Right. I see you're as confused as you've ever been. We have a history that goes back years and years. Through all that time, you haven't changed, you haven't grown. Here we are, common ground exists between us, yet you want to ignore it. That serves no good purpose.
>>>>I said way back on my first post of this thread that Rudy has an abortion, 2A and illegal immigration problem.
So let me get this right. We're not in basic agreement that Rudy is wrong on abortion, 2nd amendment and illegal immigration? Even though our rhetoric is in agreement. Okay.
You said:
"That doesn't mean that we "basically agree" and it doesn't mean that I'm arguing for the sake of arguing. Do you actually have a problem with that? Do you actually think that is being augmentative?
Yeah, I think that is being purposely argumentative and your contradictory remarks show signs of a serious language or comprehension problem on your part. Now you've backed your self into a corner. What's next?
There are many subjects/topics contained on my list of major social issues that could be debated. You want to boil them down to three issues and ignore all the rest. Kind of leaves you standing around with no way out. And looking real foolish to boot. It'll be interesting to see how you extricate yourself from this dilemma. I'll enjoy watching. Carry on.
Actually, my recollection of you as a poster through the years is somebody who I do see common ground with and somebody who is not a spammer. Instead (and I'm not trying to flame you) I see you as somebody who mistakenly believes that the time of Reagan was actually better than now. While others on this board have trashed you for things I have pretty much refrained from piling on at least while they were trashing you.
That said, last night you said a simple statement that Rudy was liberal on all social issues. I corrected you on it and I spent time (late at night when I should have been sleeping) and I gave you a good list to back up my claim. Instead of either agreeing with me or disputing my list, you gave me a non-sequitur question to answer and then you blamed me for not answering it and for being argumentative.
Maybe it's because I said when making my correct point that "you don't know what you are talking about". If you think that's an inappropriate response then just say so. Don't start flailing all over the place making false arguments and accusations about me.
Here's another of your false arguments. Something about me supposedly trying to boil down your list(that I agree with) into only three subjects.
There are many subjects/topics contained on my list of major social issues that could be debated. You want to boil them down to three issues and ignore all the rest. Kind of leaves you standing around with no way out. And looking real foolish to boot.
LOL! What?
Anyway...