Skip to comments.
Iran says tests missiles able to sink "big warships"
reuters ^
| Feb 8, 2007
| Reuters
Posted on 02/08/2007 3:20:03 AM PST by Flavius
EHRAN (Reuters) - Iran's Revolutionary Guards test fired missiles in wargames on Thursday which a commander said could sink "big warships" in the Gulf, Sea of Oman and the north of the Indian Ocean, the state broadcaster said.
Iran is at loggerheads with the United States over its disputed nuclear program and what Washington calls its meddling in Iraq. The United States has ordered a second aircraft carrier to the Gulf to step up pressure on Iran.
"These missiles, with a maximum range of 350 km (220 miles), can hit different kinds of big warships in all of the Persian Gulf, all of the Sea of Oman and the north of the Indian Ocean," senior Revolutionary Guards naval commander Ali Fadavi said.
Fadavi was also quoted by the state broadcaster's Web site as saying that the warhead of this missile had the capacity to sink "all kinds of big warships".
State television reported that the missile tests, staged on the second day of wargames by the Guards' naval and air units, were "to show that Iran is able to confront any possible threats."
Washington accuses the Iran of seeking to develop atomic weapons, a charge Iran denies. Tehran also dismisses allegations that it is backing militants in Iraq.
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iran
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
1
posted on
02/08/2007 3:20:06 AM PST
by
Flavius
To: Flavius
Fadavi was also quoted by the state broadcaster's Web site as saying that the warhead of this missile had the capacity to sink "all kinds of big warships". At least that's what the Russian salesman told him!
2
posted on
02/08/2007 3:22:38 AM PST
by
airborne
(Elect an Airborne Ranger,Vietnam Veteran for President ! Duncan Hunter 2008!!)
To: Flavius
Oh what BS these Iranians can come up with.
3
posted on
02/08/2007 3:26:38 AM PST
by
tobyhill
(The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
To: airborne
"..Web site as saying that the warhead of this missile had the capacity to sink "all kinds of big warships"."
As long as they'll fit in the bath tub of course. They haven't quite worked out the severe bathtub shortage issue though.
To: Flavius
Here's the problem with that logic.
You may be able to sink big warships with your Russian made missiles.
The big question is can you sink them all at once?
And please remember my good friend, lots of our big warships don't travel on the surface.
5
posted on
02/08/2007 3:29:16 AM PST
by
SomeoneNeedsToSayIt
(Socialism: If we ALL can’t be wealthy… we ALL will be poor…)
To: Flavius
"Big Warships" Like this one?
6
posted on
02/08/2007 3:31:09 AM PST
by
Niteranger68
(Point your toilets towards Mecca!)
To: airborne
At least that's what the Russian salesman told him!
He made the same claim back in the '60's. I believe it was the Styx (SS-N-2) missile that was promised to make aircraft carriers obsolete. By 1970, Styx was obsolete.
7
posted on
02/08/2007 3:32:19 AM PST
by
Thrownatbirth
(.....when the sidewalks are safe for the little guy.)
To: Flavius
There are a couple of carrier groups in the Persian Gulf for them to practice on.
The US Navy has a lot of balls to be cruising around in that little pond begging Iran to take their best shots.
8
posted on
02/08/2007 3:35:54 AM PST
by
Jeff Gordon
(History convinces me that bad government results from too much government. - Thomas Jefferson)
To: Flavius
Whom do you think they're playing to? The LSM media?
The relatively tiny Stark did not sink when sucker punched by Iraq. I doubt they can land a lethal blow to a U.S. carrier. If they try real hard they may sink one or two smaller U.S. ships, but at enormous cost, in terms of reprisals.
One thing is certain, if they fire on a U.S. ship, their nuclear weapons program is soooo over.
9
posted on
02/08/2007 3:46:42 AM PST
by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(When I search out the massed wheeling circles of the stars, my feet no longer touch the earth)
To: Jeff Gordon
The US Navy has a lot of balls to be cruising around in that little pond
You build and weaponize these ships precisely to do that. You have to sail into harm's way.
10
posted on
02/08/2007 4:00:51 AM PST
by
Thrownatbirth
(.....when the sidewalks are safe for the little guy.)
To: Flavius
I'm waiting for the article that says "US testing missiles that will sink small countries."
11
posted on
02/08/2007 4:05:28 AM PST
by
usmcobra
(I sing Karaoke the way it was meant to be sung, drunk, badly and in Japanese)
To: Flavius
They might be able to sink big ones, but they'll *not* likely sink ours. Our US Navy is more ready than in the past. It's good to see that they're so focused on what's in front of them, though. [s]
If Iran fires, her leaders' fantasies of power will evaporate overnight. The whole problem will be solved very quickly and with very few US and civilian casualties. We'll hear about it when it's virtually over.
12
posted on
02/08/2007 4:14:37 AM PST
by
familyop
To: Flavius
Iran says tests missiles able to sink "big warships"
US Navy says, "Go Ahead, Make Our Day".
To: Thrownatbirth
By the time it became obsolete,the Styx had sunk more than a few enemy ships & attacked targets on land as well.
To: philman_36
Incoming, R2! Take it out!
(whistle squeak pop... brrrrrrrrrrrrapppp.)
15
posted on
02/08/2007 4:29:42 AM PST
by
SlowBoat407
(A living insult to islam since 1959)
To: Flavius
The trap is baited.
We await 28 years of payback.
BUMP
16
posted on
02/08/2007 4:36:07 AM PST
by
capitalist229
(Get Democrats out of our pockets and Republicans out of our bedrooms.)
To: usmcobra
17
posted on
02/08/2007 4:39:16 AM PST
by
snowrip
(Liberal? YOU HAVE NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT. Actually, you lack even a legitimate excuse.)
To: Flavius
We should fire a couple of missles over Iran as a ditto.
To: sukhoi-30mki
By the time it became obsolete,the Styx had sunk more than a few enemy ships & attacked targets on land as well.
Yep. The Israelis paid dearly in '67, but the USN already had countermeasures in place, even on the smaller DDs and DEs. When I became an EW in '72, Styx was a no-brainer; there was a whole new generation of guidance systems to worry about.
19
posted on
02/08/2007 4:39:59 AM PST
by
Thrownatbirth
(.....when the sidewalks are safe for the little guy.)
To: SlowBoat407
"R2D2 with a hard on" says..."I fart in your general direction."
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson