Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PC World: Top 10 Internet Scandals of All Time (Free Republic & Rathergate)
via MSNBC ^ | 6 FEB 2007 | Dan Tynan, PC World

Posted on 02/06/2007 4:37:21 PM PST by Polybius

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 last
To: All; nutmeg

.

DAVID SHAW: RATHER's work 'Shoddy, Slipshod'...not LIBERAL..?

http://www.Freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1227809/posts

.


101 posted on 02/08/2007 8:34:08 PM PST by ALOHA RONNIE ("ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer/Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.lzxray.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: pyx

"Dan Rather Bids a Font Farewell"

Well Dan.......uh....font you!


102 posted on 02/08/2007 8:38:02 PM PST by stephenjohnbanker (Our troops will send all of the worlds terrorists to hell in a handbasket with no virgins!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Polybius
Free Republic and Rathergate make it to Number 3 in the Top 10 Internet Scandals of All Time as ranked by PC World

The whole premise of the article regarding the exposure by certain online sources of Rather's and CBS's attempted use of forged documents to influence a Presidential election is a lie. It was not an "internet scandal" at all - it was a "broadcast network news scandal". THEY are the ones who lied, and got caught. They OWN the scandal.

103 posted on 02/08/2007 8:49:59 PM PST by tarheelswamprat (So what if I'm not rich? So what if I'm not one of the beautiful people? At least I'm not smart...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

HEAR HEAR


104 posted on 02/08/2007 9:35:31 PM PST by do the dhue (DEM ARE RATS!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: tarheelswamprat
The whole premise of the article regarding the exposure by certain online sources of Rather's and CBS's attempted use of forged documents to influence a Presidential election is a lie. It was not an "internet scandal" at all - it was a "broadcast network news scandal". THEY are the ones who lied, and got caught. They OWN the scandal.

The article is not about scandals OF the Internet.

It is about "the Net's ability to expose scoundrels, scalawags, liars, cheats, and fools--and then broadcast the scandal to a billion glowing screens".

It is about the power of the Internet to break the so-called "Mainstream Media's" previous information distribution monopoly. It is about the Internet's power to not only expose information that the MSM would previously have kept hidden but to expose even the scoundrels, scalawags, liars, cheats, and fools of the MSM itself.

In the case of Rather-gate:

"But shortly after 60 Minutes host Dan Rather revealed the documents' existence in September 2004, the gun blew up in his face. Conservative blogs Free Republic, Little Green Footballs, and Power Line questioned the authenticity of the documents--specifically, whether a 1970s-era typewriter could produce the superscript th and curly apostrophes found in the four memos .............. A few months later, he quietly left CBS--with the inevitable "gate" permanently appended to his name."

Thus, the Number One scandal was:

"1. Monica-gate and Whitewater ........ On January 17, 1998, Matt Drudge broke the news that White House intern Monica Lewinsky was having an affair with President Bill Clinton. The story appeared on his Web site, the Drudge Report, and quickly turned into one of the biggest scandals in our nation's history--and established the Internet as a news source to be reckoned with."

Before the Internet, there was so-called "Freedom of the Press" but that actually meant "Freedom of the Press Editors Only".

If the Press did not want the American People to know about something, they kept it hidden and ten thousand citizens writing one hundred thousand letters to the editor did not have the power of the arrogant editors who decided what the American People would be allowed to know and thereby exerted political power though the uninformed and misinformed electoral mass.

The Internet plus a Forum such as Free Republic allows somebody at home in his pajamas to put out information to America and the World that can bring down the credibility of CBS.

The article is about the dawn of the era of "Freedom of the People's Say" and the end of the era of "Freedom of the Press Editor Only".

105 posted on 02/09/2007 7:33:33 AM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Kermit the Frog Does theWatusi; Polybius

Dan Rather - the gift that keeps giving.

We still need to design those honorary Rathergate pajamas.

106 posted on 02/09/2007 11:42:33 AM PST by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Poor ol' Dan. He really thought he was going to bring down the President with this nonsense - I bet he cries about it today every time he thinks about it.........


107 posted on 02/12/2007 8:10:35 PM PST by greccogirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dalight
The soft underbelly of the conservative movement is that it has no mechanism to deal with the double standard of the left and no stomach to make the left live by the same rules. We just shrug it off and decide thats how the game is played.


its time for conservatives to "MAN UP" or walk into Whigdom

108 posted on 02/13/2007 11:39:25 AM PST by Nat Turner (DO NOT TRY THIS AT HOME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: radiohead
Yep! I've told friends that one day our grandchildren will be reading about how FReepers and bloggers brought down an entrenched member of the media establishment.

too bad FR doesn't have a torphy gallery. We could stick Rather's and Kerrey's heads in it. i'm sure we could add more.

109 posted on 02/13/2007 11:55:06 AM PST by Centurion2000 (If you're not being shot at, it's not a high stress job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
Anyone remember "Deep in the Heurtgen Forrest?" LOL

hehe.

110 posted on 02/16/2007 11:48:24 AM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MarkL
Nope, they just say, "nobody concentrated on the charges, but on the fonts."

Except that we did. Lt. Bush wasn't due to have the physical until his birth month.

111 posted on 02/16/2007 11:55:39 AM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ
FR didn't focus on where George W. Bush was because we KNEW where he was at that time, and they knew that the National Guard knew where he was, because he'd received permission to do his NG duties at a different post. So since we already KNEW that, we focused on the fraud being perpetrated by CBS, as it was the more important story.

That's a different fraudulent scandal. Rathergate was about whether he was ordered to show up to a physical, whether a *retired* general was putting pressure on a LTC that it turns out liked Lt. Bush.

112 posted on 02/16/2007 11:59:08 AM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson