Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Snipers in Iraq
WashTimes ^ | 10 FEB 2007 | Bill Gertz and Rowan Scarborough

Posted on 02/10/2007 5:23:46 AM PST by radar101

U.S. intelligence agencies have built their own version of the famous Russian-designed AK-47 assault rifle for use by American snipers in Iraq. The snipers are firing at one form of deadly insurgent and terrorist attack, the so-called "spray and pray" method used by those who try to sow terror by emerging from hiding and firing a machine gun randomly into crowds. The special U.S. snipers have used .50-caliber long-range rifles for killing terrorists. Now, they are using the modified AK-47s to kill insurgents without a normal shot to the head. Instead, snipers are killing insurgents with shots to the heart, and creating dissension and doubt in the groups over who is behind the sniping. The 7.62 mm round used by the AK-47 differs from the 7.62 mm sniper round used in normal U.S. sniper ammunition and creates a different wound.

(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: War on Terror
KEYWORDS: banglist; oneshotonekill; sharpshooting; snipers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: SamuraiScot
Duh...Im talking about what advantage in telling the terrorists its us doing it?

The idea would be for them to not know its us.

21 posted on 02/10/2007 6:03:52 AM PST by DainBramage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: radar101

I skimmed through the story but it seems to me that it is unlikely that U.S. troops would use AK-47's for sniper rifles. These rifles are not accurate and are intermediate range. The U.S military bringing back the M14 for what I think are called "designated marksmen." An M14 can be quite accurate fired semi-auto and can be effective long range (600 yards or so). The author must be confused because the AK-47 uses a 7.62 x 39 mm round while the M14 uses the much more powerful 7.62 x 51 NATO round. The author must have heard "7.62" and made the wrong assumption. Do journalists do fact checking at all beyond reading the latest release from the DNC?


22 posted on 02/10/2007 6:05:30 AM PST by Wilhelm Tell (True or False? This is not a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamuraiScot

The idea presented in this article is that its other terrorists doing it.


23 posted on 02/10/2007 6:06:00 AM PST by DainBramage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Kozak
I guess it's possible, but that some illiterate, uneducated Iranian peasant can tell a wound difference between a 7.62x54, and a 7.62x51 Nato bullet seems unlikely to me.

Although at least the story would start to make some sense then. Our guys take up the using Dragunov rifles to throw the enemies off in terms of report similarity and wound characteristics, and how this guy describes it is we've taken up using a custom built AK47 and some nonsense about firing machine guns into crowds.

That sounds like a member of the MSM talking about guns.

24 posted on 02/10/2007 6:10:05 AM PST by tcostell (MOLON LABE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: radar101

I'm not sure that the info Gertz has provided is going help insurgents. They don't read the Washing Times and, frankly, even if they know about this tactic, the tactic itself still works.


If you click the link to read the whole story I think the more important part of the article (which is really a series of small articles) concerns the ROE in Iraq. Here is an excerpt...

"Overlawyering:

When the history of the war on terrorism is written one day, historians no doubt will credit risk-averse lawyers with making the war longer.
Legal restrictions are hampering soldiers from defending themselves in the streets of Baghdad and are limiting the effectiveness of secret operations by special operations forces and intelligence personnel, defense officials say.
One Special Forces commando stated that the lawyers are risking lives in Iraq because of confusing written rules on when troops can fire weapons in "Escalation of Force" cases, that is, combat against insurgents and al Qaeda terrorists.
"Escalation of force is ridiculous over there," the commando said. "If an EOF occurs and a weapon is fired, it is to be reported so 'a 15-6 investigation' can be initiated."
An Army Regulation 15-6 investigation requires a commanding officer to gather evidence, interview witnesses and write a report every time a weapon is fired, a time-consuming and useless bureaucratic exercise in a war zone where numerous firefights take place almost every day."


THAT, in my mind, is a far more important issue and one the Pentagon needs to address.


25 posted on 02/10/2007 6:15:05 AM PST by navyguy (We don't need more youth. What we need is a fountain of SMART.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

They ought to be using the 416 Barrett round for sniping.

check it out:

http://airbornecombatengineer.typepad.com/airborne_combat_engineer/2006/02/barretts_propri.html


26 posted on 02/10/2007 6:18:38 AM PST by Kolb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

There has been some discussion about opening a season on liberals. Does anyone have the dates?


27 posted on 02/10/2007 6:18:50 AM PST by Neoliberalnot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcostell; All
When we tell the world we are using AK-47 to snipe then we open ourselves to blame for every AK wound in the country.

Any innocent civilian shot in cross fire could be our fault.

I don't mind the idea but to announce it to the world seems irresponsible at least.

28 posted on 02/10/2007 6:19:34 AM PST by DainBramage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: radar101

FEAR FIGHT!


29 posted on 02/10/2007 6:24:57 AM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kolb

I thought the same thing. I saw a demonstration on "Future Weapons" and was blown away.


30 posted on 02/10/2007 6:32:54 AM PST by nitzy (America is a nation not an economy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: radar101
U.S. intelligence agencies have built their own version of the famous Russian-designed AK-47 assault rifle for use by American snipers in Iraq.
They'd have to, as the AK-47 ain't no sniper rifle. The beauty of the AK-47 is its reliability of firing even if dirty as hell and dropped in mud. All because the tolerances are so loose -- but therefore 'a tad' inaccurate.

The 7.62 mm round used by the AK-47 differs from the 7.62 mm sniper round used in normal U.S. sniper ammunition and creates a different wound.

Well sorry but .. DUH!
The AK in question fires a 7.62x39mm and a U.S. 'sniper round' is a 7.62x51mm (NATO), aka .308 Winchester (but its really not the same). But unless they're completely rebuilding this new super duper AK from the ground up (receiver, longer barrel, etc) I question the veracity of this.

To me a modified SKS makes more sense (we know how the MSM calls everything an AK-47). It still fires the 7.62x39, has a longer barrel (20" vs 16") and when you put a scope and new stock on it and wham - instant 'sniper rifle'. Though with the 7.62x39 still not much good past 200 yards (Remington Ballistics charts STOP at 200 for the 7.62x39)

31 posted on 02/10/2007 6:36:29 AM PST by Condor51 (Where's Attila The Hun when you need him? [Go sit down Rudy])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: navyguy

--ditto--


32 posted on 02/10/2007 6:45:52 AM PST by rellimpank (-don't believe anything the MSM states about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: DainBramage
No insult was intended; for any misperception, I apologize. However, I do know this isn't a shock to al-Queda, except in the worst way.
33 posted on 02/10/2007 6:59:30 AM PST by GAB-1955 (being dragged, kicking and screaming, into the Kingdom of Heaven....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: wgflyer

No, I read Pyle's story on the A-51 in his book, "Brave Men," published during the war.


34 posted on 02/10/2007 7:00:57 AM PST by GAB-1955 (being dragged, kicking and screaming, into the Kingdom of Heaven....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: radar101
7.62x39 will never be an effective sniper rifle. It's flight ballistics won't allow for it. It's not going to be accurate for the alleged heart shot beyond probably 125 yards. It's leaving the muzzle at around 2300 feet per second. Think 30-30 ballistics to for comparison.
35 posted on 02/10/2007 7:03:46 AM PST by elhombrelibre (Hagel, Obama, Voinovich and Biden making the world safe for Iranian terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kozak
That would at least make some sense, but why then the heart shots?
36 posted on 02/10/2007 7:05:00 AM PST by elhombrelibre (Hagel, Obama, Voinovich and Biden making the world safe for Iranian terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MaDeuce
This isn't news to anybody in Iraq - both bad guys and good guys. You have to understand the bad guys mentality. They are devoted but not to bright. ANY doubt is like a cancer in them. That is one of the reasons that Islam is so strict - to keep the stupid in line. Our guys would prefer wacking them at 1,000 meters because the head trip that causes is very insidious; however, that is not always practical.

The article is inaccurate in several points of which I will not discuss in public.

37 posted on 02/10/2007 7:10:57 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ (So many geeks so few circuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Condor51
A Dragunov makes better sense than an SKS. By all accounts, they are wonderful sniper rifles. I once held a Dragunov in my hands (but never fired it) and it appeared to be an evolution based wholly on the AK-47.

http://www.dragunov.net/

38 posted on 02/10/2007 7:12:14 AM PST by PUGACHEV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: radar101

"One Special Forces commando stated that the lawyers are risking lives in Iraq because of confusing written rules on when troops can fire weapons in "Escalation of Force" cases, that is, combat against insurgents and al Qaeda terrorists.
"Escalation of force is ridiculous over there," the commando said. "If an EOF occurs and a weapon is fired, it is to be reported so 'a 15-6 investigation' can be initiated."
An Army Regulation 15-6 investigation requires a commanding officer to gather evidence, interview witnesses and write a report every time a weapon is fired, a time-consuming and useless bureaucratic exercise in a war zone where numerous firefights take place almost every day"

This isn't a police department dealing with a high crime area. This is our military fighting in a war!

WHEN will the Beltway folks wake up to the reality that the only way to engage an enemy is the aggressive use of massively overpowering force designed to kill as many of the enemy as can be killed in the shortest time possible? Anything less and we are wasting our time,


39 posted on 02/10/2007 7:13:34 AM PST by GLH3IL (Truth: The remedy for liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcostell
It's neither a 7.62X39 AK round, nor a "308" (7.62X51).

It's a 7.62X54R (R = "rimmed") that's a very old but extremely effective Russian cartridge that goes all the way back to the bolt action Mosin-Nagants used by the Russians in WW's 1 and 2, and a number of Russian light machine guns, but in this instance it is used in the SVD ("Dragunov") sniper weapon.

While they do share a common bullet diameter, the bullets themselves are much different, and the "39", "51", and "54" denote the length of the cartridges in millimeters, so one can understand the advanced ballistic performance afforded by the additional size of the cartridge. Very deadly round, reasonably effective sniper weapon.
40 posted on 02/10/2007 7:18:28 AM PST by conservativeharleyguy (Technically, we're all Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson