Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The tiny airline spy that spots bombers in the blink of an eye (camera/mic mounted in seat backs)
The Daily Mail (U.K.) ^ | February 10, 2007 | CHRISTOPHER LEAKE

Posted on 02/11/2007 4:58:21 AM PST by Stoat

The tiny airline spy that spots bombers in the blink of an eye

By CHRISTOPHER LEAKE - More by this author » Last updated at 21:53pm on 10th February 2007

 

Tiny cameras the size of a fingernail linked to specialist computers are to be used to monitor the behaviour of airline passengers as part of the war on terrorism.

Cameras fitted to seat-backs will record every twitch, blink, facial expression or suspicious movement before sending the data to onboard software which will check it against individual passenger profiles.

Scientists from Britain and Germany are spending £25million developing a system which they hope will make it virtually impossible to hijack an airliner by providing pilots and cabin crew with an early warning of a possible terrorist attack such as 9/11.

They say that rapid eye movements, blinking excessively, licking lips or ways of stroking hair or ears are classic symptoms of somebody trying to conceal something.

A separate microphone will hear and record even whispered remarks. Islamic suicide bombers are known to whisper texts from the Koran in the moments before they explode bombs.

The software being developed by the scientists will be so sophisticated that it will be able to take account of nervous flyers or people with a natural twitch, helping to ensure there are no false alarms.

"We're trying to develop technologies that indicate the differences between normal passengers and those who may be a threat to others, or themselves," said Catherine Neary of BAE Systems.

Mrs Neary, team leader of the Onboard Threat Detection System for the Paris-based Security Of Aircraft In The Future European Environment (SAFEE) project, added: "Blink rates come from lie-detection research and suggest the stress level is higher than normal."

The project is also developing automated flight controls that will prevent a hijacker taking over an airliner and sensors at the aircraft's doors to detect if someone is carrying explosives or chemicals.

Mrs Neary said that under the Data Protection Act, all video, audio and other recordings would be destroyed at the end of every flight so that passengers' civil liberties were not infringed.

Shami Chakrabarti, director of the human rights group Liberty, said: "Watching people constantly on aircraft and trying to work out patterns of behaviour is a difficult road to travel.

"I suspect that it will put people off flying because they will feel uncomfortable if their every blink and twitch is being monitored."

Airlines gave the scheme a cautious welcome, indicating it would be too expensive to fit on existing commercial aircraft and that it would probably be ten years before such systems were fitted to new planes.

A British Airways spokeswoman said: "While we welcome new research and development which advances aviation security, we believe the emphasis and funding for any new initiatives would be better placed on preventing terrorists boarding aircraft in the first place.

"For example, research and development of better screening and detection equipment on the ground would be of more value at this time."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Technical; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: airline; bigbrotherairlines; camera; dontpickyournose; terrorism; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
They say that rapid eye movements, blinking excessively, licking lips or ways of stroking hair or ears are classic symptoms of somebody trying to conceal something.

Well gee, now that you've detailed your selection criteria and printed it in the media, no terrorists will ever read it and mask these behaviors, will they now?

The project is also developing automated flight controls that will prevent a hijacker taking over an airliner and sensors at the aircraft's doors to detect if someone is carrying explosives or chemicals.

I don't suppose they considered the implementation of aggressive profiling, which would most likely be far more effective? No?  I didn't think so.  I'm still waiting to hear about a Norwegian grandma trying to hijack a plane.

Political correctness will be the death of us all.

1 posted on 02/11/2007 4:58:29 AM PST by Stoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Stoat

It seems a little late once their on the plane.


2 posted on 02/11/2007 5:03:34 AM PST by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

One word: "gum"


3 posted on 02/11/2007 5:04:47 AM PST by elfman2 (An army of amateurs doing the media's job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

What if hijackers bought up most/all of the seats on any flight? What then?


4 posted on 02/11/2007 5:05:36 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

The possibilities are horrific. Passenger 3A is on a medication that dries out the membranes, resulting in dry lips and eyes. He's also nervous about flying. Take-off scares him, ascent scares him, and turbulence scares him, plus he has an itchy ear from the mosquitos that he left behind in Houston. They gonna pick him up?

How about putting up a newspaper to block the camera while the evil passenger is delivering signals or being nervous?


5 posted on 02/11/2007 5:08:38 AM PST by Clara Lou (Hillary: We're going to take some things from you on behalf of the common good. [2004])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DB

Ad this technology to a seat belt with a controled lock.....and the pilot could control every seat.


6 posted on 02/11/2007 5:08:39 AM PST by cbkaty (I may not always post...but I am always here......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DB
It seems a little late once their on the plane.

Yes, I would prefer it if they were profiled out of the picture before they even arrived at the airport.

7 posted on 02/11/2007 5:13:18 AM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: elfman2
One word: "gum"

10 cents worth of candy in the hands of a four year old can derail a fifty million dollar project and cause the diversion of a 150 million dollar aircraft and the disruption of the lives of many hundreds of people.

 

8 posted on 02/11/2007 5:17:33 AM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
Rapid eye movements, blinking excessively, licking lips or ways of stroking hair or ears are classic symptoms of somebody who knows that Muslims are allowed on the aircraft.
9 posted on 02/11/2007 5:20:42 AM PST by MrBambaLaMamba (Buy 'Allah' brand urinal cakes - If you can't kill the enemy at least you can piss on their god)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGalt
What if hijackers bought up most/all of the seats on any flight? What then?

The airline would probably switch off the system because they wouldn't want to risk a massive lawsuit.

10 posted on 02/11/2007 5:20:53 AM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DB
"It seems a little late once their on the plane."

No,No, that's the beauty of the whole thing. You see, each seat also has a trap door underneath it. And the captian has this special red button...........

11 posted on 02/11/2007 5:24:55 AM PST by joebuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MrBambaLaMamba
Rapid eye movements, blinking excessively, licking lips or ways of stroking hair or ears are classic symptoms of somebody who knows that Muslims are allowed on the aircraft.

It seems to me that a "Muslim only" airline would either be a huge success because Muzzies would flock to it so that they don't have to sit near infidels and they can eat their halal food, or it would be a huge flop because no insurance company would underwrite it because it would represent an unacceptable risk of loss of the aircraft.

12 posted on 02/11/2007 5:25:21 AM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Wait! What does the ACLU have to say about this?!


13 posted on 02/11/2007 5:25:34 AM PST by marvlus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

This is so idiotic! Technology for the sake of technology.


14 posted on 02/11/2007 5:26:29 AM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou

Lets add this up...your computer on board identifies 8 middle-eastern guys on the plane...who meet the eye-blinker alert. This shows up in the drive up to the runway area. You as the pilot cite engine issues and pull back to the gate. They unload the crowd and bring the 8 middle-eastern guys over to a FBI rep who asks alot of questions and asks for their travel plans. In five minutes...their stories fall apart.


15 posted on 02/11/2007 5:31:03 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

16 posted on 02/11/2007 5:33:37 AM PST by Gritty (Our enemies among us are secure that being a suspect group protects against being suspect-Vanderleun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marvlus
Wait! What does the ACLU have to say about this?!

Although I am embarrassed to say that I didn't phone them up before I posted this, I'm guessing that they would approve of it because


17 posted on 02/11/2007 5:34:40 AM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Stoat; JewishRighter

And even if this would work, the reason we are advertising it's presence is...?


18 posted on 02/11/2007 5:39:36 AM PST by NCjim (The more I use Windows, the more I love UNIX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
This is so idiotic! Technology for the sake of technology.

Yes, fifty million dollars (so far) on a project that can be defeated by a stick of gum and is ineffective and unreliable at it's foundation, and is not wanted by the airlines anyway..

The Socialist Miracle at work.

19 posted on 02/11/2007 5:41:53 AM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Gritty

GREAT cartoon, thank you for posting :-)


20 posted on 02/11/2007 5:42:44 AM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson