave. The piece, written by Anne Penketh, made reference to the fact that 92 year old Dr Bruce Cooper has broken his silence about this top secret WW2 mission. The article also mentioned that researchers had met and interviewed Dr Cooper.

Unfortunately Ms Penketh's original piece was heavily edited by the Independent on Sunday which did nothing more than provide an account of what was already known ten years ago. The edited peice completely failed to cover the following three elements;

1. Dr Coopers description of the secret chamber that he was taken to in 1942 is in some aspects different to the layout of "Stay Behind Cave". This is now fuelling existing rumours that a second secret chamber is yet to be discovered. I have a sketch of such a chamber in my research files, it originated from an MI6 source. Further information has come from a former GCHQ telegraphist which suggests that tandem Operation Tracer units operated during the Suez crisis, so this may also have been the case in Gibraltar.

2. On several occasions during the past month a specialist team has been searching the Upper Rock area of Gibraltar for evidence of a second chamber and two areas are of interest within MOD property.

3. Discussions are currently taking place in the hope of bringing Dr Cooper to Gibraltar to reunite him with "Stay Behind" Cave or to possibly identify the whereabouts of a
second secret chamber.

I am actually one of the researchers who interviewed Dr Cooper on behalf of the discovergibraltar.com website. A substantial amount of information has been added to the
website which includes MP3 audio clips of Dr Cooper talking, also photographs of him in 1942 as well as photographs taken of him at the meeting. The section also includes up to date information about Operation Tracer and photographs of Stay Behind Cave taken at the beginning of January 2007.

http://discovergibraltar.com


42 posted on 02/07/2007 5:38:28 PM PST by jimcrone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: jimcrone
Thank you very much; it's all quite interesting and sincerely appreciated.

I'm wondering, however, if there might be a chance that you had intended to post in this thread instead:

Secret plan to bury soldiers alive inside Rock of Gibraltar (WW2 plan if Rock captured)

If so, perhaps it might be helpful to other readers if you were to re-post your information in that thread, so that people interested in this topic might be more likely to find it?

Thanks again   :-)

43 posted on 02/08/2007 12:32:11 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson