Wow, I think I'm off the band wagon already. I was looking at the WOT stance and NYC's turnaround under his leadership and starting to come around to the guy. Amazing what a little light shining can illuminate. I'm back to my original thinking that we'd be almost no better off with Giuliani than with whatever democrat wins.
I will say that I think America could survive Giuliani, but not Hillary.
Rudy, for any flaws he may have, seems to have a genuine love for America. I don't think Hillary does. Or Obama-osama.
Which is exactly correct, which is exactly why the MSM is trying desperately to annoint Giuliani as the Republican candidate.
If Hillary! wins, they get a liberal Democrat. If Rudy wins, they get a liberal Democrat who calls himself a Republican.
Don't fall for the rigged game.
"I'm back to my original thinking that we'd be almost no better off with Giuliani than with whatever democrat wins."
That may be the wisest thinking.
I remember Giuliani from his days as mayor, and how he broke the mob, reduced crime and stood up to the race fascists like Sharpton, et al. Plus, after 9/11 he was magnificent.
BUT, as ardent a Pro-Lifer as I am, and almost that with the 2nd Amendment, I do see SOME logic to the "hold your nose and vote Rudy, he's the only one that can stop Hitliary" argument.
But, would a Rudy term bring MORE liberal destruction of our country than would a Hitliary term would, where all could SEE with their own eyes her vicious, hateful destruction of the constitution and resist it?
I think California would have been better off had Grey Davis been retained, and a Tom McClintock been elected later, than the absolute destruction of the Cali GOP and any hint of restraint whatsoever, is the same thing true for Hitliary and Giuliani?
I'm torn, and cannot really see the right thing to do.
Ed