Posted on 02/11/2007 9:14:11 PM PST by Tim Long
A fool and his money...
"this person used the scientific method to prove Creation. No joke in that."
Nor is there need for faith, apparently.
You're not serious that he proved Creation, are you?
Honestly, this guy sounds like a serious nut case who happens to be enrolled in college. I doubt that his "treatise" is likely to be published very soon, and I wouldn't define published as simply having it sold at a religious website.
Theology and science have not mixed well in this corner of the universe. Why in the world do people keep trying?
This is the only thing that makes sense in the whole article since God and time are really frozen together in the spiritual realm where no eye can truly see except the eye of faith.
Sorry folks faith is the only clue God will ever give us and even then only through Jesus Christ.
Uhhhh, where did the water come from? I'm all for God speaking the universe into existence, but this doesn't seem a good way to approach the concept.
He equates the Holy Spirit with a magnetic field!
This is either stupidity or blasphemy or both.
Seriously, isn't this blasphemy, in addition to simply being really really stupid? The writer seems to believe that millions of people have been using God to post notes on their refrigerators and generate electric power.
That aligns with one of the earlier descriptions of the creation by God, when, in Genesis 1:1-3, the Holy Spirit moved upon the face of the deep, which generally is considered water, "
Where did the water come from?
I applaud this guy's motives too, but God created our physics and you can't create our physics with our physics.
LOL...you are joking, right?
Glad that's settled.
No more need for Cosmology.
(sarcasm)
"Well, if he's assuming the existence of water before light, I suspect he's on the wrong track, big time."
As is the Bible then...
Genesis 1:1-3
(1) In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
(2) And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
(3) And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
I'm not taking a position here, just quoting the relevant verses.
Better watch that, now that they are defending the two BP agents they've become a "trusted news source" around here, at least for a few Freepers.....
Pure crackpot. He didn't last long. Here is a link to the thread.
He reminded me of the old quote:
Ask the young. They know everything.Joseph Joubert
sonoluminescence
Science "discovers" GOD
Why cant nature give evidence for a Creator?
In fact it must!
Just as a Building is evidence of an Architect
and a Book evidence of an Author.
Nature is the "Handywork" of GOD.
Evolution is just a "Denial" of Natures Signature.
Don't believe everything you read.
Yes I dont believe you.
God says, "Go for it. That's worth seeing."
The scientist stoops and grabs a handful of dirt.
"Hold on!" roars God. That's mine! Get your own dirt!"
Theology and science have not mixed well in this corner of the universe.
You couldn't be more wrong
There is nothing in Science that says God is not the Creator.
It is Evolution and Science that dont mix well.
In Fact Nature and God should fit very well, and Scientific tests should be able to connect them.
If the Supernatural, is the Maker of the Natural, there will be a "Signature"
So you think God is a magnet?
"Now I know why people are calling it WorldNutDaily"
Its WhirledNutsDaily
"If the Supernatural, is the Maker of the Natural, there will be a "Signature""
Good luck on that quest, but I won't hold my breath. I'm already 55.
Science is the exploration of how God manifests the universe.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.