Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ford Five Hundred to be renamed Taurus
LeftLane News ^ | 6 Feb 2007 | Unknown

Posted on 02/06/2007 7:34:06 AM PST by Spktyr

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-214 last
To: Vaquero
Woah....never better....never. Vipers DO rule.

Motor Trend favored the Viper in 2005 and the Corvette in 2006. (They even put the Shelby Mustang above the Viper, although I don't think that's a fair comparison.)

201 posted on 02/07/2007 6:32:12 AM PST by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

We all can afford a Viper. They are only $175 thousand dollars if you can find one.

If automakers would put the same imagination into the average auto they might have something at a reasonable cost. Wasting time and money on rich toy production lines is definitely contributing to a loss of focus on the bread and butter assembly line.


202 posted on 02/07/2007 7:33:07 AM PST by o_zarkman44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

Motor Trend shills for GM...most of the car rags do.
try this....



if your looking for power seats and other such truck, we are not talking about the same reasons to want one.


203 posted on 02/07/2007 7:43:56 AM PST by Vaquero (time again for the Crusades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

Do you actually think that a group of radical, black, union workers in 1969 was representative of workers at an auto plant, considering that they were attacking other union members for opposing them.
The article from 1972 seemed to be very much in the same vein as the 69 story. Radicals were loose in our society and hell bent on destroying anything they could get their hands on. Those in the UAW were weeded out by both the auto companies and the union.
Do you have something more current than the era of bell bottoms?


204 posted on 02/07/2007 8:36:10 AM PST by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: em2vn

Of UAW violence and thuggery? Sure!

2001, the tradition continues:

http://www.winchesterstar.com/TheWinchesterStar/010713/Area_abex.asp

http://www.nrtw.org/foundation-action/fa_47.htm

And in *1954*, which wasn't an era of radicals being loose:

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,864133-1,00.html

More union violence, in 1999 and other times:

http://www.nilrr.org/unviol2000.htm

2000 court papers - same thing from the UAW:

http://www.nlrb.gov/nlrb/shared_files/decisions/341/341-118.htm

1943 - UAW workers sabotage aircraft needed for war effort:

http://www.crompton.com/nadc/Documents/Brewster_article_July15-2001.html

Generic Union Violence:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Violence_in_industrial_disputes

"1983 - Eddie York was murdered for crossing a United Mine Workers (UMW) picket line."

Plenty of material on this site: http://www.geocities.com/Cordobakaf/

Another good one: http://www.soldiersofsolidarity.com/






Unions need to go away. Now.


205 posted on 02/07/2007 9:02:21 AM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

The lives of scabs should not be easy, nor should they expect them to be. They are close to the lowest form of humans in the western world.
I don't think they should suffer harm but harrassmemt is a fair ploy to be used. A person who won't support fellow union memembers who are on strike or will cross a picket line as a replacement worker is worse that the pus from an infected sore.


206 posted on 02/07/2007 9:33:05 AM PST by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: em2vn

Verbal harassment is fine, free speech being what it is.

Harassment in the form of property damage or violence, which is what unions *always* use? No - or are you advocating such?

I used to be a Teamsters member. Then I wised up, left the union and got a better job elsewhere - without a union.

I can only assume that you are a union member. If so, it may behoove you to look into where your union dues are going. The answer should surprise you.


207 posted on 02/07/2007 10:59:44 AM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

I drove a 4-cyl auto-trans Contour rental back in '96. No wonder it didn't sell - the Ford Escort (restyled Mazda 323) of the same model year was just as big (possibly bigger) and nearly as powerful, and cost a lot less. The Contour had a buzzy engine and was just OK, at best.


208 posted on 02/07/2007 12:02:19 PM PST by -YYZ-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: taildragger

Doesn't look that much different than the current model. Then again, I thought the current model looked fine, too. Still don't like the over-styled "chrome" grille, though - and the same comment went for the new Jetta when it came out, and several of Nissan's models, including the Murano. In any case, it's a large, conservatively-styled care. Just the sort of thing that all those Crown Vic lovers out there should go for (they certainly weren't driving them for the thrilling driving experience, RWD or no).


209 posted on 02/07/2007 12:14:32 PM PST by -YYZ-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

"and the GTO will soon be back"

Maybe they can do something about the styling, this time. The last one looked just like a Pontiac Grand Prix - which is to say, not unattractive, but also not in any way distinctive from several other Pontiacs, with too much plastic cladding.


210 posted on 02/07/2007 12:17:40 PM PST by -YYZ-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

So, what were the shortcomings of the Freestar that you drove?


211 posted on 02/07/2007 12:25:29 PM PST by -YYZ-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: -YYZ-

Well, the Contour was the Mondeo *chassis*, but watered/dumbed down for the US market. None of the stuff that made the first Mondeo popular was on it.


212 posted on 02/07/2007 2:12:50 PM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

Interesting thing about the Falcon is that it's development costs were like Ford US's stationery budget. The guys at GM Holden and Ford Australia when it comes to RWD platforms, are reknowned for doing a lot with a small budget. They lack the army of paper pushers that detroit employ.

The new Camaro is being designed in Australia for this reason and Ford are waking up to this resource too. The next Falcon is apparently destined for great things...


213 posted on 02/21/2007 4:06:58 AM PST by Dave Elias
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

If Ford goes Green and Dem; they could introduce a very "PC" cross-over platform....
The BroncoBama.


214 posted on 02/23/2007 11:54:15 PM PST by PizzaDriver (an heinleinian/libertarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-214 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson